ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
11 January 2008, 01:42 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 520
|
Pre Daytona?
In the early 80's I've got what, if I remember wright, was a 1971 Daytona, manual winding, white dial with the tach scale on the SS bezel. I've got it used from an AD, and I remember there was no word DAYTONA printed on the dial. Never saw another one like that after selling it in 1986.
Any idea if it wasn´t called Daytona yet in 1971? BTW, wish I had it now!!!! |
11 January 2008, 01:56 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ron
Location: oakland calif
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 23
|
I hope I can add a little light to the subject. Originally these were not called Daytonas. They were called Cosmographs. The earlier ones with the round (no screw down pushers) were signed Rolex Cosmograph while the later ones with the screw down pushers were signed Rolex Oyster Cosmograph. Daytona was added to some of the dials, but not all of them. You can find both screw down and non screw down both with Daytona (in several different colors) and some do not have Daytona at all.
|
11 January 2008, 02:15 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canary Islands
Posts: 520
|
Thanks for a quick and clear answer!
|
11 January 2008, 02:20 AM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,516
|
Exactly right..
Rolex has made Chronographs since the 1920's. They came out with the Cosmograph in 1961 and followed with the Daytona badged Cosmograph in 1962. Kind of like the DD being called the President, the Cosmograph became commonly known as the Daytona and now they are all badged that way.. Sales of Daytonas (any chronograph) by Rolex up until the early 80's was slow. That is the only model you could get 20% off of because they just didn't sell back then.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
11 January 2008, 02:28 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
Isn't the irony just sickening?
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
11 January 2008, 02:16 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
The naming's a bit muddled, actually. The original model 6239 was launched in 1960 with the name Cosmograph, although Rolex had previously produced another model also called the Cosmograph, which displayed moon phases instead. Shortly after the 6239's launch the name Daytona was added, but there was no consistency in the labelling, some watches had Cosmograph on the dial, some had Daytona and some had both.
Just to add to the confusion, "pre-Daytona" is often used to refer to the chronographs that Rolex made before the 6239.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
11 January 2008, 02:06 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
Mine was early 70's and didn't have Daytona on it either. Here's a quick pic of the original dial it came with.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.