ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
16 April 2011, 04:12 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
|
Trade in a 16610 lv for sub-c - Crazy?
I have been thinking about the beauty of the new sub -c and was wondering if i would be crazy to trade my lv to get it....I was wondering what you all think...the new sub is a stunner.!
|
16 April 2011, 04:14 AM | #2 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,110
|
The new Sub is a Stunner for sure but you can always get it in few years from today...as for the LV it's getting harder and harder to get one.
I would keep the LV and save for a Sub C
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active |
16 April 2011, 12:43 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,166
|
x2
__________________
Rest in peace JJ! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=JJ+irani "Rolex is highly addictive. Please shop responsibly" |
16 April 2011, 12:50 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
|
I've already done almost exactly that trade (except I went for the TT Sub C). I'm not a believer in investment value. To me, holding on to a mass-produced watch you don't really want to wear for years on the offchance that it might rise in value doesn't make sense.
Even if it does gain in value in say 5 years, you'd only make couple of hundred dollars. IMO, you'd have to own 10 or 20 pieces to make such patience worthwhile. |
16 April 2011, 01:04 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
I have owned both and far prefer the new Sub C. The fact is that it's your wrist, do what makes you happy.
__________________
My grails: |
16 April 2011, 04:15 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,258
|
Are you not wearing your 16610lv????
If you like the 116610......you're not married to the lv.....if it makes you happy..why not?
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
16 April 2011, 04:20 AM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: me save for it.
Posts: 444
|
If you'd rather own the 116610 than the LV, then go for it. If you're asking from an investment perspective, put your money into real investments and buy the watch that you love and will wear.
|
16 April 2011, 04:23 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
|
No..I dont see any of my watches as investments.......My real estate is my investment......Its a matter of taste and ofcourse....the idea that the lv is special because its no longer available....I do love it but would also love the C
|
16 April 2011, 04:25 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,258
|
you could get a black bezel & swap it out if you want the black look.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
16 April 2011, 04:41 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
|
16 April 2011, 06:57 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Quote:
Save for the newer one.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
16 April 2011, 04:20 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
|
I guess saving for the sub -c is an option....a good option.....
|
16 April 2011, 04:38 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
|
16 April 2011, 04:58 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
Do It Do It Do It!!!!
After buying my Sub C and getting used to the Glidelock (especially with the warmer weather upon us) I find it difficult to work any other watches in to the rotation. It is a stunner and, in my opinion, the perfect daily wearer.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
16 April 2011, 05:03 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 466
|
I wouldn't trade the LV for a SUB C but thats me, I would just save and store the lv in a safe place to be used later.
|
16 April 2011, 05:37 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: uk
Watch: 16600
Posts: 55
|
.
I got a sub ceramic a few weeks ago, it's my 5th rolex and it's the first one that feels how I would expect a rolex to feel quality wise,it feels so much better made than any other I've owned including my sea-dweller.the sub c haters need to try one. Saying that the old lv really sings to me I like the green bezel and black maxi dial much more than the new green on green and production wise the 16610 lv numbers must be much much lower than any other rolex sport model. Prices recently seem to be increasing on them and you will never get a new one from an ad again. I'd keep it and save for a sub c but you will love the quality of the sub c.
|
16 April 2011, 12:11 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
I say why not... I would not have a problem flipping it if your not wearing the lv but as others have mentioned if you still like it, save up for it and by the time you have the $$$ there will be more Sub C around and a better deal to be had as well
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
16 April 2011, 12:11 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
No
|
16 April 2011, 12:12 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
DO it..:P
|
16 April 2011, 12:15 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
not crazy .. so long as you are happy
|
16 April 2011, 12:19 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 685
|
Both watches are great. You have my support.
__________________
Bell & Ross: BRS-98S Casio: G-Shock GW-5000U / GW-5000-1JF / DW-5035D 35th / DW-5030C 30th / DW-5000SP 20th / DW-5600C-9CV / Marlin W-450 Panerai: Luminor 000i Seiko: SBGX117 / SBGX335 |
16 April 2011, 12:41 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
As long as you're happy....go for it!
|
16 April 2011, 05:51 PM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Texas
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 314
|
I would not do it..... Just my two cents..... I am very happy with my LV.... I can wait.....
|
16 April 2011, 08:02 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rennes, FRANCE
Posts: 802
|
In a few years you will see the subC everywhere... That is a fact. Will you regret?
If no, go for the SubC!
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons. |
16 April 2011, 08:12 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fernwood
Posts: 3,455
|
Keep the LV!
__________________
116613LN 16600SD 16610LV 116710 16710 16570 Speedy 3570.50 PAM25 Oris TT1 and a bunch of G-Shocks. Flipped: Daytona 116520 Seamaster 2231.80 |
16 April 2011, 08:20 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Batman
Posts: 452
|
Complete Madness! Don't do it. |
16 April 2011, 08:21 PM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: MJR
Location: Midlands, UK
Watch: 116618 LB
Posts: 878
|
Not even close for me. The LV is nice, like most Rolexes, but the glidelock is such an upgrade. The ceramic bezels are stunning too. Do it!
|
16 April 2011, 09:21 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: MI
Watch: SeaDweller
Posts: 873
|
It depends on what you're getting in trade value. If it's close to an even swap, absolutely. Otherwise, save your money and buy a new sub later. You can always get cash out of your LV if you ever need.
|
16 April 2011, 11:57 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
I would do it, as swapping to the SubC is just a progression in your ownership of Rolex.
|
17 April 2011, 12:47 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Barry
Location: california
Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI
Posts: 1,289
|
Why don't you get the Sub C LV
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.