Is this Z end?

[astcell]

With all the different used Rolexes out there with all the different letters to show when they were made, is the Z going to be the best of the bunch, since it is the last of the old GMT design and represents the end of the old school Rolexes?

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by astcell

With all the different used Rolexes out there with all the different letters to show when they were made, is the Z going to be the best of the bunch, since it is the last of the old GMT design and represents the end of the old school Rolexes?

I don't see how a Z-series Rolex could be the BEST of the bunch. "Z" is just a new letter to declare the start of a new serial number series, that's all!!

In no way would it differ from the quality of say, the previous "D" or "F" or "Y" or whatever.

JJ

[padi56]

Originally Posted by astcell

With all the different used Rolexes out there with all the different letters to show when they were made, is the Z going to be the best of the bunch, since it is the last of the old GMT design and represents the end of the old school Rolexes?

RLEXNCSWTUAPKYFD OR Z the only difference since 1988 except the Daytona,are so minor its not real worth talking about it.The plain fact is one case was stamped a bit earlier/ later than the other end of story.

[Teofilo]

Originally Posted by astcell

With all the different used Rolexes out there with all the different letters to show when they were made, is the Z going to be the best of the bunch, since it is the last of the old GMT design and represents the end of the old school Rolexes?

Robert, I know exactly what you mean, and yes I agree with you.....I can certainly see why people in 10 or 15 years time would ask for or try to collect a Z series sports watch from the "old" line of sports watches.....In fact that is exactly why I was in such a rush to get my two Z's before they were enhanced/upgraded/discontinued.
I dont think it is too much of a jump for people to want "the last of the line".
That has certainly been my experience in collecting other things apart from watches.......broadly speaking people either want the first of a new line or the last of the old line.....just human nature I suppose

[JJ Irani]

I just don't get the logic of all this, guys.

When the "Z" series comes to an end (which shouldn't be too far off now), it will be followed by some other alphabet letter which has not yet been used by Rolex.

So would the next alphabet be the BEST Rolex?

It's just a serial number indicator - that's all - nothing more, nothing less....and in NO WAY reflects on the QUALITY CONTROL at Rolex or the components inside the watch.

JJ

[ohlins]

there are a few owners of new rolex models showing a mix of letters and numerals for their serial numbers.....seems like after Z, it's really the new mix....:P

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by ohlins

there are a few owners of new rolex models showing a mix of letters and numerals for their serial numbers.....seems like after Z, it's really the new mix....:P

I bought a "Z" series Blue Sub in December which is Z-27xxxx.

Two weeks ago I got the new Exp-II which is Z-28xxxx.

Funnily enough, the Sub came with the paper warranty sheet, while the Exp-II came with the new plastic warranty card.

By the same token, guys have purchased newer Z-54xxxx Rollies and have still received the warranty paper.

JJ

[SPACE-DWELLER]

No, but "Z" will be the LAST letter standing sort of speak.

I am not sure whether Rolex has already initiated it, but the "Date Letters" are going to be discontinued so that the Rolex watch will bear a serial number only.

That way, after the Non Date Letter Rolex watches are entering the market, the "Z" will be the "newest and most fresh" Rolex on the Grey Market, if you want to go for a Date Letter Rolex.

So in that way, the "Z" just might become desirable.

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by Spacedweller

No, but "Z" will be the LAST letter standing sort of speak.

I am not sure whether Rolex has already initiated it, but the "Date Letters" are going to be discontinued so that the Rolex watch will bear a serial number only.

That way, after the Non Date Letter Rolex watches are entering the market, the "Z" will be the "newest and most fresh" Rolex on the Grey Market, if you want to go for a Date Letter Rolex.

So in that way, the "Z" just might become desirable.

Thanks, Bo....but can you substantiate this to be a fact?

[SPACE-DWELLER]

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Thanks, Bo....but can you substantiate this to be a fact?

It was mentioned by Rolex at Baselworld 2007.

[Teofilo]

I think the main importance of the Z series will be for the sports/tool/professional watches that are being updated, such as GMT II (old style),Sub non date,possibly the Sub date,possibly the Exp II.........
A Z series watch will signify that point in time when Rolex changed from being a sports watch firm to being a bling watch firm.
I am certainly not criticising the new GMT II, because I love the look of it and will get one when I can, at last, get it at a decent discount...........but it is a new "breed" of watch, more jewellery than rough and ready.....
I'm sure that people will come to appreciate the difference more and more as time goes on.

