ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

B. Doggy · 26 June 2011, 08:34 AM

It has been done with the 312 and 233, but what about these....

Both uber delicious in their own right and chalked full of history & PAM DNA. But which one do you choose??

mfer · 26 June 2011, 08:48 AM

Oh man..........

for me 190, but is a tough choice for sure.

mfer · 26 June 2011, 09:37 AM

12 views and only 2 votes!

esm · 26 June 2011, 10:21 AM

On Tapatalk, so can't vote

I'd have to go with the 232 since I'm not a big fan of sub dial on Panerai watches....

B. Doggy · 26 June 2011, 10:23 AM

You know the one I've been hankering for, Mik. However, getting the 190 back in the mix has been something I've considered if I can get the 372. It would be a good way to change things up in the PAM rotation. The second hand and sweeeet 8-day movement.....

Shade · 26 June 2011, 12:07 PM

232 only because of the dial and cream letters lol.

mfer · 26 June 2011, 01:05 PM

Tied up! 4/4

TswaneNguni · 26 June 2011, 01:58 PM

Order of preference :

249
232
190

However,the margins are VERY small.All great choices

Shade · 26 June 2011, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

Tied up! 4/4

I wouldnt be surprised Mik, I havent been presented both at once before. But if I had, I wouldnt know what to do either lol.

ocwatching · 26 June 2011, 02:58 PM

made this choice when I picked up the 190 late last year...

just a more versatile piece for daily wear..

gold hands+JLC movement = ultimate daily PAM

unless you throw the in the 249 into the poll

Shade · 26 June 2011, 06:12 PM

Well, I feel ya Phil, despite liking my 232 very much, I will not turn down a 190 haha.

swatty · 26 June 2011, 07:13 PM

The 190 could be my first Panerai

TSW · 26 June 2011, 07:14 PM

190 for sure!

jvo300 · 26 June 2011, 09:55 PM

I think the 190 would be more wearable for me given its 45mm dimension.

dukerules · 26 June 2011, 10:25 PM

My two favorite Rads by a mile. You can't go wrong with either...if I had to choose one, it's the 232, but I'd love to own either.

B. Doggy · 27 June 2011, 12:52 AM

Wow! To my surprise the 190 is in the lead over the SE...

Shade · 27 June 2011, 01:13 AM

Yes, amazingly the 47mm is an issue to many..

mfer · 27 June 2011, 01:30 AM

Well, 190 is close to SE numbers. Only 2056 made (including the 6 OORs)

MikeJaye · 27 June 2011, 01:35 AM

I must be the only here that doesn't rate the 232. Yes it's got history but it's basically a 210 with gold hands. I chose the 190 due to lovely JLC 8 day movement, 45mm size and seconds sub dial.

dalip · 27 June 2011, 02:10 AM

190 for me also.

ocwatching · 27 June 2011, 03:22 AM

I think it really depends on what your own watch wearing habits and how the 47mm will fit into your collection.

I personally will probably keep the 44mm and the 45mm for dailies and the 47mm will be for special GTG or WIS events.
To a non-WIS, the 47mm on my wrist is huge.

its a win win all around though...

B. Doggy · 27 June 2011, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ocwatching

I think it really depends on what your own watch wearing habits and how the 47mm will fit into your collection.

I personally will probably keep the 44mm and the 45mm for dailies and the 47mm will be for special GTG or WIS events.
To a non-WIS, the 47mm on my wrist is huge.

its a win win all around though...

I like the way you think, Phil!

heart82 · 27 June 2011, 07:47 AM

After I just got my first rad, the 210, a week ago. Now, If I want another rad, it would have to be something like 190. I just like the sub sec, and power ind in the back.

mfer · 27 June 2011, 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by heart82

After I just got my first rad, the 210, a week ago. Now, If I want another rad, it would have to be something like 190. I just like the sub sec, and power ind in the back.

Both a 210 and a 190. Now that is just crazy!

Shade · 27 June 2011, 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

Both a 210 and a 190. Now that is just crazy!

Im sure you are Mik! Good crazy though hahaha..

Well the voting is close, 190 has an edge though!

heart82 · 27 June 2011, 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

Both a 210 and a 190. Now that is just crazy!

haha...insanely awesome, isn't it, Mik. I forgot you got both of them...I didn't mean to follow your footsteps, ok! I always thought that you have a 232 n a 190...

bcacncnc · 27 June 2011, 11:34 PM

I prefer the look of the 232, the size of the 190.

Shade · 28 June 2011, 12:26 AM

Thats right Bryan!

