New Sea Dweller or New GMT Pepsi ?

[Peter Hightower]

I have been surfing this site and and a little torn between the two. The problem is the misses says the SD looks like my Seiko (black monster), and the GMT Pepsi looks funny. Not that her opinion matters that much, but what is msrp on each and what are your thoughts ?

[Texsubmariner]

MSRP SD: $5375, GMT II Pepsi: $5075. You should be able to get discounts on both. If you don't like the Pepsi, you can switch out the bezel to coke or all black, and these can be bought through AD or eBay.

The 2 wear differently, and I suggest you try on both at an AD.

[JBat]

I would ask, what do you think? It's okay if your wife doesn't care for a particular watch, but you're the one who has to wear it. Both are excellent. Which one sings to you?

[Gurmot]

Hi Peter,

I have a SD and a GMT black/red and given the choice I would keep the SD every time. The GMTs have a good following and presence but you just can't beat the SD. It is the top of the tree in evolutionary terms as far as I am concerned.

Keep the Seiko Monster for those times when you are afraid of doing some real damage and wear the SD the rest of the time. Just my opinion.

Good luck.

[Dan Pierce]

Tough call Peter. Good luck with that.
dP

[SPACE-DWELLER]

Which of the two Rolex watches appeals most to YOU, Peter??

I suggest you go for the Rolex that you like best.

But you cannot really go wrong since both watches are awesome.

[DS/B MINI S]

Originally Posted by Peter Hightower

I have been surfing this site and and a little torn between the two. The problem is the misses says the SD looks like my Seiko (black monster), and the GMT Pepsi looks funny. Not that her opinion matters that much, but what is msrp on each and what are your thoughts ?

I had a Black Monster for a few years. Great watch for a couple hundred bucks, but with all due respect to your wife...it doesn't look anything like the Sea-Dweller.
Since there are only a few hundred dollars difference in price of the SD and GMT Pepsi, don't let cost determine which you purchase. They are very different watches, so you will need to try them on to see which you prefer. If you don't need the multiple time zone functions of the GMT your choice should be easy

[Trainer]

It really doesn't matter. In the end you'll probably end up owning both.

Tempus Fugit,
Trainer

[JBat]

Originally Posted by Trainer

It really doesn't matter. In the end you'll probably end up owning both.

Tempus Fugit,
Trainer

[etp095]

Originally Posted by Trainer

It really doesn't matter. In the end you'll probably end up owning both.

Tempus Fugit,
Trainer

i second the motion,you'll end up buying both.i'd get the gmt II first,since it's being discontinued.

[904L_addict]

SD all the way. I don't think I've ever come across anyone saying anything negative about the SD besides it's too tall or heavy (which it's neither). This includes other brand forums.
Sure miss mine.

[TheChimp]

My wife sees two types of watch ....Gold and not gold..... She's not all that helpful when watch shopping.

[ttannert]

You can't go wrong with either. Both scream classic Rolex. Try both on because they feel different on your wrist. Go luck and post pics when you bring one home.

[Robb]

Thats a very hard decision!!

[portable75]

I like the GMT!

[haakon59]

They are both nice but have different strengths. The SD would be great if you need to be in water often while the GMT is a great travel watch. Which functions do you need more often? That will tell you the right decision.

[mike]

Boy Peter, as other have said it's a tough call. Both references are possessed of great histories and were designed to meet the needs of a specific group. The GMT wears a bit lighter and has a multi time zone capability, but the SD is such an iconic professionals watch.

Try both and ask which would suit your needs the best----then get both. LOL!

[feudallordcult]

definitely the SD!, no doubt abt it.

[Baptistman]

Originally Posted by mike

Boy Peter, as other have said it's a tough call. Both references are possessed of great histories and were designed to meet the needs of a specific group. The GMT wears a bit lighter and has a multi time zone capability, but the SD is such an iconic professionals watch.

Try both and ask which would suit your needs the best----then get both. LOL!

These photos say it all. That version of the GMT is great I'm really sad they have discontinued it. But The SD is just stonking.

