ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
11 March 2012, 03:18 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 41
|
114060 Order thread
Okay, I'm going to get this thread going.
Ordered today (Bristol, UK)10th March 2012. Been given provisional delivery date of September 2012. Add your order dates to this thread and we will see who gets there new Submariner first. |
11 March 2012, 12:34 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Out of curiosity, did they require a deposit and, if so, do you mind telling us how much?
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
11 March 2012, 12:38 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
x2
__________________
|
11 March 2012, 12:44 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,426
|
I am anxious to know how well the 114060 will sell now that it will only be a few hundred less than a 116610...???
|
11 March 2012, 12:50 PM | #5 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Quote:
I think it's a long shot. My AD's staff think it will be a hit and will sell as well or better than the 14060M for all the same reasons that the 14060M sold. Of course, I don't think the Submariners were the hottest sellers in the line Rolex watches, including the Sub-Dates.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
11 March 2012, 07:09 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 41
|
They did want a deposit, so I left £500 with them. Also price is said to be £4930 including tax at 20%. AD will confirm price closer to release date.
I can't wait. |
11 March 2012, 07:25 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jeff
Location: New Zealand
Watch: Rolex DSSD
Posts: 1,426
|
Boring watch...it's the same Sub with a ceramic bezel. Not interested. I have the 14060M and very happy with it.
|
11 March 2012, 11:15 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Arthur
Location: Manila
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 278
|
As much as I really, really like the new Sub ND, I won't put my money down on it before I can try it in person.
|
11 March 2012, 11:26 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,303
|
Rolex is basically saying "you want a Submariner, pay X".....The date is just an option for a little more. Up to the consumer if cyclops plus date is important, but, either way, it's a Submariner first and foremost.
I don't think just because they are priced similarly one will automatically opt for the date. There's something to be said for the symmetry and cleaner lines of the ND. |
12 March 2012, 01:40 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Switzerland
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
The new Sub 114060 has a symmetrical dial with the beauty of it's lume that cannot be beaten. Unfortunately I need a date, otherwise I would immediately go for the Sub ND because of its beauty! Tom |
|
12 March 2012, 01:43 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: MI
Posts: 42
|
How long do orders typically take on *current* models? I went to the AD to put a deposit down on a 116610LV... He didn't give me a really good answer on when mine would be in. Sounds like 4 - 6 weeks... Seems so far off.
|
12 March 2012, 01:53 AM | #12 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
Omega planet ocean IWC Aquatimer IWC mark 16 Breitling colt superocean Bell & Ross 123 vintage. I did look at the 14060 but I was disappointed with the clasp. I know there are a lot of people who are not impressed with the new Sub, but for me it delivers what I need. Now roll on September, unless it comes in earlier. |
|
12 March 2012, 03:23 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
I just don't understand placing a order. I just call my AD and say "put me down for one when they arrive". I never give them money before I get the watch, and I would never pay the MSRP once it arrives.
__________________
My grails: |
12 March 2012, 03:34 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
I'd say you have a pretty good relationship with your AD.
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
12 March 2012, 03:35 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
So, if there is another price increase when it hits the ADs, will your AD till honor the £4930 price which you have secured by putting don a deposit for?
|
12 March 2012, 04:57 AM | #16 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
The AD is confident that the final price will be released soon, so if I hear anything I will post it. I'm hoping that the Government reduces vat in the budget, but there is more likelihood of the Locus Ness monster being found. |
|
12 March 2012, 05:31 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lancashire
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 100
|
I think you mean Loch Ness
|
12 March 2012, 07:33 AM | #18 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Quote:
(it has happened before, hence almost every AD will not take deposit to "lock in the price") |
|
12 March 2012, 07:47 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Watch: 16613 16710 16600
Posts: 1,021
|
I was bitten by the price rise for the new Exp II 42 last year.
When it was announced, it was one price but when it arrived in the UK shops the price had risen for no good reason. At the time it was thought that a UK Rolex price rise was on the cards and the new watch was being released at the inflated price and then the rest of the range were going to follow on. Here in the UK, the price rise did not occur and so the Exp II 42 seems expensive compared to GMT and Sub. Peter |
12 March 2012, 07:50 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
Quote:
|
|
12 March 2012, 12:45 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: U.K
Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C
Posts: 2,178
|
Strange that you had to put a deposit down.
When I put myself down for the Sub-C I just rang around and put my name on waiting lists. No deposit. When one came in the AD rang and asked me if I wanted it. I went straight to the AD and bought it. |
12 March 2012, 12:49 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Maui
Watch: Patek
Posts: 2,032
|
i got on a list today, left CC number, promised list price
|
12 March 2012, 12:56 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Southern Maryland
Watch: 14060M, 116613LB
Posts: 389
|
What was the promised list price, if you don't mind me asking Greg?
__________________
Lug Hole Commando |
12 March 2012, 01:19 PM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Money talks.
I put down 50% on both my 116200 and my 14060M. The ADs probably won't need a lot of incentive, beyond that which Rolex provides, to stock the reference, but having some money on the line never hurts to make sure you're the one that gets the call.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
26 March 2012, 05:13 AM | #25 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 41
|
Latest update:
Voicemail left for me today 25th March. Price has now been quoted at £4960 including vat at 20%. Delivery quoted as July. The wait continues... |
26 March 2012, 05:21 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
|
I was at AD on Friday and went on the waiting list for 14060M. Not sure I'll be successful as they're as rare as rocking horse s**t in UK ADs.
I tried the Sub C date but it seemed big and cumbersome. I hope the 114060C seems less so.
__________________
Lest we forget. |
26 March 2012, 05:44 AM | #27 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 41
|
Quote:
Ask for Mo, he's very helpful. |
|
26 March 2012, 06:06 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
|
Quote:
In fairness I tried on a couple of others that really hit the spot, one being DJII 116334 so if the sub doesn't come off I've options.
__________________
Lest we forget. |
|
6 June 2012, 02:02 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Scott
Location: California
Watch: 114060
Posts: 229
|
I'm on the waitlist, but AD either didn't have it or forgot to call me back, with the release date. Anyone out there heard rumblings when this should hit the shelves stateside?
|
6 June 2012, 02:51 PM | #30 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
Quote:
The 3 ADs I do business with have more requests for the YM and DJ than the 114060. 1 has 2 deposits for a SkyDweller and only 1 for the ND SubC whack has really shocked me. I don think it will come close to the sales of the 116610. I think it's a huge improvement over the 14060 as it was very dated IMHO but just don't see it being a huge seller but I'm sure it will sell ok but for the price I see no reason not to get the date model. In recent years I've been told the date model has outsold the ND model by a 3-4x as many units sold. I don't know this as fact just what the ADs I use have told me. It will be a hot seller at first but after those that await release get theirs I think it will sell less than the GMTII, SubC date, and ExpII. I could be off but I don't see it flying off the shelves. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.