ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 December 2012, 09:13 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1
|
Flooded Submariner
I purchased my Submariner over 20 years ago, and have never had a problem with it. I am a Master SCUBA Diver and have worn this watch on over 600 recreational dives. Late last year, I noticed it has started to run slowly and decided to have the watch serviced for the first time. It had never been opened for over 20 years. I carried the watch to Barton-Clay Fine Jewelers, 2701 Cahaba Road, Mountain Brook, AL 35223, to be serviced by their certified Rolex watch repairman, Bobby, in January, 2012. He informed me that he had serviced the watch and replaced some parts, including the crystal, and I paid over $750 for this first-ever service. I was told I had a two-year warranty.
Last month, I went SCUBA diving for the first time since the watch had been serviced. On my very first dive, the watch flooded at a maximum depth of 60 feet. The crown was tight, as I checked it prior to the dive as I do all of my other equipment. On returning from the trip, I returned the watch to Bobby and he did a leak test and told me he couldn’t find a leak. After a week, he called me and told me he had dried out the watch and it would cost me over $1000 in parts to repair the watch, but I would not be charged labor. He also told me that he would not warranty this DIVE WATCH against leaking the next time I went diving. I told him that I needed a guarantee that the watch was waterproof, since it was a DIVE WATCH. He confessed that if it leaked again, I would be required to do the same thing and pay the same money to have it fixed. I called Rolex Customer Service in NY and TX, and they both told me to ship the watch to the Service Center to be restored to factory standards, and that the store that serviced the watch should pay for shipping and repair of the watch, including parts and labor. I have shipped it back to the Rolex Service Center in TX and am waiting on the estimate. The store refused to pay for parts and only their labor was no charge. Has anyone ever had this happen? What did Rolex do? |
29 December 2012, 09:26 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
Welcome, I don't have any experience with this but did bobby say if he pressure tested it after servicing?
__________________
|
29 December 2012, 09:27 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Here and there
Watch: Panerai, Rolex
Posts: 289
|
I would send it to Rik at Time Care Inc. He's very good and well respected on the forum.
|
29 December 2012, 09:34 AM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
Contact Better Business Bureau and small claims court maybe needed. Good luck and I wish it's resolved amicably.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
29 December 2012, 09:37 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
Quote:
Also recommend Riki from Time Care. I recently got a Sub back from Service, and included is a pressure test slip (I dont know how to read it, but its there).
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
|
29 December 2012, 10:20 PM | #6 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Quote:
Quote:
Should he have the RSC in Dallas stop working on his watch and send it to Rik? |
||
29 December 2012, 10:25 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Air-King 5500
Posts: 2,620
|
Well, it really looks like your watchmaker screwed you pretty badly. you should obviously be able to use your sub for its intended purpose and not worry about it.
|
29 December 2012, 10:32 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,507
|
|
29 December 2012, 09:32 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
nope , sounds like a rolex job ,,, i can see the row already .. but it will all depend on wether or not it was tested for water resistance , or not ,,, if your lucky they will have the test listed on their bill.
welcome to the forumss , not a good start but hello anyways. |
29 December 2012, 09:35 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
|
Yikes. I think unlikely they will pay for anything.
They just lost a customer, but I doubt they care that much. That's too bad. But I suggest you just pay rolex and suck it up. Sucky advice, but I don't think you have a lot of options
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
29 December 2012, 09:55 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 570
|
What you just described is incompetence at its very worst. The RSC in New York has always been excellent. Bobby should be taken to a depth of 60 feet so he can learn something and that AD should be shut down.
|
29 December 2012, 09:55 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,087
|
Welcome to TRF Hope things get better from here.
|
29 December 2012, 09:55 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Wayne
Location: California
Watch: Rolex, PAM
Posts: 3,302
|
Sorry to hear. Hopefully Rolex will make it right. Not related to the damage, but did you pressure test it in the years prior to the service?
|
29 December 2012, 09:56 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,526
|
Welcome to the Forum MD.
I think that you will get some satisfaction from Rolex. If Bobby is a certified Rolex technician and you have the two year warranty then Rolex would have to stand behind him and make this good IMO.
__________________
E |
29 December 2012, 09:56 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
Welcome to the Forum!
Very sorry to hear this. I doubt the repair shop will pay the RSC for what should have been done in the first place. The BBB sounds like a great start. I hope for the best for you in getting this resolved. |
29 December 2012, 10:13 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Doesn't sound like Bobby properly checked for water resistance ergo they should pay for RSC to fix it under their warranty policy.
|
29 December 2012, 12:13 PM | #17 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: J
Location: The great Midwest
Watch: youlookinat?
Posts: 2,369
|
Quote:
Quote:
I wouldn't give them the additional 1K for his mistake.....it was covered under warranty and it failed. Simple. I would tell Rolex of "Bobby's" error and have them sort it. |
||
29 December 2012, 10:15 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Heath
Location: Lawrenceburg KY
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 3,982
|
Welcome to the forum. Hate to hear this has happened to you. Most likely you will end up eating the service at RSC but your watch will be back to brand new specs and you will be able to use it again as it was intended.