B. Doggy · 29 June 2011, 09:56 AM

190 by a hair!!

mfer · 29 June 2011, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by B. Doggy

190 by a hair!!

uhhhhhhohhhhhhhh! bwahahahahahahahahahahaha

View Poll Results: 232 or 190?
232	17	36.96%
190	29	63.04%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

26 June 2011, 08:34 AM	#1
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	232 vs. 190 It has been done with the 312 and 233, but what about these.... Both uber delicious in their own right and chalked full of history & PAM DNA. But which one do you choose?? __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

26 June 2011, 08:48 AM	#2
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Oh man.......... for me 190, but is a tough choice for sure. __________________ member#3242

26 June 2011, 09:37 AM	#3
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	12 views and only 2 votes! __________________ member#3242

26 June 2011, 10:23 AM	#5
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	You know the one I've been hankering for, Mik. However, getting the 190 back in the mix has been something I've considered if I can get the 372. It would be a good way to change things up in the PAM rotation. The second hand and sweeeet 8-day movement..... __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

26 June 2011, 10:21 AM	#4
esm "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: Location,Location Watch: this, bro... Posts: 15,340	On Tapatalk, so can't vote I'd have to go with the 232 since I'm not a big fan of sub dial on Panerai watches....

26 June 2011, 12:07 PM	#6
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	232 only because of the dial and cream letters lol. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

26 June 2011, 01:05 PM	#7
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Tied up! 4/4 __________________ member#3242

26 June 2011, 01:58 PM	#8
TswaneNguni "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: . Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs Posts: 12,609	Order of preference : 249 232 190 However,the margins are VERY small.All great choices

26 June 2011, 02:58 PM	#10
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	made this choice when I picked up the 190 late last year... just a more versatile piece for daily wear.. gold hands+JLC movement = ultimate daily PAM unless you throw the in the 249 into the poll __________________ too much into watches...

26 June 2011, 06:12 PM	#11
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Well, I feel ya Phil, despite liking my 232 very much, I will not turn down a 190 haha. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

26 June 2011, 07:13 PM	#12
swatty 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Peter Location: Sydney Watch: The Game Posts: 17,415	The 190 could be my first Panerai

26 June 2011, 07:14 PM	#13
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	190 for sure! __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

26 June 2011, 09:55 PM	#14
jvo300 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: TX Posts: 1,897	I think the 190 would be more wearable for me given its 45mm dimension.

26 June 2011, 10:25 PM	#15
dukerules "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: NC, USA Posts: 681	My two favorite Rads by a mile. You can't go wrong with either...if I had to choose one, it's the 232, but I'd love to own either. __________________ Instagram: dukerules

27 June 2011, 12:52 AM	#16
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	Wow! To my surprise the 190 is in the lead over the SE... __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

27 June 2011, 01:13 AM	#17
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Yes, amazingly the 47mm is an issue to many.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

27 June 2011, 01:30 AM	#18
mfer "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Real Name: Mik Location: USA Posts: 13,724	Well, 190 is close to SE numbers. Only 2056 made (including the 6 OORs)

27 June 2011, 01:35 AM	#19
MikeJaye Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: London Posts: 675	I must be the only here that doesn't rate the 232. Yes it's got history but it's basically a 210 with gold hands. I chose the 190 due to lovely JLC 8 day movement, 45mm size and seconds sub dial.

27 June 2011, 02:10 AM	#20
dalip "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Dalip Location: Mumbai and Perth Watch: Rolex PAM Omega Posts: 18,656	190 for me also. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ *"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw*

27 June 2011, 03:22 AM	#21
ocwatching "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Phil Location: CA Posts: 5,374	I think it really depends on what your own watch wearing habits and how the 47mm will fit into your collection. I personally will probably keep the 44mm and the 45mm for dailies and the 47mm will be for special GTG or WIS events. To a non-WIS, the 47mm on my wrist is huge. its a win win all around though... __________________ too much into watches...

27 June 2011, 07:47 AM	#23
heart82 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: near my PAM Watch: P-A-M. Posts: 146	After I just got my first rad, the 210, a week ago. Now, If I want another rad, it would have to be something like 190. I just like the sub sec, and power ind in the back.

27 June 2011, 11:34 PM	#27
bcacncnc "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Real Name: Bryan Location: Hong Kong Posts: 1,577	I prefer the look of the 232, the size of the 190. __________________ Omega Panerai Chopard Grand Seiko

28 June 2011, 12:26 AM	#28
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	Thats right Bryan! __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

29 June 2011, 09:56 AM	#29
B. Doggy "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Real Name: Bryan Location: Oregon Posts: 7,399	190 by a hair!! __________________ Rolex / Panerai / Omega

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode