The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 15 December 2010, 03:11 PM   #1
cid
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: 35.0844° N, 106.6
Posts: 195
Rolex prices

Someone recently posted a question about Rolex cost vs. MSRP and the discussion got me thinking: why does Rolex price their watches so much higher than others? Yes, Yes, I know, quality, craftsmanship, etc. but Rolex consistently raises its prices annually and the increase at times seems extraordinary.

Please don't misunderstand my post. I love Rolex, I own a Rolex and it's my primary watch. But anyone with a reasonable mind must see that Rolex charges substantially more than its competitors, who arguably produce the same quality of product. Take Omega and Breitling for example, excluding their base ETA movement watches (which are admittedly good movements), their in-house movements are equal in quality, durability, reliability and precision to Rolex movement; yet you can regularly find one of these watches for much less than you can a Rolex. I have an Omega hour vision, it matches second for second with my Rolex and debatably has comparable or dare I say superior movement to my Rolex, but I paid $2,000 less for it than my LV.

Ultimately, it's Rolex' prerogative to charge what it wants - after all, Rolex sells every watch it releases to the public. And, more importantly, we, including myself, seem to be willing to fork out the money to buy these watches - price increases notwithstanding.

I'm interested to hear your thoughts on this.
cid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 03:19 PM   #2
steve1985
"TRF" Member
 
steve1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: ohio
Posts: 160
I don't know what to tell you, when i was shopping for a new watch my wife wanted to buy me a fossil or citizen. I went to look to appease her but I was not impressed. We stopped at a local AD and I tried on a few Rolex watches and was instantly in love. It was just looked sharper and cleaner then any other watch I ever wore. I have mine on my wrist typing this and I honestly can tell you nothing else will ever go on this wrist again.
steve1985 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2010, 03:39 AM   #3
dooder202
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: US
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 1,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve1985 View Post
I don't know what to tell you, when i was shopping for a new watch my wife wanted to buy me a fossil or citizen. I went to look to appease her but I was not impressed. We stopped at a local AD and I tried on a few Rolex watches and was instantly in love. It was just looked sharper and cleaner then any other watch I ever wore. I have mine on my wrist typing this and I honestly can tell you nothing else will ever go on this wrist again.
Very true, but a good design does not have to cost a lot of money.

For instance, I'm sure most people would agree that a BMW 5 or 3 series, is a much nicer looking car than let's say a Ford Focus or a Ford Taurus, but just because the design is nicer does not mean it COST the MANUFACTURER more money to produce. Lines are lines, basic design elements on the car are just as cheap as on a drawing board with the artists. (Of course the materials and processes are much, much different, but that's a difference in WHY it costs more)

It seems that the better the design, the higher the price of course, and we pay it because we know we can only get that design in one place.

Sometimes when I step out of the box and realize how much money a Rolex really is and how much I paid I sometimes feel its crazy!

But at the end of the day, no other watch appeals to me like a Rolex, maybe it's because it says "Rolex" and is a mental thing, but to each his own.
dooder202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 03:20 PM   #4
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
Your Hour Vision is Omega's Halo product, in much the same way that Audi makes the mid engined R8. I wouldn't just say the movement is as good, I'd say its considerably more advanced than almost anything on the market today, which is what you would expect when swatch group spends a massive chunk of change developing a new base movement to reposition the Omega brand around.

I don't have any illusions that the majority of Omega's lines fall somewhat short of Rolex, while still being superior to most of the likes of TAG etc, but the Hour Vision, PloProf, and Liquid Metal PO were designed and built to standards above the average Rolex. It wouldn't surprise me if Omega actually lost money out of any of those three watches because of it either.

The way I look at it, Omega made the better watch in the 50s and 60s in the form of the Constellations as they compared to their Rolex competitor, the datejust. Then Rolex took the sports watch market, and never let go of it, while Omega lost steam, stopped making in-house movements (their biggest mistake as they were extremely good at it) and eventually lost their way in a sea of ETA movements and mediocrity.

