ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
3 March 2010, 04:53 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Buckeye Nation
Watch: out 4 Panerai bug
Posts: 414
|
Here on TRF- may be real but photo has ? mark
The photo looks like a real Rolex and maybe a very good seller, but the iefix data say the photo was taken in 2008.
It maybe the owner never set his/her time date. You may ask the seller to reset his time date stamp and attach new photos before purchasing. (don't mean to make trouble for seller) http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=117614 Last edited by Evan614; 3 March 2010 at 05:12 AM.. Reason: oops forgot link |
3 March 2010, 10:22 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,858
|
Take care of the small things and the big things will take care of themselves.
|
3 March 2010, 10:32 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
Was a V serial DSSD available in September 08? He says its BNIB and warranty dated 03/10.
So simply a case of camera not being set properly. There's being careful and then there's going ott and all together over suspicious to the detriment of other peoples good characeter. I never set the date on my camera. Ever. If we're gonna start investigating the exif data on everyone's pics then there will be dozens of threads where the date is "wrong". |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.