[mike]

Originally Posted by Teofilo

I think the main importance of the Z series will be for the sports/tool/professional watches that are being updated, such as GMT II (old style),Sub non date,possibly the Sub date,possibly the Exp II.........
A Z series watch will signify that point in time when Rolex changed from being a sports watch firm to being a bling watch firm.
I am certainly not criticising the new GMT II, because I love the look of it and will get one when I can, at last, get it at a decent discount...........but it is a new "breed" of watch, more jewellery than rough and ready.....
I'm sure that people will come to appreciate the difference more and more as time goes on.

Peter that's very well put.

A failing we sometimes have is to view the brand in the microcosm of the hear and now. We tend to forget the history of the brand and where it's been.
In no small measure my love of the acryllic stems from the fact these were the watches I grew up with. They're not "as vintage" to me as to some. LOL!

The current references are the watches most here have come to accept as "their" Rolex.
My guess the new buyers (and some of us more seasoned buyers) will come to accept the new wave of references comming in in due course.
In many ways we are wintess to a new era in the history of Rolex. Some will be good, some will be bad, that's the way of all things.

[Teofilo]

Originally Posted by mike

Peter that's very well put.

A failing we sometimes have is to view the brand in the microcosm of the hear and now. We tend to forget the history of the brand and where it's been.
In no small measure my love of the acryllic stems from the fact these were the watches I grew up with. They're not "as vintage" to me as to some. LOL!

The current references are the watches most here have come to accept as "their" Rolex.
My guess the new buyers (and some of us more seasoned buyers) will come to accept the new wave of references comming in in due course.
In many ways we are wintess to a new era in the history of Rolex. Some will be good, some will be bad, that's the way of all things.

Mike, did you collect most of your watches "at the time", rather than some years later when they had become rarer/more collectable ? If so, it must be a superb feeling to have so many fantastic watches that have been with you "from new".........
I dont think I will ever be a collector of Rolex in the true sense of the word, because I lack the spare funds to build up any sort of collection. I am 39 now and own 2. I would think the most I would reasonably expect to own and keep in my lifetime would be 4 or 5.
Fair play to you for having the foresight and funds to build up such a great collection.

[mike]

Originally Posted by Teofilo

Mike, did you collect most of your watches "at the time", rather than some years later when they had become rarer/more collectable ? If so, it must be a superb feeling to have so many fantastic watches that have been with you "from new".........
I dont think I will ever be a collector of Rolex in the true sense of the word, because I lack the spare funds to build up any sort of collection. I am 39 now and own 2. I would think the most I would reasonably expect to own and keep in my lifetime would be 4 or 5.
Fair play to you for having the foresight and funds to build up such a great collection.

Thanks!

A little of both actually. Certain pieces I have I am the orginal owner. Like most, in those days I certainly wasn't a "collector", but one who simply loved and used the brand.
I did add along the way as resources permitted and later as I became more interested in the history of the brand I looked for those pieces that would "compliment" or "complete" my little group.
Though my humble little gathering can't compare with some of the wonderfull collections I've been fortunate to see, I do take a lot of satisfaction in the fact some of my watches and I have shared some interesting experiences.

[Oyster Lover]

Having been around antiques and collectibles all my life, I can say with a bit of confidence that there are people out there who will pay some kind of a premium for a Z Rollie, where that is the last series made.

For instance, the "old" GMT Z series, will likely fetch some kind of a premium over older models. Whether this premium will translate into "cash", or just more of a willlingness to buy a Z over, say, an earlier model, that remains to be seen. But for an owner of a Z GMT, it's pretty nice to be able to say: This watch is of the last series ever made!

[SPACE-DWELLER]

Originally Posted by Oyster Lover

Having been around antiques and collectibles all my life, I can say with a bit of confidence that there are people out there who will pay some kind of a premium for a Z Rollie, where that is the last series made.

For instance, the "old" GMT Z series, will likely fetch some kind of a premium over older models. Whether this premium will translate into "cash", or just more of a willlingness to buy a Z over, say, an earlier model, that remains to be seen. But for an owner of a Z GMT, it's pretty nice to be able to say: This watch is of the last series ever made!