The Hour Vision is old Omega in terms of quality, and I get the feeling they're moving towards old Omega's pricing too (on par or higher than Rolex).

There's no need to qualify your post tbh, claiming a SMP is better than a sub will get some strange looks but its hard to fault your impressions of the HV, its a different animal altogether.

Rolex charge what they charge because they can, Omega's prices are going up rapidly, and I expect them to reach or exceed Rolex's before too long for some if not most models. Their new boutiques are now refusing to discount in many cases, holding the same hard line most Rolex AD's do.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 03:22 PM   #5
psv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
I suggest a college course in pricing, especially of luxury goods with irrational buyers. Perception is everything.

Additionally, I wouldn't quite put Omega, Breitling and IWC on the same level as Rolex. Nor is Rolex on the same level as Patek Philippe, Breguet, VC and AP.
psv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 04:12 PM   #6
fc3s2k
"TRF" Member
 
fc3s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Barry
Location: california
Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI
Posts: 1,289
my guess is supply and demand. I might be wrong. I love mine though!!!
__________________
fc3s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 04:24 PM   #7
MBEECH
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal/MN
Watch: Daytona WG 116509
Posts: 26
Look up Veblen goods.
MBEECH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 04:25 PM   #8
kareemthedream33
"TRF" Member
 
kareemthedream33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,748
You are going to get the standard answers here: "supply and demand", "because they can", "they sell every watch they make", "what are you a commie? Go take economics 101". These are valid points, except the last one which is a joke. However, I can't stand the ridiculous bi-annual price increases to models that haven't changed even slightly. Some models get increases twice in 12 months despite no changes to the model at all. The plat yachtmaster got nearly a 35% increase over a two year period and yet was unchanged. Same goes from the no-date sub. Sorry, justify it all you want, that's crazy. Its almost like they throw darts at a board to decide which models will be increased and by how much. Judging by the current trend, most SS models will be around the 10k mark within 5 years.
kareemthedream33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 05:39 PM   #9
lerox
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: malaysia
Posts: 17
Yes, definitely 'demand & supply'. Certain sports model are tagged at premium price due to demand in the region.
The new sub seems to cost more than the GMT2?
lerox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 06:06 PM   #10
Noriki
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bangkok
Watch: Mix
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by lerox View Post
Yes, definitely 'demand & supply'. Certain sports model are tagged at premium price due to demand in the region.
The new sub seems to cost more than the GMT2?
Sub price are always higher then GMT
Noriki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2010, 11:22 PM   #11
lerox
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: malaysia
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noriki View Post
Sub price are always higher then GMT
Back in 2008 when my brother bought his sub. it was definitely cheaper than the gmt then.
For the new sub c, it has been priced above the gmt2c.
Anyway, few weeks ago. i bought an ss gmt2c from an AD in Dubai. It was a saving of usd1k++ as compare to my local AD premium price tag!
lerox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2010, 10:09 AM   #12
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by lerox View Post
Back in 2008 when my brother bought his sub. it was definitely cheaper than the gmt then.
For the new sub c, it has been priced above the gmt2c.
Anyway, few weeks ago. i bought an ss gmt2c from an AD in Dubai. It was a saving of usd1k++ as compare to my local AD premium price tag!
Well, of course it was cheaper back then, you're comparing two generations of watches. The 16610 was always slightly higher than the 16710, and the 116610 is slightly higher than the 116710 - it was inevitable that the 116710 was going to cost more than the 16610 as it's a more advanced watch
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 06:11 PM   #13
hacampbell1360
"TRF" Member
 
hacampbell1360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Hiep Phan John
Location: san jose, ca
Watch: The Fantastic FOUR
Posts: 267
Can I guess the reason why the watch that you current owned retained it value so well is because new watches kept on increasing. That why I dont mind forking out some $$$ now and sit on it for a while.

