The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 13 August 2007, 12:48 AM   #1
ROLEXAHOLIC
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: usa
Watch: 116528
Posts: 376
Icon20 Problem with hands

I have given my father my rootbeer GMT ll - he is 83 years old and he is a former aviator during WWll - he also had his own private plane for some time - and so I thought that this watch would be good for him - as it turns out, he loves the watch, but he is having trouble reading the time because he gets confused with the extra hand. I was going to have the extra hand removed and stored for later use one day. Are there any sugestions or comments ? What would you do ?
ROLEXAHOLIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 12:49 AM   #2
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
i would remove the 24 hour hand but i think that a gmt master II with a removed 24 hour hand would look strange
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 12:59 AM   #3
Letsgodiving
"TRF" Member
 
Letsgodiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
I see no problem removing the hand and holding onto it for down the road. If he loves the watch and that is the only thing that bothers him I say go for it. Your dad sounds like a lucky man.
Letsgodiving is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 01:10 AM   #4
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
I would seek the advice of a watchmaker. I don't know if altering the hand stack would affect how they work
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 01:50 AM   #5
Letsgodiving
"TRF" Member
 
Letsgodiving's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
I would seek the advice of a watchmaker. I don't know if altering the hand stack would affect how they work
If that is a problem could you cut the hand off and just keep the base on the watch and replace it at a later date. I guess you run the problem of not having the original hands so maybe you could get another and cut that and keep the original. It wouldn't be very noticeable IMO.

I would hate to do that to my watch but considering the circumstances it may be an option if just removing the hand will not work.
Letsgodiving is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 01:11 AM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
Is your dad having trouble reading (visually) the GMT, or is he having trouble comprehending what he is seeing ?

My father is 89 and has the beginning of Alzhimers so we keep things as simple as possible for him. We have also provided him with a good Quartz watch since he does not move as much as he did while younger, and an automatic watch is seldom wound fully.

I think removing a hand from a vintage GMT is unlikely to do much except risk the potential loss of an original hand....and defeats the whole prupose of the GMT.

Get your dad a good used, or new 14060M... It will be yours one day, and then you will have a very memorable watch indeed.

Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 01:17 AM   #7
ROLEXAHOLIC
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: usa
Watch: 116528
Posts: 376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
Is your dad having trouble reading (visually) the GMT, or is he having trouble comprehending what he is seeing ?

My father is 89 and has the beginning of Alzhimers so we keep things as simple as possible for him. We have also provided him with a good Quartz watch since he does not move as much as he did while younger, and an automatic watch is seldom wound fully.

I think removing a hand from a vintage GMT is unlikely to do much except risk the potential loss of an original hand....and defeats the whole prupose of the GMT.

Get your dad a good used, or new 14060M... It will be yours one day, and then you will have a very memorable watch indeed.

He is having trouble comprehending what he is seeing and he often mistakes the 24 hour hand for the other hands
ROLEXAHOLIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 11:44 AM   #8
ROLEXAHOLIC
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: usa
Watch: 116528
Posts: 376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Letsgodiving View Post
I see no problem removing the hand and holding onto it for down the road. If he loves the watch and that is the only thing that bothers him I say go for it. Your dad sounds like a lucky man.
Any Rolex watchmakers able to give a technical opinion on this.
ROLEXAHOLIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 12:43 PM   #9
Vanessa CW21
TechXpert & 2016 Patron
 
Vanessa CW21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mx
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLACGC View Post
Any Rolex watchmakers able to give a technical opinion on this.
It's no problem to remove the 24 hour hand. It doesn't harm the watch in any way. Just make sure a skilled watchmaker does it!
I would do the same if it was for my father!

Regards,
Vanessa
Vanessa CW21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 03:43 PM   #10
BiG JeEzY
"TRF" Member
 
BiG JeEzY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanessa View Post
It's no problem to remove the 24 hour hand. It doesn't harm the watch in any way. Just make sure a skilled watchmaker does it!
I would do the same if it was for my father!

