ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
4 October 2011, 07:13 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
Big dilemma here: I need your feedback about my DJII ...
Hi all,
I need your feedback in order to help me in taking a diffiult decision ... Here is the question: in the past I owned a DJ 16234, that I sold because I felt it too small, not so "solid" and with tiny lugs, so I took the decision to buy the DJII, that I like very much. In the last months I lost a lot of weight, so now also my wrist become thin ... ... Therefore now when I see my DJII on the wrist it seems a bit too larger for me ... Yesterday I went to a watch shop and I tried on the DJ ref. 116200 (they had not the 116234 ...) but it looks a bit too small for me ... Here below several wrist pics of my DJII and the last one with my GMTIIC for size comparison. I forgot to add that my wrist size is 16.5 cm, about 6.5 inches. So the question is: is the DJII too large for me ? Have I to keep the DJII or to sell it and buy the DJ ref. 116234, assuming that the 36 mm is a better size for my wrist ? Anyway the final combo of the 116234 should be the same, I mean black dial with stick markers and oyster bracelet ... Thanks in advance for your input, comments are more than welcome ! Ciao Engi |
4 October 2011, 07:42 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,301
|
it does look a little big, but, not outrageous. if it's a style you like, i say, stick with it.
plus, if you switch to the DJ, what happens when you pick up weight again?? |
4 October 2011, 07:51 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
|
4 October 2011, 07:44 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Barry
Location: Fresno, CA
Watch: GMT II 116710LN
Posts: 31
|
I say wear the watch you gravitate more towards no matter what.
|
4 October 2011, 07:55 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: tolis
Location: athens
Watch: daytona tt
Posts: 194
|
My opinion is that it's ok !36mm watches are for short guys because I am tall with long hands but small wrists and 36mm looks very small on my hands!
|
4 October 2011, 08:27 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Jersey Shore
Watch: Rolex DJ
Posts: 1,905
|
I think the watch looks fine, you have the wrists for a DJII.
__________________
It 10pm do you know where your Datejust is? http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...DA0MC5qcGc.jpg |
4 October 2011, 08:32 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
There's not much difference between the GMTIIC and the DJII.
It's just depends on what you are comfortable with.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
4 October 2011, 08:33 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
|
From the pics if you're going to wear the DJII a lot with shirts and suits I do think that it looks a bit on the big side...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks ------------------------------------------------------------- |
4 October 2011, 08:42 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
|
5 October 2011, 10:23 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
|
Keep the DJII Engi. It's a great watch, as is the GMTc. Both look just fine on your wrist.
|
4 October 2011, 09:32 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
Looks fine to me.
|
5 October 2011, 06:46 AM | #12 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 187
|
I like it...
|
5 October 2011, 06:57 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: netherlands
Posts: 2,177
|
looks fine to me
|
5 October 2011, 07:00 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
Yep, I think it looks fine on you - a nice looking DJII ;-)
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
5 October 2011, 07:00 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: thewatchguy
Location: UK
Watch: me buy gold..
Posts: 7,441
|
Engi.. My wrists are much thinner than yours and I think the DJII looked ok on me. So you have got no problem there. I think it suits you well
Ciao -Dino
__________________
Instagram.. @thewatchguy www.thewatchguyofficial.co.uk Got a GREEN Submariner 116610LV.. Visit the official thread here! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=179580 Don't forget to visit the Rolex & Attire thread too! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=215077 |
5 October 2011, 07:25 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Looks fine to me
__________________
|
5 October 2011, 07:29 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: oklahoma city
Posts: 15,741
|
Engi, this might be a weird observation, but might the watch "wear smaller" if it were slightly higher on your forearm, and away from your hand? Then again, would you have trouble fitting it under your shirt cuff?
Either way, it's a beautiful watch and it looks nice on you. |
5 October 2011, 07:34 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 110
|
Honestly, it looks too big to me. A 36mm DJ would look better IMO.
|
5 October 2011, 09:34 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
|
5 October 2011, 09:42 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: S** ****, C*
Watch: 18**
Posts: 255
|
Go to the store and take a picture of you with the 36mm of your choice. I will give you my advice when you do that. :)
|
12 October 2011, 09:22 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
|
x6 or x7 not sure what we are upto.
I don't really get the DJII, a dressy watch should be elegent, i.e on the smaller side. Think you really need a huge wrist to pull it off. Even if you gain weight again, the DJ 36m will still look fine. Guess it depends what's your style and what you are used to. Good luck. |
5 October 2011, 07:35 AM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
5 October 2011, 07:59 AM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
Quote:
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
|
5 October 2011, 08:21 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
Great suggestion here !
Please keep your feedback going |
5 October 2011, 07:58 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: BondJamesBond
Location: The Algarve
Watch: Rolex or nothing
Posts: 4,081
|
Keep the watch, wear it higher on your wrist, get a new tailor.
And more importantly, keep the weight down.
__________________
♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛ |
5 October 2011, 08:31 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Canada
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 450
|
Thats one fantastic looking watch ! Much better than the older DJ...
__________________
ROLEX1675:126660:226570BL:116613LN:114060 Pam00279 : Pam00270 : OMEGA3861 : Navitimer A23322 : |
5 October 2011, 08:53 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 476
|
It does wear big on you at least thats what the pics show but the current trend is to wear bigger watches so I would just forget about it and enjoy the watch which is a beauty BTW
Best,
__________________
______________________________________________ Rolex Sub 16610. The Classic! Omega Seamaster Chrono |
5 October 2011, 08:57 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
Quote:
Agreed ;-)
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
|
5 October 2011, 09:20 AM | #29 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Paul
Location: Midlands UK
Watch: GMT IIc, Daytona
Posts: 423
|
I was told by my cousin who runs a very established jewellers, that you should be able to see a bit of your arm each side of the watch, if you can't it's too big. I know that fashion has gone for large watches but I honestly think that your DJII looks too big on your wrist. I have a 7.5 wrist and think my GMTIIc is just about right, I came from a Breitling that I felt was too large. Of course it's your choice but you did ask for opinions, sorry if it's not what you wanted to hear.
|
5 October 2011, 09:28 AM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 1,434
|
Quote:
Thanks again Ciao Engi |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.