Wouldn't you like to buy a house and 20 years from now sells it for more than what you original paid for? In the rolex case, Its like that.

I think it all come to supply and demand. There is only one Rolex company in the world., not in China, not in Hong Kong, not in Mexico or Thailand. A Rolex is a Rolex is a Rolex, Nothing else is a Rolex. Rolex supplies the world population of almost 10,000,000,000 people. As long as we are willing to buy'em they keep making'em.

Its a great feeling to know that my watch worth more next year than this year!
hacampbell1360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 06:42 PM   #14
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
The same could be asked of Panerai or Patek in the world of watches, or of Porsche or Ferrari in the world of cars. Or for ladies fashion, Louis Vitton and Chanel.
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 06:48 PM   #15
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
all luxury goods must be priced accordingly, and price increases are needed to keep the brand desirable...
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2010, 11:33 PM   #16
petesjag
"TRF" Member
 
petesjag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Puffy View Post
all luxury goods must be priced accordingly, and price increases are needed to keep the brand desirable...
agreed...
petesjag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 06:56 PM   #17
Desperado
"TRF" Member
 
Desperado's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Karim
Location: Dubai
Watch: YM Platinum
Posts: 653
Its only for Brand Positioning purposes. think about it this way,reducing the price of a Rolex to match Omega or Breitling will only undermine its perceived value.
Desperado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 07:04 PM   #18
baxta69
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: davinci
Location: suffolk, uk
Watch: Rolex & Breitling
Posts: 340
I tend to look at it as a way of keeping the brand somewhat exclusive. A bit like drinking in an expensive wine bar as opposed to the public bar in a pub. It keeps the riff raff out
Seriously, it may be true that Rolex are more affordable these days to a larger proportion of people as most of us are in fairly well paid nowadays. But there is always that element of keeping the watches just slightly out of reach to give the impression of a little bit of grandeur. Work a bit harder son and you too could own a Rolex...thats seems to be the ethos. I personally think it is money well spent and generally a good investment. I bought a TT Breitling Crosswind in 2002 for £3,330. Its now worth about £1200. I could have bought a Rolex for the same price and probably hardly lost anything. You pays your money and makes your choice.
baxta69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 07:10 PM   #19
George Ab
"TRF" Member
 
George Ab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
Rolex does it to protect your investment, by keeping it desirable.

It maintains the perception of value they have ingrained in the masses.
__________________

George Ab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2010, 07:46 AM   #20
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by George Ab View Post
Rolex does it to protect your investment, by keeping it desirable.
Trust me, the only investment Rolex gives a bloody damn about is their own.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Lug Hole Lover®
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 07:28 PM   #21
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
They still sell, year after year after year. If the formula your complaining about doesn't work they wouldn't sell and they would have to make adjustments eventually.
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 December 2010, 09:09 PM   #22
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
Short answer: Because they can.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2010, 03:54 AM   #23
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Personally I think if you compare Rolex to brands we might consider direct compition I don't see much difference. The Ploprof and liquid metal Omegas are good examples as well as several in Panerai line.

The real difference I see is the raw numbers of watches Rolex pumps out for the same price as other brands whose numbers are much smaller.

I have to admit though, as long as people buy them Rolex isn't about to cut pricing.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 December 2010, 10:05 AM   #24
dsio
"TRF" Member
 
dsio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Ashley
Location: Brisbane
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680 '79
Posts: 2,301
The other brand Rolex is now brushing up against more and more is JLC, used prices for Rolex are often above JLC and new isn't far off anymore. Make that comparison, from the Datejust to the RDM, or the Daytona to the MCC/EWC and Submariner to Navy Seal Alarm and Rolex is on the losing end in quality and engineering.

