ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

teo · 28 August 2007, 07:34 PM

how many years can Superluminova last does anyone know?

SPACE-DWELLER · 28 August 2007, 07:37 PM

No one knows yet, but it is EXPECTED to last "indefinately" as compared to the Tritium that has a half-life of approx. 12,5 years.

BiG JeEzY · 28 August 2007, 07:39 PM

I believe that superluminova lasts indefinitely as I have read before. There is no known "time frame" for how long it will last like what tritium had.

It just needs a light source to charge up the superluminova each time. I have NOT noticed any dimming of the Superluminova on my watches in case you were wondering.

frostie · 28 August 2007, 09:20 PM

I prefer the superluminova to tritium

Tombstone · 28 August 2007, 09:56 PM

Velitsko
I strongly agree with you it is just a far better product.

frostie · 28 August 2007, 10:48 PM

It is brighter stronger and charges quickly. The only thing left for rolex is to equip all their watches with maxi dial. I guarantee you that you will be able to see the time after 8 hours of total darkness really easily.

28 August 2007, 07:34 PM	#1
teo "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: amk Posts: 792	Superluminova how many years can Superluminova last does anyone know?

28 August 2007, 07:37 PM	#2
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	No one knows yet, but it is EXPECTED to last "indefinately" as compared to the Tritium that has a half-life of approx. 12,5 years. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

28 August 2007, 07:39 PM	#3
BiG JeEzY "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Jerome Location: N. California Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ Posts: 3,351	I believe that superluminova lasts indefinitely as I have read before. There is no known "time frame" for how long it will last like what tritium had. It just needs a light source to charge up the superluminova each time. I have NOT noticed any dimming of the Superluminova on my watches in case you were wondering. __________________ -Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

28 August 2007, 09:20 PM	#4
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	I prefer the superluminova to tritium

28 August 2007, 09:56 PM	#5
Tombstone "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Real Name: Richard Location: LV, NV Watch: LV Sub and others Posts: 2,689	Velitsko I strongly agree with you it is just a far better product.

28 August 2007, 10:48 PM	#6
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	It is brighter stronger and charges quickly. The only thing left for rolex is to equip all their watches with maxi dial. I guarantee you that you will be able to see the time after 8 hours of total darkness really easily.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)