The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 March 2013, 02:54 AM   #1
2th Dr
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
Anti-reflective coating... Like it or not and why?

Always wondered what others thought about it. Make any difference to you or how a watch would look with or without it?
2th Dr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 03:30 AM   #2
salem65
"TRF" Member
 
salem65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: JS Watch co. 101
Posts: 1,395
I can't tell the difference between one that has single or double coating or no coating at all. Just like all the anti-glare on eye glasses, I still cannot tell the difference. So, it doesn't matter to me if there is anti-reflective on the crystal or not.
__________________
JS Watch 101 ▪ Grand Seiko SBGX061 ▪ Breitling A17364
salem65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 03:54 AM   #3
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
It makes a huge difference soi like it but I don't like when it gets scratched so I'd only want the under glass coating.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 04:02 AM   #4
Johny
"TRF" Member
 
Johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
i had an a/r cyclops crystal fitted to my lv recently. it looks great and the date is a lot easier to read.
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM.
Johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 05:32 AM   #5
Jocke
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Jocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johny View Post
i had an a/r cyclops crystal fitted to my lv recently. it looks great and the date is a lot easier to read.
Any pics?

Paul need one too, the he can see his date.
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish.

What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom?

Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional
photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute.
Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 10:44 PM   #6
Johny
"TRF" Member
 
Johny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: john
Location: Scotland
Watch: sub 16610Lv
Posts: 13,523
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jocke View Post
Any pics?

Paul need one too, the he can see his date.
will post some later jocke....right now i am at my flute lesson. :thumbsu p:
__________________
"AFTER DARK" BAR AND NIGHT CLUB GM.
Johny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2013, 12:48 PM   #7
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
It makes a huge difference soi like it but I don't like when it gets scratched so I'd only want the under glass coating.

This
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 04:12 AM   #8
77T
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
77T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,034
Since I have mostly vintage pieces currently I don't have an AR crystals - on the sapphire models I understand its value though.
__________________


Does anyone really know what time it is?
77T is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 04:25 AM   #9
2th Dr
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
I'm also curious why Rolex doesn't use it. I think it makes ANY dial really pop! But once it's damaged, at least for me, it becomes a focal point.
2th Dr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 05:45 AM   #10
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2th DR View Post
I'm also curious why Rolex doesn't use it. I think it makes ANY dial really pop! But once it's damaged, at least for me, it becomes a focal point.

As far as AR under the cyclops, I only wish they had thought of it sooner.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 05:03 AM   #11
withthesword
"TRF" Member
 
withthesword's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Matte
Location: Toronto
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,006
AR coating on the underside of Rolex's sapphire has always been one of the things i wish they would do.
__________________
Ready. Ready. Hack.

My Flickr Photostream

Wishlist: 1984 gmt
withthesword is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 05:37 AM   #12
Bangel
"TRF" Member
 
Bangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 15,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by withthesword View Post
AR coating on the underside of Rolex's sapphire has always been one of the things i wish they would do.
Me too.
Bangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 05:22 AM   #13
dddrees
"TRF" Member
 
dddrees's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
Not that big of fan.

I like the glisten of the Rolex crystal, and I've heard about a few watches that had it and it started to peel or scratch.

My understanding is that it generally does better underneath the crystal than on top of.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion.

Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation.

Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of
Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
dddrees is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 05:45 AM   #14
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2th DR View Post
I'm also curious why Rolex doesn't use it. I think it makes ANY dial really pop! But once it's damaged, at least for me, it becomes a focal point.
I agree. My PO's dial looks like it's in hd. I think the real reason Rolex doesn't use it is just for bling since the crystal shines and reflects light so much. I do like the shiney look of my Rolex but I'm also captivated when looking at my PO's crystal clear dial.
An even compromise for Rolex would be to just apply it to the underside.

My vote is that I like it more.

Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 06:28 AM   #15
Art 1
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2th DR View Post
Always wondered what others thought about it. Make any difference to you or how a watch would look with or without it?
Mark, I like it on my Breitlings but don't think it would look so good on a Rolex. If you know what I mean.
Art 1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 07:22 AM   #16
2th Dr
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Mark-O!
Location: Arlington, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 12,714
I personally like it but somehow some of it rubbed off my new Perrelet that I wear at work and it is definitely noticable. Now I'm thinking of removing the rest of it.
2th Dr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 March 2013, 10:59 PM   #17
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
My Omega PO has double AR. To me, it significant enhance readability even at odd angles.


benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2013, 03:34 AM   #18
tinger
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: weehawken
Posts: 847
Seiko's new proprietary 'super-clear coating' is awesome. You dont see/notice the glass at most angles. Super clear and no color/blue tint.
tinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 March 2013, 12:05 PM   #19
watchf
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
Its great on the cyclops. It does make a slight difference on the crystal when I had a 2500 PO but its not a deal breaker or anything significant to me at all. In fact having the coating on the outer glass itself is a big negative due to potential scratches wearing off the coating making the crystal look awful.
watchf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.