ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
24 January 2012, 02:26 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: G
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Watch: Sub N/D
Posts: 35
|
Watch size for next generation
I plan to hand my watches down to my kids when the time is right. With my wrist size, I'm able to wear 40mm-43mm size watches. Now from what I can tell, it looks like my kids will be bigger and taller than I am. So the question is, does a person only buy the biggest possible watch size they are able to wear in order to ensure that the next generation will wear them? It would kill me if the watches were just placed in a safe because the new owners feel the watch is too small. I don't know the specifics, but I know every generations is getting bigger than the previous.
Thanks, G |
24 January 2012, 02:32 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: JS Watch co. 101
Posts: 1,395
|
I think it is unlikely that a watch in the 40-43mm size would be too small on anyone. I hope the trend changes back to smaller watches as I prefer 39mm or smaller.
__________________
JS Watch 101 ▪ Grand Seiko SBGX061 ▪ Breitling A17364
|
25 January 2012, 02:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
I don't think 40mm is too small or will be in the future.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
25 January 2012, 03:12 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
|
The trend is actually reversing. Back in 2008, watches pushing 50mm were fashionable and trendy, but now it is coming back to 42-44mm.
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss “A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson |
25 January 2012, 04:43 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
|
Sorry double posts.
(Happy Chinese New Year)
__________________
Dream the impossible, and make it possible! |
25 January 2012, 04:44 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: planet
Posts: 1,517
|
Yes, absolutely right. For me I think watches should be at 36-46mm range for now and even the future. (only not for Sylvester Stallone)
__________________
Dream the impossible, and make it possible! |
25 January 2012, 05:49 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
|
I think 40 mm to 46 mm. The 50 mm watches are too much for me.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of the Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons - ID # 13 |
25 January 2012, 06:57 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
No idea, but I hoping in 18 to 20 years time, my daughter will appreciate a 42mm watch?
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.