Regards,
Vanessa

I would do the same for my father as well if I was faced with the same situation. My father personally did not like the rootbeer GMT because it was also difficult for him to see the time when he tried it on at AD a long time ago. There is not enough contrast in that model. You have yellow gold hands and a brownish dial that kind of camouflages the hands a little bit. As long as Vanessa the watchmaker says that it wont harm the watch, then I also say that its completely okay to do!

__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001)
-Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978)
-Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991)
-Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique
-Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial
BiG JeEzY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 08:51 PM   #11
ROLEXAHOLIC
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: usa
Watch: 116528
Posts: 376
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vanessa View Post
It's no problem to remove the 24 hour hand. It doesn't harm the watch in any way. Just make sure a skilled watchmaker does it!
I would do the same if it was for my father!

Regards,
Vanessa
Thank You for Your expertise Vanessa, I'm going to look into having the 24 hour hand removed. I'll keep the 24 hour hand, so that it may be used sometime in the future. Luckily I have a Rolex trained watchmaker not to far away. Thank You all for your input.

Respectfully,

Richard
ROLEXAHOLIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 01:38 AM   #12
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
You could have that extra hand "blacked out". It would be a simple operation to restore it at a future date...
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 01:48 AM   #13
John685
"TRF" Member
 
John685's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: John
Location: Kansas
Watch: YG DD
Posts: 497
Why not set the extra hand the same as the hour hand. With one on top of the other it might eliminate the confusion.
__________________
Regards,

John


There is never enough time, unless you're serving it.

His:
TT DJ (116233) YG/Oyster/White dial, romans
TT DJ (116231) RG/Jubilee/Black dial, romans
Universal Geneve Polerouter Sub
Hers:
TT LDJ (179171) RG/Jubilee/BMOP dial, romans
John685 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 02:20 AM   #14
Perpetuator
"TRF" Member
 
Perpetuator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: California
Posts: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by John685 View Post
Why not set the extra hand the same as the hour hand. With one on top of the other it might eliminate the confusion.

That wouldn't work because the red hand makes one turn of the dial in 24 hours (i.e., the red hand and hour hand only 'coincide' twice a day).
Perpetuator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 02:14 AM   #15
Erix
"TRF" Member
 
Erix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nice, France
Watch: D Sub date 16610
Posts: 929
Just set the two hands to overlap and that would be the end of this problem.
__________________
Nice is nice

Erix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 03:10 AM   #16
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLACGC View Post
I have given my father my rootbeer GMT ll - he is 83 years old and he is a former aviator during WWll - he also had his own private plane for some time - and so I thought that this watch would be good for him - as it turns out, he loves the watch, but he is having trouble reading the time because he gets confused with the extra hand. I was going to have the extra hand removed and stored for later use one day. Are there any sugestions or comments ? What would you do ?

Difficult! But wouldn't he get used to seeing the difference between the GMT hand and the others, you think?

Anyway, I'd leave it on there! I am not sure, but I don't think the movement would care, if you had it removed, though, since the pin the hands move on would turn anyway.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 03:16 AM   #17
wandyprawira
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: hub
Posts: 520
Trade it in with a ND Sub, maybe? Simplicity is always the best for the elderly.
__________________
wandyprawira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 08:32 AM   #18
Rubenonfire
"TRF" Member
 
Rubenonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Ruben
Location: Orange County
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 1,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
I would seek the advice of a watchmaker. I don't know if altering the hand stack would affect how they work
I'm right here on this one. Obviously it makes sense to remove the hand if there's no functional harm to the watch or the movement in doing so AND you can store that "spare" hand in a place you'll KNOW it'll stay until it's time to replace it.

You may want to consider giving your father a different watch all together. I'm not sure if that's even a possibility but it'll be easier for him and will save you a lot of hassle with your GMT, as well. Win/win!
__________________
Throw your Rollies in the sky, wave 'em side to side, now keep your hands high.
Rubenonfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2007, 08:04 PM   #19
ROGU808
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 288
You're father is a lucky man!!! I'm sure he wants THAT watch!! After all...he got it as a gift from you. I'm sure he wouldn't give it up for any other watch in the world. He may even feel bad that he can't read it correctly.
I'd take Vanessa's advice...remove the 24 hr hand for him.

Good luck with this...
Aloha
ROGU808 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.