ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
13 September 2007, 07:24 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: switzerland
Posts: 196
|
Question for physicists. Winding in space?
A question for physicists.
Would a Rolex wind in space? I think that it would: the wrist and arm would impart (centrifugal?) force to the winding mechanism in the same way as on Earth. Gravity is not needed. Is this indeed the case? |
13 September 2007, 07:32 PM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
Quote:
I am still studying Physics (Mechanics of Fluids and Solids) so I cant give you a physics based answer just yet. However I will say that a watch with an automatic winding mechanism will NOT be able to wind in space. The Omega watches that went up to the moon before in the late 1960's had manual winding movements in them because of the reason that the rotor from an automatic watch will not be able to oscillate as effectively when the watch is in space. If I am not mistaken, in space, the rotor will not oscillate in the same manner as it will on Earth.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
|
13 September 2007, 07:36 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
|
No. Rolex Watches have gone in space before and the Perpetual Motion of the Rotar does not work, cause it is gravity driven. GMT II worn on Apollo 13. When using Rolex in space, you must manually wind about every day and a half.
This is one reason why the Omega Speedmasters designed originally for NASA were all Manual Wound watches |
13 September 2007, 07:46 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
|
However there is still gravity in space since planets are able to stay in orbit (the idea that you are weightless and constantly falling in space), just less than there is on Earth (gravity pulls you to the center of the Earth but the Earth stops your fall.)
So the rotor should still be able to wind the watch somewhat since it is gravity driven and there is some gravity in space, just not as effectively as it normally does on Earth and not effectively enough to keep to watch running. It will eventually just stop if you just wear it on your wrist all the time in space. A Rolex can still be manually wound though so you can go up to space and wear it without having any problems.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001) -Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978) -Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991) -Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique -Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial |
13 September 2007, 07:55 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
The gravity in space is best described as 'ambient' gravity, ie strong enough to keep you in orbit, but not enough to provide the required effect on Earth-bound mechanisms such as the rotor which is designed to work under the gravitational conditions on the surface of the Earth.
This reply is a bit ad hoc, but I hope it conveys the idea. |
13 September 2007, 09:39 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: switzerland
Posts: 196
|
... and what about inertia?
If I move my wrist, won't the rotor tend to remain, unmoved? Thus making it 'turn', relative to the rest of the mechanism. A bit like the coffee in a cup: turn the cup and the liquid remains in its original position. (Guys, this means 'turn in the plane parallel to the surface'!) |
13 September 2007, 09:54 PM | #7 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Quote:
Rotors are influenced by gravity but more so by inertia, the tendency of an object in motion to remain in motion. Witness the infamous "J.J. brandy swirl" when restarting a Rolex after it's run down. Gravity has nothing to do with that. Nasa assumed (incorrectly) that an automatic watch wouldn't work in zero gravity. From TimeZone: "In 1965 NASA purchased five reputable chronographs (one of which was the Speedmaster) from several jewellery stores in Houston. NASA then proceeded to abuse the watches with tests of extreme environmental conditions. Their aim was to determine if a suitable watch was available for their Space Program. The final three contenders for the "Official" NASA chronograph were a Rolex, Longines Wittnauer and the Omega. The reasons for the Rolex's departure were that it stopped running on two occasions during the Relative Humidity Tests and subsequently failed during the High Temperature Test when the sweep hand warped and was binding against the other hands on the dial. No other tests were run with the Rolex Chronograph." From WIkipedia: "Reportedly NASA assumed that the automatic winding mechanism was based on pendulum action like Harwood's original design, requiring either a gravity field or constant acceleration. The weightless environment therefore raised doubts about the ability of an automatic watch to wind itself. In fact a full 360-degree winding mechanism should work even better in low or zero gravity, where the friction experienced by the mechanism is lower. The rotor can thus move longer and transfer more energy into the spring. The rotor is in any case easily activated by momentum and not dependent on gravity."
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
|
13 September 2007, 10:03 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Excellent post, Al!
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
14 September 2007, 01:37 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
Why would friction be any less in a zero gravity environment? I'm just working from deduction here, as something like Velcro is friction dependent, and it's used extensively as a secure fastening system in space missions...
|
14 September 2007, 02:12 AM | #10 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: switzerland
Posts: 196
|
A heavy brick will stick more than a light one. And it is heavy becasue of gravity.
With no gravity, it will 'float' above the surface. |
14 September 2007, 02:29 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
|
14 September 2007, 03:50 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: California
Watch: Rolex Sea-Dweller
Posts: 26
|
The friction force is a function of the coefficient of friction of the materials and the normal force. I would think the coefficient of friction remains constant, whether on earth or in space. However, it's true that if the normal force is mainly gravity, such as a brick on a table, then yes, the overall friction force would be less in space. But, if the normal force is from a spring mechanism and independent from gravity.. then I would think the friction would be the same in space as it would be on earth...
|
14 September 2007, 04:11 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: hub
Posts: 520
|
Gravity is just a matter of downward force. Say, if the watch is in space, it means the rotor will only spin if it's given a force, for example: from JJ's brandy shake-like movement. After the force is given, the rotor would continue to spin forever in zero gravity condition unless there was any other force applied in the direction opposite to the rotor movement. This force does exist which is the friction inside the movement itself. At the end, the rotor will stop moving shortly due to friction.
Whereas on earth, the rotor will spin on vertical plane once in a while due to the force it receives from gravity which keep the watch wound everytime. I would say, just a pure automatic watch will not work in zero gravity condition. Perhaps I am mistaken...
__________________
|
14 September 2007, 04:18 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: hub
Posts: 520
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.