ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
14 June 2012, 11:14 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California
Posts: 39
|
If you could only have TWO- which ones?
My wife layeth the smacketh down. I have learned who wears the pants in this household.
She freaked out about my burgeoning watch collection, and told me to pare it down to 2 "nice" watches. I can have watches beyond that, but they'd have to be something along the Hamilton, Seiko price range. And that was after I negotiated it up from just ONE nice watch - my wife just couldn't understand why I needed another watch beyond my beloved Sub. I actually told her " I want a nice watch to wear whenever the other one is in service!", so she said fine, you have have two. So for now I have a Sub and a preloved DJ I just picked up. But it's fun to daydream. If you could only have two "nice" watches (Rolex or otherwise), which ones would you get? The rub for me is that I have so much sentimental attachment to the Sub that watch is going NOWHERE. So basically I'd only have room to eventually trade out the DJ. |
14 June 2012, 11:22 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
Maybe keep the watches and trade your wife . . . ;-)
Just joking Go for a grail ! HAGOne |
14 June 2012, 04:06 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,297
|
[QUOTE=Kingair;3357100]Maybe keep the watches and trade your wife . . . ;-)
X2
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
14 June 2012, 04:53 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: U.K
Watch: Milgauss GV, Sub-C
Posts: 2,178
|
Sub and GV.
|
14 June 2012, 06:28 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Just sport/pro models: Sub C LN and Exp II (42mm)
Need a dress(ier) watch?: Sub C LN and DJ II
__________________
|
14 June 2012, 10:44 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dustin
Location: USA
Posts: 1,980
|
My two watches hold a lot of sentimental value so I could never part with either. I guess if I had to pick two then Im right where I need to be…
|
15 June 2012, 02:09 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Andy
Location: East Midlands, UK
Watch: Patek and Rolex
Posts: 1,074
|
|
14 June 2012, 11:22 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Pepsi.
Posts: 5,749
|
I would actually be fine with just one watch, being it a 16610 Submariner Date. But since you said two, it'd be a 16610 and a 16710 Pepsi GMT.
|
14 June 2012, 11:27 AM | #9 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 26
|
I agree, I think one is perfectly okay. I personally prefer the versatility of the 116509 Daytona but if money wasn't an issue, I would also get the 218239dd with diamond dial for playing dress up
|
14 June 2012, 11:23 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 47
|
I have DJ now. My 2nd one will be ss Daytona,I really fall in love this watch,both!
|
14 June 2012, 11:27 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
I'd call that a predicament, but the majority of men live within such constraints.
Personally, I think a Sub and a DJ is a nice combination of watches to own and if I were to be in such a position, that's what I'd go with, but thank God I am not, because I'm not getting rid of my Explorer for love nor money.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
14 June 2012, 11:31 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Get a DD and keep the Sub.
|
29 August 2012, 11:33 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sea Level
Watch: Varies
Posts: 6,877
|
My thoughts exactly only I'd make it a DDII!!
__________________
Instagram @z32turbo |
2 November 2013, 02:12 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
This....but I'd keep my SD instead of the Sub.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
2 November 2013, 03:04 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
There's a far easier choice you could make, wife or happiness??
That aside, it's a good question...I'm in the process of bringing my collection down to two watches plus a G-Shock... My choices are: - Sea Dweller 16600 (which I have already) - Sub 116613 TT LB which I will be collecting on 4th December I will be wearing the Sub for smart wear (work or social) and the Dweller for general wear (casual social, sport, mucking about in the field on the tractor etc). The beauty of this combination, is that if I'm going away for a few days where I will be both smart and casual, both watches will actually suit all scenarios. The G-Shock (new Rangeman, also collecting in December), will be used for hardcore drinking, building, or general mucking about. When I'm older, I will likely trade the Sub for the Patek Rose Gold 5712 which is my grail watch...but it doesn't suit me yet, so need to wait a few years. I really like the Day Date, but that doesn't suit my looks or personality...I think that all too often people buy watches they like the look of without giving thought to what they will look like on them! What all this does mean, is that I will be saying goodbye to my limited edition Bremont MB2, my Baume and Mercier Riviera, and my Tag Microtimer, along with some other less good pieces...all very sad, but time to move on... My wife is very good and I can buy whatever I want, but my motivation is simplicity...I don't like clutter, too many possessions, or anything that complicates life in any way without giving enough reward. My Rolex gets 95% of wrist time and as such, the other watches are just a complication (storage, insurance, servicing etc) that gives me a little bit of satisfaction once in a while. I need a bit of strange / variation, but not as much as I currently have. |
2 November 2013, 03:32 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
|
I am lucky that I already have "my two" in my collection. Both are classics with plenty of heritage and no date to faff about setting.
__________________
|
14 June 2012, 11:33 AM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: California
Posts: 39
|
The other bad thing about this for me is that I feel constrained to 1 brand. Cause if I look at another brand (I like Omega), then it snowballs and I start looking at other similar brands - IWC, Breitling, etc.
If I just focus on the universe of 1 brand (hopefully Rolex!) then it at least kind of keeps me focused. |
14 June 2012, 11:35 AM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
I'd take a vintage GMT and a Submariner!
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
14 June 2012, 11:51 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Q
Location: The Q Continuum
Watch: ST:TNG
Posts: 8,466
|
Your wife is correct of course, but you shouldn't stop there. You should go into her jewelry drawer(s) tonight and pull everything out. Then tell her she can keep two pieces of each kind, e.g. two pairs of earings, two bracelets, two necklaces, two rings, etc. Then go into her closet and take out all her shoes and purses. Tell her she can keep two pairs of shoes and two purses.
|
14 June 2012, 03:46 PM | #20 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Cordelia, CA
Posts: 109
|
Yep
Quote:
|
|
14 June 2012, 11:08 PM | #21 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
|
Quote:
|
|
15 June 2012, 02:40 AM | #22 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Jeremy
Location: Chicago suburbs
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
Another way to circumvent this problem is for you each to have your own "play money accounts." From each paycheck, you each get $xxx to spend on WHATEVER YOU WANT. No permission is necessary. She can get all the mani/pedis and purses she wants, as long as she doesn't spend the house money, and you can get as many fine watches as you want with that money. How it works with my wife and I is that we each have our own habits. She's a saver, and has thousands of bucks in her account, and she cries a little inside each time she has to spend HER money on something. Thank GOD it is not all in one account, as I'm completely opposite. I've only had more than $1,000 once in the 8 years we've been married, and it was after I'd sold a $650 watch. OK, now to answer the question. The two fine watches I'd have would be a classic Breguet with the guilloche dial, roman numerals, and no complications. Not even a seconds hand. Yellow gold on a glossy brown strap of some kind. That'd be my dress watch. For my casual watch, I'd probably have a modern Datejust in stainless, smooth bezel, blue dial, roman numerals. Watches in the Seiko price range would handily fill out the collection. I'm a member over at Poor Man's Watch Forum, and I think some of you might be shocked at how much watch one can get for under $1k. For instance: - a Vostok Amphibia for $75 shipped from the Ukraine. Great watch, and funky vintage design and communist styling. - Bernhardt watches are great values too, and most (all?) of them have sapphire crystals. I have a Binnacle Anchor, which is about a $200 watch. Non-hacking, unidirectional automatic winding, hand-winding Miyota movement and exemplary build quality. The bracelet is Rolex class, and the case is designed so there is no gap between the strap and the case. The dial kind of resembles that of an Air-King with the Explorer numeral layout. - A Seiko SKX007K driver is a fine example of the breed. When the "Hardlex" crystal gets scratched up, simply swap it out for a sapphire aftermarket one. With some patience, they can be regulated to run to COSC specs, on the wrist. (but maybe not in all positions) $200 watch. $100 crystal, maybe $50 labor. Last edited by sleddog; 15 June 2012 at 10:05 AM.. |
|
30 August 2012, 01:01 AM | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 208
|
Quote:
|
|
2 November 2013, 08:59 AM | #24 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Michael
Location: The Washingtons
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 75
|
Quote:
New blue noir gmt and a vintage birth year Sub with nice patina would be my choices. |
|
2 November 2013, 10:36 AM | #25 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: California, USA
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
|
|
2 November 2013, 10:47 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Monterey Co. Ca.
Watch: 16610, 16613, 024
Posts: 439
|
Can dress it up or down with a Rubber B.... Read it wrong and thought OP was talking about what is in your collection now.... I'll still stay with these two that have been with me for some time...
Panerai for endless strap changes....
__________________
|
14 June 2012, 11:51 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Indra
Location: Jakarta
Watch: ROLEXes, OMEGAs
Posts: 154
|
sub an TT DJ
|
15 June 2012, 01:37 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,884
|
|
14 June 2012, 11:54 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: PP 5320G
Posts: 1,259
|
DDII and DJII
|
14 June 2012, 11:56 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
|
My chosen 2 would be similar what you have. I would definitely have a sub and the second would either be a Datejust or Day-Date.
Could you try telling your wife you have to get your watches serviced 2 at a time? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.