ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 May 2012, 08:52 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Billy Mac
Location: DFW, Tejas
Posts: 120
|
GMT 16710 - To lughole or not to lughole
I need some advice with my next Rolex purchase. I'm having the hardest time deciding if I should purchase the GMT 16710 Pepsi with lugholes or without.
What are advantages of both? Just an FYI, I am looking at K and Z serials respectively. Thanks All! Bmac |
29 May 2012, 09:21 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: Ohio
Watch: 1680
Posts: 342
|
I'm also looking at a GMT Master with lug holes. I really like the lug hole version as it looks more like a vintage case! Good luck!
|
29 May 2012, 09:26 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Some feel bracelets / straps are easier to change with Lug Holes. Some also feel Lug Holes are more "secure."
Some like the look of holes on a sports watch. I think it's more a matter of preference. What do you think??? |
29 May 2012, 09:38 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Disneyland, Calif
Watch: 20th Moon, ND Sub.
Posts: 931
|
|
29 May 2012, 09:27 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
|
Holes.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44 |
29 May 2012, 12:36 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,294
|
Attention Montres Rolex....please bring back lug holes!
The new Tudor watches now come w/ extra straps...very cool....but no lug holes & IMHO a PITA to take bracelet off. Please bring back the holes!
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
29 May 2012, 12:42 PM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
As Dan mentioned earlier, I too like the lug holes and SEL bracelet..
However, in this case, the condition of the watch should be the deciding factor... Get the very best condition for the price..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
29 May 2012, 01:53 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
|
X2. Would depend on the individual watch. Personally it wouldn't sway me one way or the other. I'd buy the newest/nicest watch I could afford so it would probably not have holes.
|
29 May 2012, 09:30 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: AZ
Watch: This, Hold my Beer
Posts: 369
|
Holes for sure, it makes the swap to nylon that much easier!
__________________
Regards: MJK |
29 May 2012, 09:34 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: Wall Street
Posts: 9,954
|
I like the lug holes for the 16710!!! The dimples show character!
__________________
"Wealth is of the heart and mind, not of the pocket!" "A Watch Is An Emotional Object, And So, It Is The Responsibility Of The Brand To Create Emotion Through It's Products" - Georges Kern "In the 1950s and 60s, they made the Ref 8171, which is a cult collectible—now that’s the ultimate Rolex you could own with a calendar and a moon phase.” - John Reardon "Heh, heh, heh..." - Michael Kilyung |
29 May 2012, 09:36 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Australia
Watch: Rolex.Tudor.PAM
Posts: 1,554
|
I have a 16710 with LH's and a Exp II without LH's.
If I changed the bracelets & straps out on a regular basis the lug holed case would make this a little easier. It's going to boil down to your personal preference. Good luck. |
29 May 2012, 09:42 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Billy Mac
Location: DFW, Tejas
Posts: 120
|
@Speed, I really do like both which makes my decision that much harder
I didn't think about the ease of changing out bracelets/straps though. Definitely something to consider as I do like Nylon straps. |
29 May 2012, 09:54 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: On Earth
Watch: A Few
Posts: 1,510
|
lug holes all the way!
|
29 May 2012, 09:38 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Pepsi.
Posts: 5,749
|
Lug holes are good! Go for them! You don't see lug holes on current Rolex's anymore!
|
29 May 2012, 09:38 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
Vote for HOLES
|
29 May 2012, 09:56 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
I've had a Z with no holes & a K with holes. I'm not one to change the bracelet, ever, so I'll take the newer watch please. I've heard the holes makes it more of a tool watch but frankly its hard to even notice.
|
29 May 2012, 10:36 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
My K series has both lug holes and SEL's, the best of both worlds.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
29 May 2012, 11:05 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 792
|
I'm torn on this question. I prefer the look of no lug holes, but I do love the simplicity of strap changes with lug holes.
|
29 May 2012, 11:17 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Watch: Rolex - a few!
Posts: 1,472
|
Lug holes! YES!!
|
29 May 2012, 11:57 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Harold
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 834
|
No holes
|
29 May 2012, 12:29 PM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Lug holes will be found on an older GMT. I guess you'll have to decide how old of watch you want. Personally, I prefer the older, lug hole watches.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
29 May 2012, 12:30 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Rich
Location: NC
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 2,359
|
Lug holes it's a sports watch
__________________
Rich Member of Nylon Nation Red Sox Nation Instagram watchguy97 |
29 May 2012, 01:51 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 272
|
I say go for the lugholes.
|
29 May 2012, 02:03 PM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tyler
Location: Hill Country, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 496
|
lug holes and SEL =)
|
29 May 2012, 02:11 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
I like it without
|
30 May 2012, 12:40 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
Lug holes are cool and make a bracelet swap, easy........
|
30 May 2012, 01:58 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
lug hole action for me...
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
30 May 2012, 03:04 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
|
I love my lug hole/SEL GMT!
__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52 |
30 May 2012, 03:10 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
|
If you plan to keep it on the oyster bracelet then I vote no. If you plan to swap bracelets to a jubilee and/or natos then find one with lug holes.
|
30 May 2012, 03:14 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Johan
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 150
|
Sorry, but what does SEL stand for? :)
__________________
There's no such thing as a free lunch 114060/126710/16030 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.