ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
4 July 2013, 01:03 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ny
Watch: sub-c Date
Posts: 1,322
|
wearing a submariner
for those that have a sub did it take time getting use to the heavyness ?
and due to the thick case did it stand up on the wrist? |
4 July 2013, 01:09 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Would call any of the sub range heavy watches and cases are not all that thick for a sports watch.The 16610 weight around 135grams, 14060M around 127grams. The newer ceramic 116610, 114060M models are a little heavier around 152 grams,even the DSSD although it is a thicker watch, is around 215 grams which is still not all that heavy.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
4 July 2013, 01:10 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,258
|
I went from a DOXA which was heavier and quite a bit higher on the wrist so it was the opposite for me. All comes down to what you are comparing it to I guess.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
4 July 2013, 01:20 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
|
I went from an IWC AT to a 16610, not heavy at all IMO.
__________________
|
4 July 2013, 01:23 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Marty
Location: Florida
Watch: Pam 1313
Posts: 456
|
I went from a Pam 001D to a 14060m to a dssd, which is heavy compared to the 14060m.
|
4 July 2013, 01:32 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Dan
Location: UK
Watch: 116528
Posts: 1,049
|
The SS SubC? No, not at all it felt extremely comfortable and the thick caseback just lifts it off your wrist a few mm. The YG Daytona however, that's another story. It takes a bit of getting used to but in a really good way!
The weight of the SS Sub is perfect and I like the fact that the YG is heavy, in fact, I love it, but it's heavy for a reason and if I had an SS watch this heavy, I don't think I would feel the same about it. |
4 July 2013, 01:36 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
|
A Sub is not heavy . . . a DSSD . . . is another thing
HAGOne |
4 July 2013, 10:54 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,793
|
That is so true. I tried that as my first Rolex and exchanged it a couple of days later for a Sub.
You certainly do get used to the weight of the sub and I don't feel right without in on my wrist now...and no, when it is properly fitted the watch stays centered on top of your wrist with no problems! The perfect sports watch IMHO!
__________________
16610 ♛ 16610LV ♛ 214270 MK2 "Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!" |
4 July 2013, 01:49 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
My Subs fit well when I first tried them on. I find the Explorer 1 and II's to be lighter.
|
4 July 2013, 02:33 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Watch: Smurf/Hulk/1680
Posts: 2,920
|
Haven't really noticed the wieght of mine at all, so I guess the answer for me is no. Fits well under shirts, both single and double cuffed, so no problem with height from the wrist for me.
|
4 July 2013, 02:36 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 1,373
|
Try on a gold Royal Oak Offshore and then come back and ask if it's heavy!
|
4 July 2013, 02:46 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,297
|
It ain't heavy, it's my submariner.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
18 September 2013, 03:06 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
Love "The Hollies" reference.
__________________
|
4 July 2013, 03:10 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: David
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: SubC Date
Posts: 242
|
I went from a Milgauss to a Sub C so for me it was even lighter and sits closer to the wrist! No complaints here. Sub weight is just right to me.
|
4 July 2013, 03:12 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ny
Watch: sub-c Date
Posts: 1,322
|
Im going from a strap dj to sub
|
4 July 2013, 03:29 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Slovenia, EU
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 1,507
|
Added GMT to my collection, wore SubC before, still getting used to how it sits lower, I liked it raised a bit.
|
4 July 2013, 03:31 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: sam
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: Me Tint
Posts: 3,777
|
You will get used to it pretty quick. I having been wearing a SD, a little Heavier than a Sub, and hardly notice it now.
|
4 July 2013, 03:34 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Not at all. My 18kt Sub on the other hand yes somewhat.
|
4 July 2013, 03:38 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Lynn
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 452
|
The only watch I have ever worn where I noticed its weight was an Omega Seamaster chronograph. I have a SubC no-date, SubC Blue TT and, a DSSD. I put them on in the morning and never notice I'm wearing a watch until I look at it.
|
4 July 2013, 04:33 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Midwest
Posts: 746
|
Unless it is a one pound watch then the weight of the watch will not bother me wearing it. ;)
|
4 July 2013, 04:53 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
From reading the responses it is obvious the perceived heft is relative to what you have been used to wearing. But I would be surprised if the SS Sub is much heavier (if at all) than the WG DJ you are currently wearing.
But to answer your question, yes, you will get used to it. Moreover, you will come to love the feeling of having a watch of real substance on your wrist. While it sits taller than the DJ, it has little problem nesting under the cuff of a dress shirt.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
4 July 2013, 04:59 AM | #22 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
Very comfortable and easy to wear. Go try one on before you buy and decide for yourself! Cheers,
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
4 July 2013, 04:59 AM | #23 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Richmond, VA
Watch: 116610 - Sub Date
Posts: 63
|
I came from a smaller Tag, and yes, it took about 2 weeks for the Sub to "feel right" - but now I love it. It also took some time to adjust to my shirt cuffs - I had many of my cuffs made larger to fit better.
Stick with it - shouldn't be too long/ |
4 July 2013, 05:35 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Marbella
Watch: Exp 216570 Polar
Posts: 357
|
Funny, for me it was the exact opposite! I walked away from a Sub-C brand new for 6000 bucks back in 2011 from Gibraltar because it felt too light and tiny for my taste.
Ended up buying a Glashutte Sports Evo Pano Date. Now that is HEAVY, German tank and built like one too, weighing in at 220grs! Best watch Ive ever owned too, but I like to really feel my watches! |
4 July 2013, 05:39 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Submariner, heavy? Sorry but I find this a little ridiculous.
I remember the first time I grabbed a Submariner, I thought it was fake or inferior in quality. Now the SubC has increased in weight marginally compared to the pre-ceramics, but to use the word heavy.....negatron. |
4 July 2013, 11:22 AM | #26 | |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 31
|
Quote:
|
|
4 July 2013, 11:26 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: ny
Watch: sub-c Date
Posts: 1,322
|
Maybe it hasn't been sized correctly. If I take off another lin it will be too tight
One side seems to have more links than the other could that be the issue ? |
5 July 2013, 05:54 AM | #28 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Quote:
I wear mine very snug, above the wrist bone, with just enough slack to slide down over it towards my hand, then I shake it back up. Not even enough room to fit a pinky but that's me, it's comfortable like that, to me. |
|
4 July 2013, 05:51 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
I bought my subs after a DSSD, so they feel light to me....................
|
4 July 2013, 05:57 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Scotland
Posts: 383
|
I don't find a Sub too heavy and I don't think it sits too high either. Just try it – I'm sure you'll be delighted with it!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.