The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 October 2011, 01:51 PM   #1
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
Price check on these two subs..

I am pondering these two watches at a mid sized family jeweler. Does the 84 watch look like an original dial, and, I am wondering if these prices seem seem reasonable:

(i) approx. 1984 Sub date, no papers, Rolex recent service, polished, nice off white lume dots, case looks excellent, band looks good, but stretched:
$4,200 dollars out the door. 1 year movement warranty

(ii) approx. 2007 Sub date, warranty card from Hong Kong, box, etc. Looks new/mint:
$6,200 out the door. 1 year
Attached Images
   
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 01:53 PM   #2
GFEAR
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: FLORIDA
Posts: 263
its not great, my store would price the 84 below 4k, and give it a 2 year warranty, if its gonna br 4k, its gotta be in the 90's at least, 6200 is too much for a non c sub in my honest opinion.
GFEAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 02:01 PM   #3
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
really..

That's great info. Note that the watches are in California...

Keep the opinions coming, I may crack open the wallet on one of these..
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 02:05 PM   #4
MoBe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 6,773
The `07 is almost 1G over the mark , the `84 not as much but still too much but the dial looks ok.

All in all about what I`d expect from a bricks and mortar retailer.

You can do much better from one of TRF`s sellers.
MoBe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 02:52 PM   #5
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoBe View Post
The `07 is almost 1G over the mark , the `84 not as much but still too much but the dial looks ok.

All in all about what I`d expect from a bricks and mortar retailer.

You can do much better from one of TRF`s sellers.
Right on, these are priced way high unless there's serious negotiating built into these numbers I'd look elsewhere, like here on TRF.
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 03:10 PM   #6
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
i think the 84 is a fair price or say $4000
07 not so much at all
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 03:24 PM   #7
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
4k price...

Quote:
Originally Posted by toph View Post
i think the 84 is a fair price or say $4000
07 not so much at all
Thanks for the input. I really like the faded hour makers and matching faded pearl dot thing on the bezel (not sure what it's called). These vintage features really set this watch apart from the other stainless steel watches I've looked at in person...The only concern I suppose is that it's an older watch, albeit recently serviced.

The plan would be to ultimately use this watch as a weekend Nato strap watch, then continue saving for a a newer GMTII in the spring when I'll have some funds free'd up....Man, I have this Rolex sickness in a bad way...
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 03:50 PM   #8
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
looking closer...

When I blow up the photo from earlier today it sure looks like the hands don't have the same yellowed look as the hour markers...The hands look whiter. So I suppose this could mean that the watch has newer hands installed. Does this hurt the value? Am I slowly turning into a WIS...
Attached Images
 
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 02:07 AM   #9
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbieone View Post
Thanks for the input. I really like the faded hour makers and matching faded pearl dot thing on the bezel (not sure what it's called). These vintage features really set this watch apart from the other stainless steel watches I've looked at in person

you give up the luminescence with the older tritium markers and imho, i don't really think they hit the vintage mark quite on the money, the white gold surround dials don't typically produce the patina that becomes so desirable.

__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 02:37 AM   #10
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
Price

Quote:
Originally Posted by subtona View Post
you give up the luminescence with the older tritium markers and imho, i don't really think they hit the vintage mark quite on the money, the white gold surround dials don't typically produce the patina that becomes so desirable.

Yup, it's definately not a true vintage, but it looks pretty good to me.

Based on what you see here, what's a good price from the buyers standpoint- I was thinking $3,800 out the door ....
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 03:46 AM   #11
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbieone View Post
Yup, it's definately not a true vintage, but it looks pretty good to me.

Based on what you see here, what's a good price from the buyers standpoint- I was thinking $3,800 out the door ....
just do a search on TRF for the past year or two... the prices you'll find here are typically fair.

fyi:
*full service for a sub can be close to $1000 (w new crystal and bezel) at RSC. (mine was $900 last december)
*a stretched bracelet is another $1000 to replace.

i would go for a newer one but not the one you have pictured.



ps if you really are drawn to the vintage markers, have you looked into a 5513??? they are in that price range.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 04:30 AM   #12
Brian J
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Minnesota
Watch: Rolex and Tudor
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbieone View Post
Based on what you see here, what's a good price from the buyers standpoint- I was thinking $3,800 out the door ....
The stretched bracelet and polish are worrisome to me. With cash in hand I wouldn't sweat trying even lower than that to start. 3500, maybe 3400.

I was in your shoes a year ago and I think I offered around 32 I think and the guy didn't throw me out of the store. When they counter don't be afraid to say "thank you but unfortunetely that's not going to work for me" and walk out. You can always come back in an hour and accept.
Brian J is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 03:16 PM   #13
Rags
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
The 07 sub should be around $5200 to $ 5500. $6200 is way over priced.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust
16610 Z Serial Submariner
214270 Explorer

114300 Oyster Perpetual
76200 Tudor Date+Day
Rags is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 06:22 PM   #14
mjrennie
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: MJR
Location: Midlands, UK
Watch: 116618 LB
Posts: 878
There are probably better watches out there that are way better value. In fact, not probably at all, absolutely certainly. I'd keep looking. Use the magic buyers word, ie 'no' and walk away.
mjrennie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 08:59 PM   #15
TSW
"TRF" Member
 
