ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

haakon59 · 30 July 2007, 11:37 AM

This is a new diver from Jaeger LeCoultre, made of titanium, 44mm, and 1000 meter wr. It has a GMT dial but no seconds hand. My understanding is that the rectangular blue/white indicator at the bottom is suppose to tell the diver whether the movement is still functioning correctly, although I don't know how this works. At this point, I don't know what it costs or what the movement is or any of the other relevant details. It looks nice though, I think. What do you think? Hit or miss?

explodingtaco · 30 July 2007, 11:46 AM

It looks unique, I like it.

ianmedium · 30 July 2007, 12:24 PM

I love JLC, just about one of the classiest watch manufactures going IMHO. This one is quite different from their normal look and I think it works, very elegant and simple, very strong and their movements are some of the best in the world, for me JLC has more cachet than Patek!

leopardprey · 30 July 2007, 09:40 PM

Nice, but not having a second hand would drive me crazy.

ADISMO · 31 July 2007, 09:29 AM

im not feeling it. another identity crisis from JLC.

Chad M · 31 July 2007, 09:46 AM

I like it however I dislike how the hands are kinda chopped down "nubby"
Looks clean without the seconds hand but would take some getting used to it.
Wonder what the price tag will read??

ADISMO · 31 July 2007, 09:48 AM

i like the dial and hands personally, just the case of brushed steel (?) sinks it.

Rubenonfire · 31 July 2007, 10:14 AM

It's a cool-looking watch, but I wouldn't own it. I'm with Chad...the no second hand part would drive me nuts.

STB · 31 July 2007, 11:29 AM

I love JLC, innovative, and daring.

But for mechanical diving watches, what else can be done after the launch of the Submariner and Sea-Dweller? The gold standard every diving watch mesures itself today.

Been there, done that, and achieving the depth ratings required on a diving watch is now all too common.

If I'll pit myself against the gold standard of diving watches, I would rather take an aesthetical approach on it's design.

Surely, you can add GMT, chronograph, depth-gauge features. Use materials such as titanium or ceramics. However, these aren't necessary the "genes" of a diving watch.

The only thing I like about the Compressor Diving is the blue luminova.

I would get the Panerai Submersible, or GP Seahawk, or even the IWC Aquatimer before I would consider this one.

mickiratt · 31 July 2007, 11:52 AM

I actually like this one alot. A very functional diver from JLC. The only thing I'd change is of course, to make it in stainless with a bracelet!

30 July 2007, 11:37 AM	#1
haakon59 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Seattle Posts: 1,571	New Jaeger LeCoultre Diver, 1000 meters This is a new diver from Jaeger LeCoultre, made of titanium, 44mm, and 1000 meter wr. It has a GMT dial but no seconds hand. My understanding is that the rectangular blue/white indicator at the bottom is suppose to tell the diver whether the movement is still functioning correctly, although I don't know how this works. At this point, I don't know what it costs or what the movement is or any of the other relevant details. It looks nice though, I think. What do you think? Hit or miss?

31 July 2007, 10:14 AM	#8
Rubenonfire "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Ruben Location: Orange County Watch: 16610LV Posts: 1,317	It's a cool-looking watch, but I wouldn't own it. I'm with Chad...the no second hand part would drive me nuts. __________________ Throw your Rollies in the sky, wave 'em side to side, now keep your hands high.

31 July 2007, 11:29 AM	#9
STB "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Asia Watch: IWC, JLC, Rolex Posts: 90	I love JLC, innovative, and daring. But for mechanical diving watches, what else can be done after the launch of the Submariner and Sea-Dweller? The gold standard every diving watch mesures itself today. Been there, done that, and achieving the depth ratings required on a diving watch is now all too common. If I'll pit myself against the gold standard of diving watches, I would rather take an aesthetical approach on it's design. Surely, you can add GMT, chronograph, depth-gauge features. Use materials such as titanium or ceramics. However, these aren't necessary the "genes" of a diving watch. The only thing I like about the Compressor Diving is the blue luminova. I would get the Panerai Submersible, or GP Seahawk, or even the IWC Aquatimer before I would consider this one. __________________ Assume nothing, question everything.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

30 July 2007, 11:46 AM	#2
explodingtaco "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Mr. Taco Location: Right Behind You. Posts: 913	It looks unique, I like it.

30 July 2007, 12:24 PM	#3
ianmedium Deregistered Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Vancouver Watch: Rolex Datejust Posts: 450	I love JLC, just about one of the classiest watch manufactures going IMHO. This one is quite different from their normal look and I think it works, very elegant and simple, very strong and their movements are some of the best in the world, for me JLC has more cachet than Patek!

30 July 2007, 09:40 PM	#4
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	Nice, but not having a second hand would drive me crazy.

31 July 2007, 09:29 AM	#5
ADISMO Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Real Name: Adrian Location: Cali Watch: Seadweller Posts: 122	im not feeling it. another identity crisis from JLC.

31 July 2007, 09:46 AM	#6
Chad M "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Canada Posts: 230	I like it however I dislike how the hands are kinda chopped down "nubby" Looks clean without the seconds hand but would take some getting used to it. Wonder what the price tag will read??

31 July 2007, 09:48 AM	#7
ADISMO Banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Real Name: Adrian Location: Cali Watch: Seadweller Posts: 122	i like the dial and hands personally, just the case of brushed steel (?) sinks it.

31 July 2007, 11:52 AM	#10
mickiratt Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Steve Location: Canton, Ohio Posts: 162	I actually like this one alot. A very functional diver from JLC. The only thing I'd change is of course, to make it in stainless with a bracelet!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)