The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 25 March 2012, 07:44 AM   #1
topcat28
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Help! Too confused...

Firstly, hello! This is my first post, so please be gentle. And I'll apologise now if I ramble...

I've been lurking for a while, and learnt a lot. But not, it transpires, enough!

I've been looking today at a potential purchase for my girlfriend. Its from a 'reputable' jewellers, but not one that specialises in high end watches. It doesn't have paperwork or boxes, but seems to be in excellent condition. It has apparently been serviced recently, they will show me the paperwork. It will come with a 2 year warranty - that I'm happy will be honoured.

So, what (I think) I know: Its a 'mid size' (I assume) 29mm (29.9mm?) steel Oyster. It has an Oyster strap which seems to be in good condition, and an off-white (silver?) face. From memory I can't remember if its a rivet strap - I think not.

Its face is marked ROLEX OYSTERDATE and PRECISION, with T Swiss T at the bottom.

What confuses me, is that it is self winding. Everything I have read says that OYSTERDATES are not.

So, confused.com. Sadly I didn't have my phone with me to take a picture, which the chap even suggested.

One thing occurs to me - it's not self winding, and the jeweller is wrong! It certainly started working on movement, but could a manual watch find a last little bit of energy if agitated?!

Thank you for getting this far! Any clarity would be much appreciated...
topcat28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 March 2012, 11:59 PM   #2
swish77
2024 Pledge Member
 
swish77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,999
There are plenty of people here who would be happy to help you, but you've got to post some photos. Go back with a phone/camera or have the seller take some. Also, a model number would help, along with the beginning of the serial number for dating purposes. Good luck!
swish77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2012, 06:52 AM   #3
HunterST
"TRF" Member
 
HunterST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Eli Weisman
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 1675/3, 79090
Posts: 442
Sounds like a 6694 Precision Oysterdate - which is definitely manual wind. You'll have to post pictures of the case, dial, bracelet clasp (with numbers) as well as the back and movement if they'll open it up for you. What is their approx asking price?
__________________
....................
GMT 1675/3 | 6694 | 16014 Tapestry Cream | 16014 Tapestry Gray | Tudor Black Bay Black ETA | Tudor Sub 79090 | Sinn 103 StSa | PAM 183 | IWC 3717-04
HunterST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 March 2012, 08:08 AM   #4
topcat28
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Thanks guys! Certainly looks like a 6694. I've attached a pic of something similar - as far as I can remember it.

Will hopefully get the model and serial numbers tomorrow, perhaps with some more information.

The jeweller was convinced though that it was a self winder - and as I say, it started on agitation.

I'm ashamed (on here) to say that I'm an Omega chap. I have an automatic (co-axial?) Seamaster and an old (1953) manual wind military. Its pretty obvious with these, even to me, that one is a manual. Is the same true for Rolex - or does the manual wind also have a screw in crown?

If it all looks good, I'll pop back and try and take some pics. Price wise, its a tad over $2k, which looks a bit rich from what I've been able to learn from here. But it is (or appears to be) in lovely condition, and finding ladies' (mid) sized watches seems tricky...
Attached Images
 
topcat28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 March 2012, 08:58 PM   #5
topcat28
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Okay, only the watch itself, but at least this is the actual watch!

Hoping to get numbers etc. today, but in the mean time, I have to admmit - this looks like a manual wind. BUT I was convinced (at the time) it was an auto...
Attached Images
 
topcat28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2012, 12:31 AM   #6
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
It appears the 6694 should have the 1210 movemnet which is manual wind-

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-...swk&Rolex_1210

Be careful on this one since the jeweler doesn't seem to know his watches 100%
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2012, 01:22 AM   #7
topcat28
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 17
Or not at all it transpires...

Definitely a manual wind. Don't know how they could be so wrong. And feel a bit daft myself for not realising, or thinking to check properly.

Learn't something though. A manual wind watch will give up a last bit of tension in its spring if shaken...

Thanks for all the help. Back to the drawing board though. Lovely though it is, after an automatic movement.
topcat28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.