TSW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: TSW
Location: Le Brassus
Watch: Rolex & AP's
Posts: 27,449
Have a look at the deals right here on TRF.
__________________

AP Owners Club
IG @swiss.watch.connection
TSW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 09:00 PM   #16
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
I would keep looking, better deals can be found.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 October 2011, 11:23 PM   #17
dooder202
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Eric
Location: US
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 1,468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbieone View Post
I am pondering these two watches at a mid sized family jeweler. Does the 84 watch look like an original dial, and, I am wondering if these prices seem seem reasonable:

(i) approx. 1984 Sub date, no papers, Rolex recent service, polished, nice off white lume dots, case looks excellent, band looks good, but stretched:
$4,200 dollars out the door. 1 year movement warranty

(ii) approx. 2007 Sub date, warranty card from Hong Kong, box, etc. Looks new/mint:
$6,200 out the door. 1 year
Ge'ez, for that price just get the sub-c for a few hundred more - that is unless you prefer the look of the older once you have pictured/
dooder202 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 02:00 AM   #18
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
Icon14 Agreed

The older sub is more accurately priced. I'll bring some cash and see how much they really want to sell it.

Today could be the day- my first Rolex...!
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 03:50 AM   #19
Oyster1982
"TRF" Member
 
Oyster1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Ed
Location: Jersey Shore
Watch: Rolex DJ
Posts: 1,905
The finish on the 84 Sub seems too shiney. It looks like RSC didnt use the correct buffing wheel on it. The 07 Sub looks good, but not that much less than a Sub c.
__________________
It 10pm do you know where your Datejust is?
http://i1187.photobucket.com/albums/...DA0MC5qcGc.jpg
Oyster1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 03:55 AM   #20
gqllc
"TRF" Member
 
gqllc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Albany NY
Watch: Blue Bezel SubC
Posts: 1,511
Heck for $6200 I will sell you my V series GMT II Ceramic! I will even pay for the shipping!!
__________________
K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC
gqllc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 04:46 AM   #21
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
I think you're better off looking at the for sale section here. IMO you can get a better piece for a better price... Best of luck with whatever YOU decide to do.
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 12:00 PM   #22
Tudor66
"TRF" Member
 
Tudor66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
great deal...

Negotiated a better deal thanks for the great input here. Got verification from my jeweler this afternoon that the paperwork and watch match up. Yes, this is the real deal...

I was mistaken, the 1984 ish watch has all papers, receipts, outer/inner boxes, manual, rolex cloth, proof of Rolex service this summer where it was rebuilt- original dial cleaned, new hands, brought up to spec. Bracelet looks awesome. I really like the fade hour and pearl colors.

I am on cloud nine right now... I love this Sub...
Attached Images
 
__________________
-NAWCC Member
Tudor66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 06:07 PM   #23
mjrennie
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: MJR
Location: Midlands, UK
Watch: 116618 LB
Posts: 878
Quote:
Originally Posted by Newbieone View Post
Negotiated a better deal thanks for the great input here. Got verification from my jeweler this afternoon that the paperwork and watch match up. Yes, this is the real deal...

I was mistaken, the 1984 ish watch has all papers, receipts, outer/inner boxes, manual, rolex cloth, proof of Rolex service this summer where it was rebuilt- original dial cleaned, new hands, brought up to spec. Bracelet looks awesome. I really like the fade hour and pearl colors.

I am on cloud nine right now... I love this Sub...
Excellent. That's all that matters.
mjrennie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 06:11 PM   #24
CEG
"TRF" Member
 
CEG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Dan
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: 116505
Posts: 1,587
Congrats, so long as you're happy, that's all that matters

__________________
16710-116505-116660-116680-116610LV-216570-126331-116710-114060-126621-TudorGMT-Tudor BB58-Sapphire Speedy Pro-Speedy Rising Sun

CEG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 12:11 PM   #25
Mickey®
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
Quote:
Originally Posted by newbieone View Post
i am pondering these two watches at a mid sized family jeweler. Does the 84 watch look like an original dial, and, i am wondering if these prices seem seem reasonable:

(i) approx. 1984 sub date, no papers, rolex recent service, polished, nice off white lume dots, case looks excellent, band looks good, but stretched:
$4,200 dollars out the door. 1 year movement warranty

(ii) approx. 2007 sub date, warranty card from hong kong, box, etc. Looks new/mint:
$6,200 out the door. 1 year



no and no.
Mickey® is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 01:00 PM   #26
imono
"TRF" Member
 
imono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,241
It is alright to pay a little more for what you love.
I am sure many of us have paid a lot more for what we don't love!
imono is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 01:21 PM   #27
mikkolopez
"TRF" Member
 
mikkolopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
the 2007 SubDate seems reasonably priced.

the 1984 is a bit high even if it is vintage, try to get it at 3k or lower then its about right. though am not that much into vintage.
mikkolopez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 07:26 PM   #28
Bertman
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Australia
Watch: Sub-C
Posts: 25
Looks great!
Congrats!!
Bertman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 08:13 PM   #29
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Congrats
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 October 2011, 11:25 PM   #30
Brian J
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Minnesota
Watch: Rolex and Tudor
Posts: 369
Good to hear. It's tough to wipe that grin off you face when you first walk out with a new watch.
Brian J is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.