Haha, I bet you have a Z-series GMT

[Oyster Lover]

Originally Posted by Spacedweller

Haha, I bet you have a Z-series GMT

Absolutely!

And a Z series LV! (I hope they discontinue it soon!)

[Teofilo]

Originally Posted by Oyster Lover

Absolutely!

And a Z series LV! (I hope they discontinue it soon!)

If £3000.00 fell out of a tree tomorrow, I would buy an LV in a heartbeat. It is just a fantastic looking watch. However, as that is fairly unlikely I will just have to be happy with the two that I have got
From other Rolex Forums it looks like the LV will disappear for good when they update the Subdate.........good move getting the LV when you did !

[seanbrooklyn]

from what I hear, a random number will be used after "z" so that only rolex will be able to tell the year, z will be the last models that everyone will be able to tell what year they are from. -Sean

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by seanbrooklyn

from what I hear, a random number will be used after "z" so that only rolex will be able to tell the year, z will be the last models that everyone will be able to tell what year they are from. -Sean

Not necessarily, Sean.

I'm pretty sure, Rolex will come up with some method in this madness manner of determining and establishing a sure-fire date of manufacture from their new system of serial numbering.

JJ

[Andad]

I have always been surprised at the number of genuine Rolex watches that are offered for sale without papers.

Now that I am learning more about Rolex I see that the number (or serial letter and number) on the watch dates the watch within a certain time span and that this can be quite a long time span.

I think we might now see Rolex simply mark the watch with a s/n but it will be the date of sale that dates the watch. This will mean that the plastic card (with purchaser, model number, s/n and date of sale) will now become very important and 'date' the watch exactly with the s/n on the card confirming the watch's ID. The card must now accompany the watch or Rolex would need to certify the authenticity via their records.

[Alcan]

Originally Posted by directioneng

Now that I am learning more about Rolex I see that the number (or serial letter and number) on the watch dates the watch within a certain time span and that this can be quite a long time span.

Conversely, some serial #'s were used for a very short time span. E, X and N serial #'s could all be 1991. Makes me wonder why they did that.

[nko51]

Originally Posted by astcell

With all the different used Rolexes out there with all the different letters to show when they were made, is the Z going to be the best of the bunch, since it is the last of the old GMT design and represents the end of the old school Rolexes?

The Z appears to have the most defects per capita, it may becoming avoided like the plague instead!

[astcell]

Or having a Z series that works is even rarer!

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by astcell

Or having a Z series that works is even rarer!

[Teofilo]

Originally Posted by astcell

Or having a Z series that works is even rarer!

Got two that work like a treat..........
Does anyone have any hard evidence to say if one year would be more or less reliable than any other ?
I think it unlikely that the Swiss would suddenly start turning out shoddy watches
But I am really new at this

[Tools]

Peter,
We're just bashing Z's because they are the latest, and currently the most sought after, serial run. D's were before them; but I hope in most cases it is harmless fun.

Just haveing watched the forums on Rolex the past few years, photography is getting more detailed, and the use a 10X loupe seems to be the latest investigation tool for the watch officianado. Internally they are largely unchanged and very robust.

A few years ago this nit-picking of every visible aspect of a watch was unheard of.

My guess is there is no data base (outside Rolex corporate) for which series may have more returns for defects than others.

Watchmakers have their own opinions of how the new ones compare with older models, but I would let them chime in rather than speculate.

[Teofilo]

Originally Posted by Tools

Peter,
We're just bashing Z's because they are the latest, and currently the most sought after, serial run. D's were before them; but I hope in most cases it is harmless fun.

Just haveing watched the forums on Rolex the past few years, photography is getting more detailed, and the use a 10X loupe seems to be the latest investigation tool for the watch officianado. Internally they are largely unchanged and very robust.

A few years ago this nit-picking of every visible aspect of a watch was unheard of.

My guess is there is no data base (outside Rolex corporate) for which series may have more returns for defects than others.

Watchmakers have their own opinions of how the new ones compare with older models, but I would let them chime in rather than speculate.

Larry, probably the internet and forums like this have got a lot to do with the quality that we now demand from everything.
It is amazing when you think of it that we can see pictures of watches from Singapore,Las Vegas and Australia within 30 minutes of the buyer walking out of the AD. Technology is going far faster than I can keep up with