ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
11 November 2010, 11:06 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: All of them
Posts: 2,789
|
1675 Question.....
I have been looking for a 1675 from my birth year. 1965...I found one today that I was looking at.....1.8 serial.
Overall good condition, folded link bracelet, 580 endlinks, patina on both hands and dial. Very nice.......however no B/P. I did not give it the micro scope treatment yet or open it, I am not worried about authenticity as I have bought form this dealer before. Question: What is the price range, high and low for one of these? I am just trying to get an average price, what the market value based on the TRF members experience is? I have shopped around already...... I am not buying it for a collection piece, it will be a daily wearer. Thanks in advance
__________________
I used to be indecisive, now I'm not sure |
11 November 2010, 11:10 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
i reckon 3.8-4.2k, but obviously depends on what it comes with (papers etc).
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
12 November 2010, 10:20 AM | #3 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
Quote:
But as you said no B&P, no worries about that. However, original bezel insert could be worth a couple hundred dollars! You do not mention if it is a replacement or proper time period. |
|
12 November 2010, 12:15 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Nick
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer I
Posts: 256
|
im no expert, but i dont think 1.8 serial is '65. i think '68
|
12 November 2010, 12:24 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: London
Watch: Sea-Dweller
Posts: 1,765
|
|
12 November 2010, 03:45 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Steve
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Watch: GMT Master Pepsi
Posts: 1,243
|
I am no expert either .........
But I have been relying on this table....
Year Serial 1966 1871000 1967 2163900 1968 2426800 1969 2689700 1970 2952600 1971 3215500 1972 3478400 1973 3741300 1974 4004200 1975 4267100 1976 4538000 1977 5008000 1978 5482000 1979 5958000 1980 6434000 1981 6910000 1982 7386000 1983 7862000 1984 8338000 1985 8614000 1986 9290000 1987 9766000 Mid 1987 R 1988 R 1989 L Mid 1990 E Mid 1991 X Nov 1991 N 1992 C 1993 S 1994 W 1995 W 1996 T Aug 1997 U Dec 1998 A 1999 A 2000 P Mid 2001 K Mid 2002 Y Mid 2003 F 2004 F 2005 D 2006 Z Mid 2007 M Aug 2008 V |
12 November 2010, 05:11 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 21
|
I think this IS the correct table:
Dal numero: Al numero: Anno 340.000 450.000 1945 450.000 580.000 1946 580.000 600.000 1947 600.000 640.000 1948 640.000 670.000 1949 670.000 730.000 1950 730.000 870.000 1951 870.000 920.000 1952 920.000 980.000 1953 980.000 999.999 1954 10.000 60.000 1954* 60.000 140.000 1955 140.000 220.000 1956 220.000 380.000 1957 380.000 430.000 1958 430.000 530.000 1959 530.000 680.000 1960 680.000 840.000 1961 840.000 950.000 1962 950.000 990.000 1963 990.000 1.140.000 1964 1.140.000 1.280.000 1965 1.280.000 1.530.000 1966 1.530.000 1.720.000 1967 1.720.000 1.950.000 1968 1.950.000 2.350.000 1969 2.350.000 2.590.000 1970 2.590.000 2.900.000 1971 2.900.000 3.200.000 1972 3.200.000 3.610.000 1973 3.610.000 3.860.000 1974 3.860.000 4.120.000 1975 4.120.000 4.439.999 1976 * Dal numero: Al numero: Anno 4.440.000 5.000.000 fornitura** 5.000.000 5.500.000 1977 5.500.000 5.970.000 1978 5.970.000 6.200.000 1979 6.200.000 6.540.000 1980 6.540.000 7.220.000 1981 7.220.000 7.620.000 1982 7.620.000 8.430.000 1983 8.430.000 8.830.000 1984 8.830.000 9.350.000 1985 9.350.000 9.760.000 1986 9.760.000 9.999.999 1987 R R 1987*** R L 1988 L L 1989 L E 1990 E X 1991 N N 1992 C S 1993 S S 1994 W W 1995 W T 1996 T U 1997 U U 1998 A A 1999 P P 2000 P K 2001 K Y 2002 Y F 2003 F F 2004 F D 2005 Z Z 2006 You can see the table in vetroplastica: http://www.vetroplastica.it/tabella-seriali-rolex.html |
12 November 2010, 09:52 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: brisbane
Watch: 1966 GMT
Posts: 92
|
As I bought my 1675 new in 1966 and it is 1.4 mil I guess Cefiro is correct!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.