ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jumproductions · 24 August 2013, 10:41 AM

I am thinking to trade in my Yellow Gold Audemars Offshore Royal Oak Chronograph for a Rose Gold Offshore Rubberclad. Seems like the MSRP is close on these two models. What do you think is fair for the trade? I am located in Miami, Fl.

AUDEMARS ROYAL OAK CHRONOGRAPH YELLOW GOLD

TRADE

AUDEMARS ROSE GOLD OFFSHORE RUBBERCLAD

texex91 · 24 August 2013, 11:30 AM

Can't speak about trade pricing, but RG RC any day...or might we talk you into a 44mm RG!

tavv160 · 24 August 2013, 06:40 PM

I would keep the ROC. In my opinion it is the more classic watch that will be a classic forever. Wouldn't look old in 20 years, and it is difficult to predict what the ROO would do.

jumproductions · 24 August 2013, 08:32 PM

Royal Oak :
I agree the royal oak is more of a timeless look but I don't keep my watches too long and eventually I may get and all gold 41mm royal oak if I miss it.

Offshore:
I love the 44mm but the lowest price I have seen has been $39k for ceramic which is unfortunately out of my budget. I would be happy to pay $10k to upgrade to the ceramic but don't think that is doable. The rubberclad I have found for $27k complete which is not a huge difference from my watch.

Hkexpat183 · 24 August 2013, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jumproductions

Royal Oak :
I agree the royal oak is more of a timeless look but I don't keep my watches too long and eventually I may get and all gold 41mm royal oak if I miss it.

Offshore:
I love the 44mm but the lowest price I have seen has been $39k for ceramic which is unfortunately out of my budget. I would be happy to pay $10k to upgrade to the ceramic but don't think that is doable. The rubberclad I have found for $27k complete which is not a huge difference from my watch.

I recently picked up a brand new 44mm RG Novelty for ~US$36k from a boutique...so you can definitely find it cheaper than US$39K...just have to find it at the right AD/Boutique that is willing to deal...

Dream99 · 25 August 2013, 09:43 AM

Is it just me or does the screw at the 4 position look wrong?

24 August 2013, 10:41 AM	#1
jumproductions "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: USA Watch: Audemars Offshore Posts: 141	Ap yellow gold royal oak for offshore I am thinking to trade in my Yellow Gold Audemars Offshore Royal Oak Chronograph for a Rose Gold Offshore Rubberclad. Seems like the MSRP is close on these two models. What do you think is fair for the trade? I am located in Miami, Fl. AUDEMARS ROYAL OAK CHRONOGRAPH YELLOW GOLD TRADE AUDEMARS ROSE GOLD OFFSHORE RUBBERCLAD

24 August 2013, 08:32 PM	#4
jumproductions "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: USA Watch: Audemars Offshore Posts: 141	Ap Ro vs Offshore Royal Oak : I agree the royal oak is more of a timeless look but I don't keep my watches too long and eventually I may get and all gold 41mm royal oak if I miss it. Offshore: I love the 44mm but the lowest price I have seen has been $39k for ceramic which is unfortunately out of my budget. I would be happy to pay $10k to upgrade to the ceramic but don't think that is doable. The rubberclad I have found for $27k complete which is not a huge difference from my watch.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

24 August 2013, 11:30 AM	#2
texex91 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: . Posts: 17,898	Can't speak about trade pricing, but RG RC any day...or might we talk you into a 44mm RG!

24 August 2013, 06:40 PM	#3
tavv160 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Real Name: Tony Location: UK Watch: AP, Rolex, JLC... Posts: 631	I would keep the ROC. In my opinion it is the more classic watch that will be a classic forever. Wouldn't look old in 20 years, and it is difficult to predict what the ROO would do.

25 August 2013, 09:43 AM	#6
Dream99 Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Alan Location: Bristol. UK Posts: 621	Is it just me or does the screw at the 4 position look wrong?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)