__________________
“You may delay, but time will not.” ― Benjamin Franklin |
29 December 2012, 10:32 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Seiko SBDX001
Posts: 256
|
I have to say that the AD's response is unacceptable, and that they should be made to honor their warranty. However I'd also add that you can avoid this kind of headache in the future by buying a cheap Casio, Citizen or Seiko to dive in (this is what I do). Leave your expensive Rolex at home. Why subject it to risk?
__________________
Living on a ledge, just past the edge... |
29 December 2012, 11:04 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Posts: 3,271
|
Quote:
The man bought a DIVE watch to use and if it was properly serviced, there is no risk to it flooding at any depth it may be used at. The headache is all the technicians fault for shoddy work, not the OP's for using his watch for what it was built for. I have expensive dive watches (Doxa, Rolex, Omega, AP etc) to name a few and though I don't dive often, I know they will perform as intended and I like to dive with them, as I would guess the OP does as well. I would have the RSC fix my watch then go after the AD to reimburse me, willingly or forced to with a judgment by court. BBB is all fine and good but meaningless to many nor do they have any teeth to force a business to do anything. Good luck!
__________________
DOXA-AFICIONADO "It has been my experience that folks who have no vices have very few virtues. " Abraham Lincoln 1809-1865 |
|
29 December 2012, 01:52 PM | #21 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Seiko SBDX001
Posts: 256
|
Quote:
Quote:
But you didn't. As for your assertions that the watch should hold up for its intended use, remember - it's no longer legal to mark these watches "waterproof", because everyone (except you guys, apparently) recognizes that there is no such thing as "waterproof". The watches are "water resistant", and courts of law have held that manufactures must mark them as such because there is a chance that their water resistance will fail.
__________________
Living on a ledge, just past the edge... |
||
29 December 2012, 10:32 AM | #22 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
I'd find out what RSC has to say about the issue, including what to do about "Bobby."
He's a representative of Rolex and benefits from that association. If he's out there screwing up Rolex watches and the Rolex reputation, I would think that Rolex would not be particularly happy about that. It would seem to me that Bobby has a lot more at stake than just a single unsatisfied customer. If the RSC can't get Bobby to do the right thing, then the BBB and small claims court would be my next move. I try to be philosophical about a lot of disappointments in life, but this is an issue that I would probably seek a pound of flesh.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
29 December 2012, 10:34 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Matte
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,006
|
at this point i would start going on a fact-checking mission.
1. get in writing what EXACTLY is done during any level of service. as in what they do for what kind of watch when it goes in for service, and if there are different service levels. 2. get in writing what EXACTLY your watch would have had done to it. eg: complete overhaul, lubrication, regulation, pressure testing, replaced parts etc. 3. get a complete service report and receipt of this service. photocopies, anything. it stands to reason the watchmaker keeps detailed records of what watches he services, what tasks he performs, and what parts are replaced. and most importantly, 4. study the warranty agreement (if they didn't give you a copy, you should get one poste haste.) find out what EXACTLY is covered under warranty and what isn't. that you have to fork over another grand for damage to a watch due to their incompetence is reprehensible at best. not would i boycott that particular shop and their watchmaker, i would pay for a half page spread in a newspaper or magazine describing the experience. i'm furious for you right now. good luck working things out! Cofion Cynnes, Matte |
29 December 2012, 10:37 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: David
Location: Gardnerville, NV
Watch: 16710
Posts: 2,706
|
Not to add insult to injury and slag the South, as I love it there; but your first clue that this wasn't going to end well was when the Rolex tech was named "Bobby."
|
29 December 2012, 03:25 PM | #25 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
Quote:
I'm not clear on this.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
30 December 2012, 02:37 PM | #26 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
|
Pretty crude, actually, very crude post.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
31 December 2012, 04:05 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ri
Watch: Sun Dial
Posts: 14,346
|
Of course we don't know what bobby did. But I have to say our local ad had / has an in-house guy and they serviced rolex until they lost their ad status a few years ago. They change over bezel inserts for me and took off a cyclops but that's about how far I thought I should go with them even though their family has been in the business for years. But for my full service after about 7 or 8 years, i felt only rolex would do. This was also after they lost ad status. I went to mall store that is an ad. Didn't buy the watch there but chat with a sales guy from time to time. He set up the service and took care of shipping to RSc in NYC. I don't remember exactly but I think they did that free of charge. Rolex communicated with me as to what they recommended and then when it was ready they sent it back to the ad for me to pick up. Thought it was a good experience.
|
31 December 2012, 01:27 AM | #28 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: CT
Posts: 134
|
|
31 December 2012, 01:52 AM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NYC
Posts: 570
|
|
31 December 2012, 07:47 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
I don't think this adds much to the conversation.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.