ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
1 January 2013, 07:39 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United States
Watch: Overseas
Posts: 992
|
Explorer vs. Explorer 2 vs. Sub
I just struck a deal and should have the funds for my first Rolex within a few hours . So my options are:
Explorer 14270 or 114270: Pros- Classic Good size for my 6.5 inch wrist Black dial to go with my white dial JLC Understated Easy to find under 4k Pros- Explorer 2 16570 Polar: Stunning GMT is useful and its nice to have a complication Understated Moderately easy to find under 4k Cons- Cyclops No Date Sub: Pros- Classic Beautiful THE Rolex Cons- Flashy Common Hard to find under 4k Right now I'm leaning towards an Explorer, either one. Which would you guys pick with a strict 4k USD budget? Thanks and Happy New Year!!! |
1 January 2013, 08:03 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
tough choice , i think the eplorer1 is a classic that will live beside anything you get in the future , where as a exp2 or a sub would be a flipper ... so ,, as a watch to keep , has to be an explorer 1 ,,, the older 36mm one would be a great wrist size too.
|
1 January 2013, 08:39 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Lowlands
Watch: White 'n Black
Posts: 641
|
All three are great, my considerations:
The 114270 has new features like the bracelet and is a great classic piece. The sub is indeed more common, but that's 'cause it's an iconic piece! The bezel is a usefull feature for timing. I love it! But the exp 2 would be my choice as a one rolex option. It's very, very comfy, tough, under the radar and versitile, dressed up and down! My to go watch. Good luck and keep us informed! |
1 January 2013, 08:52 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Mohammed
Location: Kuwait
Watch: @kuwaitinglist
Posts: 1,622
|
All three are great IMHO. I would go with the Explorer 36mm.
|
1 January 2013, 08:56 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Explorer 36mm. Really the best of the bunch in my opinion
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
1 January 2013, 11:07 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 586
|
Explorer I
|
1 January 2013, 11:19 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Bill
Location: Kennesaw,Ga.
Watch: GMT II;SS DJ
Posts: 16
|
Well, 2 weeks ago I had all 3.
I've since sold ( to friends) the ExII and the Sub ND. Really like them both, but, to be honest, wasn't giving them much wear time. In my case, the EXII can't do anything my GMT doesn't; the GMT is my first Rolex bought 15 years ago, so it's staying. I have the EXI (36mm) on my wrist now. |
2 January 2013, 12:02 AM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
Non date sub flashy ? Best of the bunch.
|
2 January 2013, 12:15 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Like them all, you can't go wrong.
|
2 January 2013, 12:39 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chuck
Location: SW Florida
Watch: 16233,16610,214270
Posts: 11,196
|
No date sub would be my choice. A classic watch.
__________________
16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer 114300 Oyster Perpetual 76200 Tudor Date+Day |
2 January 2013, 12:48 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,599
|
as the others have said ... tough choice
i have all 3 and wouldn't like to give any of them up....although i did officially give the explorer I to my father, it was perfect for him! that said, i would recommend the 14270, very understated and unique with the 3 6 9 dial. it has a great fit and fits all situations, i prefer it over its newer replacement. and most importantly, it has no "cons" essentially your trying to choose between 3 keepers, can't lose
__________________
|
2 January 2013, 01:02 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 237
|
Tough choices, but I would go with the no date sub.
I feel that the Exp & Exp II have been trumped by the newer releases (the Exp I less so than the II), but in many regards the case and lugs on the legacy Sub are preferred over the new style by many. |
2 January 2013, 01:10 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Steve
Location: NJ
Watch: Rolex 16610
Posts: 2,160
|
I'd go Exp II for the date function. For a daily wearer I really use that function
|
2 January 2013, 01:58 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Al
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,153
|
My first choice would be 114270, but you will not find one for 4K. Second choice would be sub but you will not find a decent one for 4k. Don't care for 14270. Third choice would be a datejust. Could get a nice datejust for 4k and it is good size for your 6.5 wrist.
|
2 January 2013, 02:23 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United States
Watch: Overseas
Posts: 992
|
Here's where I stand now: The sub is pretty much out. I am slightly favoring the Explorer 2, but am still interested in the Explorer 1. Thanks for all the great replies.
|
2 January 2013, 02:40 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I'd get the Explorer II.
|
2 January 2013, 02:42 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Alloa, Scotland
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 219
|
I'd go with the explorer 2, I have one and love it it was my first Rolex as well.
|
2 January 2013, 02:45 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
2 January 2013, 02:58 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Kenn
Location: Dallas
Watch: DD II
Posts: 32
|
Explorer II best all around versatile watch
|
2 January 2013, 03:21 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mass/Vegas/disney
Watch: Hulk,114060,14060
Posts: 929
|
You won't find a 114270 for 4k but you can find the 14270 so I would go that route if sticking to a 4k budget.
|
2 January 2013, 03:28 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Makatiyi
Location: California
Watch: Rolex, Omega
Posts: 220
|
ND sub for me!
|
2 January 2013, 06:04 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Greg Visser
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 587
|
Difficult decision since all 3 are great watches in their own rights. I'd go Exp II for versatility.
Greg |
2 January 2013, 06:12 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Sac Valley, CA US
Watch: Patek 5980/1A
Posts: 2,860
|
EXPII.
I owned one, traded it for "The One," then bought another EXPII because I really missed it. Now I'm on to other pastures, so the EXPII I couldn't live without will be up for sale soon (sorry to say it will not fit your budget!) |
2 January 2013, 07:09 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 58
|
I've had all three, and kept only the Explorers (14270, 16570 black and polar). Although the Sub brought me to this great hobby, I just found it didn't speak to me nearly as much as any of my Explorers. I later picked up a PO which is filled my diver "needs" and thus far, I haven't had any regrets over selling the 14060M. Now, if a Sea-Dweller were to make its way into my hands, I can't say I'd shoo it away....
__________________
Explorer, Explorer II Polar, Explorer II Noir, Speedmaster Pro .321, Speedmaster Pro 3594.50 Seamaster 600 Date, Aqua Terra 2503.33, Planet Ocean 42mm, Sinn 856 UTC, Damasko DA44 Black, Seiko SBDX001 Marinemaster, Seiko Alpinist, Smiths Prs-28a, Hamilton Khaki |
2 January 2013, 07:28 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: TC
Location: GMT -8
Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea
Posts: 582
|
Explorer II
__________________
Tudor Submariner 76100/Rolex TT Submariner Blue X/Victorinox AirBoss Mach 6/Longines Grande Vitesse/Rolex SeaDweller DeepSea V/ GShock GW-3000B/ Tudor Prince Date 74034/ Rolex ExII 42 WD/ Rolex Submariner 116610 LV/ Tudor Pelagos Blue |
2 January 2013, 07:57 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
|
I vote polar white explorerII! Very comfy and looks awesome!
__________________
Patek Philippe Rolex |
2 January 2013, 08:38 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
If 114270 fits your wrist, by all means I think that is the way to go. Cognoscenti's rollie.
|
2 January 2013, 08:41 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 3,392
|
I vote for the ExpII.
|
2 January 2013, 08:46 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 205
|
I've really wanted to like the ExpI but I'm continually disappointed every time I try. I'd go ND sub if its your first Rolex, that's the most classic/no regrets. The ExpII is nice, but it isn't a sub.
Best of luck though, and congrats on the impending purchase! |
3 January 2013, 07:08 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United States
Watch: Overseas
Posts: 992
|
I am sad to report that the buyer dropped out of my sale, its back to waiting for a deal. But, soon enough, I will have a Rolex on my wrist.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.