The new sub is still a huge leap forward but JLC is in a different category for the most part and presents incredible value for money.
__________________
-- Omega Seamaster Grand-Lux Stepped Pie-Pan 14K Gold OJ2627 '53 --
-- Omega Cal 320 Chronograph 18K Gold OT2872 '58 --
-- Omega Cal 321 Speedmaster Pro 145.012 '67 --
-- Rolex Submariner 1680 "Ghost" '79 --
-- Rolex SS Daytona 116520 '04 --
dsio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2010, 02:55 AM   #25
jeremyam
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Watch: 16610 V
Posts: 511
Quote:
Originally Posted by cid View Post
Someone recently posted a question about Rolex cost vs. MSRP and the discussion got me thinking: why does Rolex price their watches so much higher than others? Yes, Yes, I know, quality, craftsmanship, etc. but Rolex consistently raises its prices annually and the increase at times seems extraordinary.

Please don't misunderstand my post. I love Rolex, I own a Rolex and it's my primary watch. But anyone with a reasonable mind must see that Rolex charges substantially more than its competitors, who arguably produce the same quality of product. Take Omega and Breitling for example, excluding their base ETA movement watches (which are admittedly good movements), their in-house movements are equal in quality, durability, reliability and precision to Rolex movement; yet you can regularly find one of these watches for much less than you can a Rolex. I have an Omega hour vision, it matches second for second with my Rolex and debatably has comparable or dare I say superior movement to my Rolex, but I paid $2,000 less for it than my LV.

Ultimately, it's Rolex' prerogative to charge what it wants - after all, Rolex sells every watch it releases to the public. And, more importantly, we, including myself, seem to be willing to fork out the money to buy these watches - price increases notwithstanding.

I'm interested to hear your thoughts on this.

Supply v. Demand

That's it.
jeremyam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2010, 06:13 AM   #26
Lion
"TRF" Member
 
Lion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Leo
Location: Midwest
Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI
Posts: 21,461
Items of quality will alway cost more no matter what the market will bear. I was always taught to buy quality over quantity so I buy less but when I do I am always happy. It's very hard to put a value on happiness but isn't that what will all strive for???
__________________

SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#)
THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!!
MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley
MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum
Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!
Lion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2010, 08:10 AM   #27
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
Have you been following the price increases of other brands? On a percentage basis, I would stronly surmise that Omega has increased its prices more than Rolex. Yet, Omega does not hold its value in the pre owned market compared to Rolex. Check out the results of the watch auction held by Christies on Tues., paying close attention to Rolex.

The question is not what, but why? Why does Rolex cost a lot and hold its value? All of the previous posters have answered this very well, except I don't believe it's supply and demand as Rolex has a huge supply, both new and used. It's primarily the name. Rolex stands for a luxury item just as Kleenex stands for tissues and Scotch tape stands for cellophane tape. To my mother, Frigidare and refrigerator were synonmous. Rolex stands for watch- "the" watch. Are there better watches? Better movements? Yes. But to most people, that doesn't matter. Ask a person to quickly name a watch brand, and the first word will be Rolex. It's highly probable that this same person doesn't have a clue what one looks like, but that doesn't matter. Rolex knows this, so they can charge (almost) anything they want and we'll keep coming back. Lastly, don't get me wrong. I love Rolex and have two.
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2010, 08:50 AM   #28
axecollector65
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: New England
Watch: Casio G-Shock
Posts: 199
they consistantly increase their prices to maintain a certain price point to achieve the right balance of desireability while maintaining their prestige within their target audience. In short the higher price is part of their branding.
axecollector65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2010, 09:05 AM   #29
dannyboy123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: LonZealand
Posts: 830
"what are you a commie? Go take economics 101".

Quality.
dannyboy123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 December 2010, 09:53 AM   #30
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by cid View Post
I have an Omega hour vision, it matches second for second with my Rolex and debatably has comparable or dare I say superior movement to my Rolex, but I paid $2,000 less for it than my LV.
I have a $30 dollar Timex that runs circles around my Rolex watches in the accuracy department.

In fact, I have about 13 watches that retail for under $500 that can do the same thing.

Let's face it.

A Rolex is a Rolex and nothing else is.

What more do I need to know?
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.