[Letsgodiving]

I don't really see much of a comparison to a Seiko Monster but if you are used to wearing a Monster you might be disappointed with the size and presence of the GMT when compared to an SD or the Seiko. Just my .02.

[steel4me]

I have both .. the SD I bought in Dec 07 and gmt master II pepsi in Jan of 08 ... when I pick up the SD, it is clearly the most massive .. feels heavier and looks like a freakin tool watch ... gmt master II by comparison feels much lighter ...almost weightless.... yikes!!!

[Trurolexer]

Buy SD first and sell your Seiko Black Monster, so you have only one diver's watch. After that buy GMT Master II 16710!!! Problem solved!!!

[CPCC]

recently, I couldnt decide but finally went with the GMT Pepsi and I cant be happier.
Nice good fit, not too bulky. I have not second guessed my decision.

[sheldonsmith]

I lean towards the GMT, but that is because I like the 24 hour hand and the GMT rides better on 6.5" wrists. I have a comparison posted at the link in my .sig file.

-Sheldon

[Rob_b]

Originally Posted by Peter Hightower

I have been surfing this site and and a little torn between the two. The problem is the misses says the SD looks like my Seiko (black monster), and the GMT Pepsi looks funny. Not that her opinion matters that much, but what is msrp on each and what are your thoughts ?

My wife thinks the same thing. That my SD looks like my old SEIKO divers watch I have kept for years. I have to keep reminding her that it is actually the other diver watches that have taken the rolex design features.

Rob

[vukotab]

I LOVE SD!It`s a REAL tool watch.If you`re not diver,perhaps you should go for Pepsi.It`s lighter and more comfortable on wrist and have second time zone hand.
But SD looks very tough and rough and got that "clear" look that much people appreciate...

[frostie]

GMT since i own a gmt watch and i like gmt watches in general.

But you should find which appeals to you the most.

[Peter Hightower]

Thanks for all the info people. I am a LEO and wear the Seiko day date monster all the time. I might be reluctant to wear a Rolex at work dealing with the scumbags I sometimes deal with. Some nice people too, don't get me wrong. I like the idea that the SD is heavier than the GMT. I have yet to feel and try on both. I guess the Seiko could go to a son and then I get the SD. Any other LEO's out there who wear a Rolex on the job ? Not behind a desk but on patrol.?
It still seems a tough call, they are both awesome time pieces.

[Gurmot]

Originally Posted by Peter Hightower

Thanks for all the info people. I am a LEO and wear the Seiko day date monster all the time. I might be reluctant to wear a Rolex at work dealing with the scumbags I sometimes deal with. Some nice people too, don't get me wrong. I like the idea that the SD is heavier than the GMT. I have yet to feel and try on both. I guess the Seiko could go to a son and then I get the SD. Any other LEO's out there who wear a Rolex on the job ? Not behind a desk but on patrol.?
It still seems a tough call, they are both awesome time pieces.

Hi Peter, this is just my opinion but if I were you, I would go for the SD and keep the Monster for work. The scumbag factor plays into both GMT or SD so don't let that influence you too much. At the end of the day, you need to go and try them both on and get a feel the "ONE". You don't seem like the kind of bloke who would want to flip and change once you've bought so try them both 1st.

As I said, I am a Leo and own both watches. I wear the SD 10 to 20 times more often than I wear the GMT.

Happy hunting - Simon

[CPCC]

Originally Posted by Gurmot

Hi Peter, this is just my opinion but if I were you, I would go for the SD and keep the Monster for work. The scumbag factor plays into both GMT or SD so don't let that influence you too much. At the end of the day, you need to go and try them both on and get a feel the "ONE". You don't seem like the kind of bloke who would want to flip and change once you've bought so try them both 1st.

As I said, I am a Leo and own both watches. I wear the SD 10 to 20 times more often than I wear the GMT.

Happy hunting - Simon

If things get too hairy, you can take the SD off and whack the scumbags in the head with it. The SD is so heavy it should be able to crack a skull or two.