ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
11 January 2010, 05:35 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA/UK
Posts: 1,375
|
compare and contrast for me: black ExII vs GMT C
i am considering a black face Exp II vs a GMT IIc. I like the black face explorer, and dont like the polished links on the GMT, but the GMT seems to retain value a lot better. And it has the 3186 (when did it appear in the Exp II). I would love to garner opinions from the forum members on this dilemma.
|
11 January 2010, 05:41 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: TX
Watch: Rolex Yacht-Master
Posts: 149
|
If you have the money, then get GMTIIc...one of the best watch ever to come from Rolex IMHO. If money is tight, then go for the EXPII with the 3186 movement...you can get much more discounts with EXPII. I believe that M and V series EXPII have the 3186 movement...supposedly. Thus, EXPII is like the poor-man's version of GMTIIC...and its resale value will reflect that too (if you care about such things).
|
11 January 2010, 05:47 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
I'm not sure how you guys come up with your information...
The Exp II has more references that bring in loads more money than the GMT II.. You can't hardly touch a 25 year old Exp II for under 10 grand.. The GMT IIc has only been out for a couple of years...and it costs a whole lot more than the Exp II, so in the short term it will sell for less.... The only person who needs it to hold value in the short run is somebody who plans to flip it or a volume seller... Get the watch you want to put on your wrist every morning for the next several years...Not what is the Watch de jour..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
11 January 2010, 05:48 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sussex, UK
Watch: 116520, Pam 312
Posts: 286
|
Can pick up a pre loved exp II and not lose any money on it as it has already taken the biggest hit of depreciation.
|
11 January 2010, 06:07 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: John Cirillo
Location: Manhattan
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 119
|
most folks are going to tell you get the watch that feels right for you, otherwise you will just end up flipping the "logical choice" and buying the one you really liked later.
they really are different styles, i have a white dial exp ii that i wear daily. it is low profile, both in terms of noticeability and fit under a cuff. if you are concerned about resale then get one off our sales forum from a regular seller which is what i did. I to don't understand the bad rap the iconic exp ii gets with respect to resale value. I know a guy that bought a gold president from an AD and sold it a few years later, you wanna talk about taking it in the shorts, he lost thousands. but you hardly ever hear hand wringing about the resale value TT and 18K rollies. |
11 January 2010, 06:30 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
I'm with Larry....get the one that makes you smile! End of story.
|
11 January 2010, 06:31 AM | #7 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
...........and you can take that to the bank, right?
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
11 January 2010, 06:31 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: West Ham! COYI!!
Posts: 7,941
|
If you want a Rolex that shouts 'I'M A ROLEX' buy the GMTIIc.
If you want watch that 'flies under the radar' buy the ExpII. IMO re-sale values are reasonably comparable percentage wise to the original cost, so shouldn't really be an issue. (the ExpII's clasp's more of an issue to me than the resale to be honest..... )
__________________
Onwards & Upwards Rodders...... Onwards & Upwards. Life is not about how fast you can run or how high you can climb........... It's about how well you can bounce!! TRF HALL OF FAME JANUARY 2010 |
11 January 2010, 06:32 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: TX
Posts: 1,897
|
Buy the one you want and don't worry about resale. If you know that you will flip (hey, I understand and do it all the time -- at a loss), then look for a good value preowned. I have both the GMTIIC and EXPII 16550. They are so very different, yet I love them both. If I had to choose one, Id go with the GMTIIC. My choice has nothing to do with economics or resale value, I just like wearing the GMTIIC more!
|
11 January 2010, 06:33 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Vic
Location: Colorado, USA
Watch: Mechanical!!
Posts: 807
|
Don't like the PCL- Have them brushed
Bezel- I like the ability to move the bezel for time tracking purposes & I like the ceramic bezel better than the steel w/ painted/engraved #'s
__________________
"Science tastes like vomit." Kari "Mythbusters hottie" Byron Z-serial GMT IIc 2.92M serial 1675 Pepsi V-serial 16610LV |
11 January 2010, 06:44 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Ken Cox
Location: Bend, Oregon, USA
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 469
|
As a professional pilot and world traveler, I have worn a GMT Master II for 26 years and I have found that I don't use the rotating bezel.
The "jump" hour hand serves my purposes much better, as does the 24 hour hand set to UTC/GMT time. I find the height of the bezel on the GMT Master II annoying when it comes to shirt and jacket cuffs, and I note how often Explorer II owners comment favorably about how well an Explorer II fits under cuffs. If buying a watch today, I would favor the black face Explorer II with the 3186 movement over any other present day Rolex; no contest. |
11 January 2010, 08:15 AM | #12 | |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Monterey Bay, CA
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 554
|
Quote:
|
|
11 January 2010, 08:48 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
|
11 January 2010, 08:51 AM | #14 | |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Quote:
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
|
11 January 2010, 06:42 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
|
Deepsea ;)
|
11 January 2010, 08:57 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: united states
Watch: submariner,daytona
Posts: 707
|
i'll go for gmt2c no brainer
|
11 January 2010, 09:02 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: honolulu
Watch: whatever runs
Posts: 551
|
Have u tried either on your wrist? They will wear very differently, and that is and should be one of the most important considerations.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.