ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
14 July 2011, 12:09 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: nyc
Posts: 6
|
Help me decide!!
Hello all. New member.
What Rolex would you recommend for a 35 year professional who wears the following: Work: Director. Slim dress shirts and dress pants to work (no khakis or ties)- quality sleek dress shoes. Colors are often muted tones of grey, white, black blue, dark brown. No Blazers or Sportcoats. on the weekends : -Pants: Cargo shorts, Dark jeans. -Shirts: Plain tee shirts, sweaters, button up shirts (mostly plain) with sleeves up, polos, -Shoes: Addidas sambas , flipflops, desert boots What would you recommend! and why? I'm trying to debate between SUB-C SS, SUB-C TT, GMT 2C TT, GMT2 C. |
14 July 2011, 06:33 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
Of those i'd choose the TT GMTC. But i would also recommend you to try a DJ or a Daytona as they are a little thinner casewise.
Good luck!
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
14 July 2011, 06:41 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
x2 Thomas, for bis or casual.
__________________
E |
14 July 2011, 06:33 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
|
Of those i'd choose the TT GMTC. But i would also recommend you to try a DJ or a Daytona as they are a little thinner casewise.
Good luck!
__________________
AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection |
14 July 2011, 06:38 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,500
|
I think a GMTC would go nicely..
Shiny ceramic bezel. PCLs to dress it up a bit. Little touch of green with the GMT hand. Works great in any setting...sport, dress, whatever..
|
14 July 2011, 06:45 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: ROLEX, OMEGA
Posts: 279
|
I will go with the Sub...but perhaps 16610 rather than 116610. It is just the perfect size and retains more of the classical look. However the bracelet in 116610 wins hands down.
Your money, your choice!! CHEERS!!
__________________
Rolex Explorer II 16570 Rolex Submariner 16610 Omega Seamaster Professional Titanium 2231.50 Omega Speedmaster Professional 3570.50 |
14 July 2011, 06:48 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: ROLEX, OMEGA
Posts: 279
|
Eddie, your TT GMT is stunning!!
Don't get to see them often in real life....
__________________
Rolex Explorer II 16570 Rolex Submariner 16610 Omega Seamaster Professional Titanium 2231.50 Omega Speedmaster Professional 3570.50 |
14 July 2011, 06:49 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
But the Blue Sub also looks ok.
Damn, they all look good.
__________________
E |
16 July 2011, 03:28 PM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
fantastic looking bluesy!
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
14 July 2011, 06:56 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
Sub C fits all your requirement..
|
14 July 2011, 11:12 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: London
Posts: 28
|
GMTs and Subs with slim dress shirts? Too clunky and ostentatious.
As TSW says, go with a Daytona....beautiful office dress watch... |
15 July 2011, 12:02 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
|
Sub c tt gets my vote.
|
15 July 2011, 12:12 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
|
I reckon SUB-C SS or GMT2 C SS.
Just decide whats more useful to you, GMT function or 300M water resistance. And try them both on and follow your heart. Good luck |
15 July 2011, 12:17 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 89
|
ceramic bezel sub, never lets you down !!
|
15 July 2011, 01:06 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
GMT IIC. Either SS or TT depending on how much flash you want.
__________________
|
15 July 2011, 01:16 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,613
|
From the choices I would go for TT GMT.
|
15 July 2011, 01:08 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: UK
Watch: them come and go
Posts: 689
|
GMT IIc
__________________
John Sub 126610LV incoming GMT 126710 BLRO YM 40 126622 Rhodium IWC Portugieser Automatic 40.4mm - Pink dial |
15 July 2011, 01:22 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 16
|
Hi
37 yrs old I bought my first Rolex - SD 16600 - loved it - perfect with suits and jeans. Fancied a change, bought a GMT IIC 116710 which is great but I'm selling it to go back to the classic SD or a Sub ND - I prefer the more classic, non-maxi dial models - and neither are the pcl's (polished centre links) very me - you can't go wrong with a 16600 or a 14060(M) - although the Sub ND is more a reflection of the old Subs, the 16610 (date model) has become a classic in its own right. the GMT 16710 - 3186 (cal) would be a good buy, too, but pricey nowadays - that said, the SD 16600 and the Sub date are pricey - I think the 14060(M) is a value buy today. I think you carry less risk of making the wrong choice if you go for the non-ceramics as oppose to the new ceramic maxi dial watches. all the above said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and it's so personal - no-one, sadly, can make the choice for you. All the best J |
15 July 2011, 01:31 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Pepsi.
Posts: 5,749
|
Go for the 116713 TT GMT!
__________________
- Adam Instagram: @GMTSUBTIME |
15 July 2011, 02:04 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Sub-Date-C
Posts: 240
|
White Gold Blue Face SubC would work
|
15 July 2011, 02:38 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: gary
Location: Naples,FL
Watch: TT GMTII ,SUB c,
Posts: 337
|
either one |
15 July 2011, 02:45 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
Of the ones you listed... the GMT would fit nicely...
But may i suggest a Milgauss? I think that would fit in nicely with your style |
15 July 2011, 04:48 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: On Earth
Watch: 228238, 114060
Posts: 1,347
|
Sea-Dweller is what you need! If you could have only one watch, the SD is it. Tough as nails, and good for any occasion.
Could never go wrong with Submariner as well. Just my two cents. |
15 July 2011, 09:07 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Junkyard Dog
Location: The Doghouse
Watch: I can't tell time
Posts: 6,822
|
In my humble opinion, the TT GMTIIC is the finest Rolex ever made. It is stunning and fits into any environment.
|
15 July 2011, 09:51 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Matt
Location: London
Watch: Submariner-16610LV
Posts: 1,798
|
Sub-C SS
__________________
Rolex Submariner - 16610LV |
15 July 2011, 10:06 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
Having own multiple Subs including 2 Sub Cs and currently a GMTIIC, I would highly recommend the GMTIIC. Fits with anything. The GMTIIC 100m water resistance is more than anyone needs. Nobody NEEDS the 300m water resistance of the Sub. While the the GMTIIC is 'more blingy" than the Sub which is rather bland, I would not consider it a "blingy" watch. You also get a bit of color with the green on the GMTIIC as well as 3 timezones. And believe it or not, you can use the bezel for timing ALMOST as well as the Sub. The GMTIIC in my opinion, is the best, most practical all around watch Rolex makes.
|
15 July 2011, 11:18 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
tt gmt
|
15 July 2011, 12:19 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Dave
Location: Canada
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,080
|
You should go to your local AD a few times and try on several different models. It will become fairly obvious what the right choice is for you.
|
15 July 2011, 01:04 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
First and foremost welcome to TRF. I would suggest going with a Sea-Dweller. All-time classic, timeless, sophisticated, looks great dressed down or when wearing a black tie. Even better when you are by the sea.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
15 July 2011, 02:17 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
I'd vote Sub C TT!!!!!
Good luck!!!!!!
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.