The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 September 2013, 02:42 AM   #1
jk88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 82
Vintage Subs vs. New Sub-Cs

I've been saving for awhile to expand my Rolex collection with a tool watch. I'm looking for something to wear every day and ease the burden placed on my two Datejusts.

Because I'm looking for a tool watch, I dive and I lead a generally active lifestyle, I think the Submariner is the best fit for me. I don't need the hour complication of the GMT Master/Explorer II and I find the Milgauss a bit nerdy ().

My dilemma is one I admit I'm happy to have:

Do I buy a new, robust Sub-C (LV, if it matters) for daily wear and make my own stories or do I buy an older Sub, save a ton of cash and keep a classic going?

I'm keen on saving almost $5k but I'm somewhat worried an older Sub's bracelet will be more prone to failure (really the pins). Is this a sound bother?

cheers
jk88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 02:46 AM   #2
luvsub
2024 Pledge Member
 
luvsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
Within the budget, I will buy a LV.
luvsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:00 AM   #3
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Its only a choice based on taste. I don't think the C is more robust or that the older bracelets would fail.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:06 AM   #4
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by capote View Post
Its only a choice based on taste. I don't think the C is more robust or that the older bracelets would fail.
Have to agree and there are far more of the older subs around than any ceramic watch and many are 30 plus years old.Myself have not heard of any major failures with the older sub bracelets, but there have been a few failures with some ceramic watch clasp bracelets.And some of my non ceramic subs and SD watches have had quite a hard life used as working tools, and spent well over 600 hours underwater fresh and salt and never a problem with bracelets or any part of the watches.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:09 AM   #5
jk88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
The older Submariner are a established and you will never loose any money on them. The newer Subs are too polarizing to many and that makes them a risky for long term desirability.
I wasn't sold on the Sub-Cs until I saw the LV and I'm not looking at this like an investment -- heck, I own two DJs, one of which I bought new... that thing depreciated quicker than a Range Rover.

Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Have to agree and there are far more of the older subs around than any ceramic watch and many are 30 plus years old.Myself have not heard of any major failures with the older sub bracelets, but there have been a few failures with some ceramic watch clasp bracelets.And some of my non ceramic subs and SD watches have had quite a hard life used as working tools, and spent well over 600 hours underwater fresh and salt and never a problem with bracelets or any part of the watches..
I assumed the glide-lock would be stronger than the older stamped clasp.
jk88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:24 AM   #6
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
Quote:
Originally Posted by jk88 View Post
I wasn't sold on the Sub-Cs until I saw the LV and I'm not looking at this like an investment -- heck, I own two DJs, one of which I bought new... that thing depreciated quicker than a Range Rover.



I assumed the glide-lock would be stronger than the older stamped clasp.
I would doubt if its any stronger in normal wearing the more complicated with more parts the more can go wrong. There have been a few weld failures with the new clasps.Even the older type Oyster bracelets have been stress tested and will take 525 lbs pressure before breaking and that's enough to seriously damage your wrist.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:27 AM   #7
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
I would doubt if its any stronger in normal wearing the more complicated with more parts the more can go wrong. There have been a few weld failures with the new clasps.Even the older type Oyster bracelets have been stress tested and will take 525 lbs pressure before breaking and that's enough to seriously damage your wrist.
didnt know that ,,, quarter of a ton ,,, enough to lift a fully kitted diver out of the water ,,, thats got to make your eyes water.
useful fact though
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:39 AM   #8
Brandon(phila)
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Phila burbs
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
I would doubt if its any stronger in normal wearing the more complicated with more parts the more can go wrong. There have been a few weld failures with the new clasps.Even the older type Oyster bracelets have been stress tested and will take 525 lbs pressure before breaking and that's enough to seriously damage your wrist.
Exactly...don't been fooled by the weight or that it rattles a little....it won't break on you. I remember over 10 years ago someone posted pictures on one of the forums of some sort of machine press thing.....trying to see how much it would take to break an older oyster bracelet....it was A LOT...so no worries.

If you have $5000 saved that should be able to get you a less than 10 year old non C Sub. Look here in the sales corner...plenty in that range.

I like the SubC but if you are truly using it for diving and high activity(I will refrain from the word "beater") I would probably go with a 10 year old or less Sub or SD.
Not sure I would go vintage for what you are looking for.
Brandon(phila) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:13 AM   #9
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,510
That is sooo true. You hear of how good and "solid" the newer bracelets are but they have yet to develop the robustness of the older bracelets. There is the reality of strength and durability and then there is the perception of durability. Rolex will make more money in 10 years on the later "perception" of robustness.

Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Myself have not heard of any major failures with the older sub bracelets, but there have been a few failures with some ceramic watch clasp bracelets..
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:02 AM   #10
Sir Larry Wildman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Lawrence
Location: London, England
Watch: Rolex, PP, JLC
Posts: 561
Personally I would go LV, but I like new everything - watches, cars, etc.
Sir Larry Wildman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2013, 10:08 PM   #11
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Larry Wildman View Post
Personally I would go LV, but I like new everything - watches, cars, etc.
Same here
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:05 AM   #12
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,510
The older Submariner are tough, reliable and established. You will never loose any money on them. The newer Subs are too polarizing to many and that makes them a risky for long term desirability. The jury is still out if they will ever be held to the same high level as the models they replaced. Personally, the cost of a ceramic bezel is a smart money making racquet for Rolex.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:11 AM   #13
Presa canary
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,155
I almost always buy preowned. And I like the older style sub better then a ceramic. Have fun choosing
Presa canary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:14 AM   #14
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
older gets my vote , simple no date and a saphire crystal ,, good all rounder ,
but its very personal .
lder if bought well certainly wont loose value anything like as fast as a new one.
pluss less likely to worry about the odd mark here and there.
much as i like solid ends etc , the old bracelet was light for a reason ,, just swap out the spring bars for a couple of new ones and your elected , or go nato , and you can stand a spring bar failure without a loss.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:21 AM   #15
james1787
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: James
Location: New Providence,NJ
Watch: Submariner 14060
Posts: 2,371
I like the looks of the older non-C watches myself.. it's all a matter of preference. You can't really go wrong with either.
james1787 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 October 2013, 01:12 AM   #16
vintagewaferthin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Earth
Watch: Air-King 5500
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by james1787 View Post
I like the looks of the older non-C watches myself.. it's all a matter of preference. You can't really go wrong with either.
So do i. I feel that the new "fat cased" ceramic subs look wuite unbalanced compared to the old classic case design.
vintagewaferthin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:34 AM   #17
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
One word "vintage"
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 04:06 AM   #18
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by landroverking View Post
One word "vintage"
2 words "vintage sub"
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:55 AM   #19
LA_LEC
"TRF" Member
 
LA_LEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,793
I would get the classic LV sub so you get the best of BOTH worlds!
__________________
1661016610LV214270 MK2
"Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!"
LA_LEC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 04:22 AM   #20
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Get the 16610LV
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 04:25 AM   #21
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Get the 16610LV
cant go wrong with that advice
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:37 PM   #22
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by LA_LEC View Post
I would get the classic LV sub so you get the best of BOTH worlds!
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Get the 16610LV
I agree!
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 03:34 PM   #23
ath1212
"TRF" Member
 
ath1212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Bill
Location: Melb Aust
Watch: AP ROO Panda
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
Get the 16610LV
I agree with Mike. But I've also added the hulk to my collection.
__________________
“Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans.” ― John Lennon
ath1212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 06:36 AM   #24
stevedssd
"TRF" Member
 
stevedssd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
Got my LVc on today, love the watch. I still prefer the simplicity of my oldie sub though! :)
stevedssd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 06:57 AM   #25
jk88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevedssd View Post
Got my LVc on today, love the watch. I still prefer the simplicity of my oldie sub though! :)
pics...
jk88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2013, 06:14 AM   #26
stevedssd
"TRF" Member
 
stevedssd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by jk88 View Post
pics...
If you insist!

Archduke - Get the ceramic Sub Date first with lume, sapphire, dealer warranty, glidelock, etc..

Then if you have enough money and still fancy an older watch for aesthetic reasons consider a 14060 / 5513 / 1680 for weekends etc.

Best of both worlds.

Yes!
Attached Images
     
stevedssd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2013, 09:02 PM   #27
Archduke
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevedssd View Post
If you insist!

Archduke - Get the ceramic Sub Date first with lume, sapphire, dealer warranty, glidelock, etc..

Then if you have enough money and still fancy an older watch for aesthetic reasons consider a 14060 / 5513 / 1680 for weekends etc.

Best of both worlds.

Yes!
@ stevedssd - great pair!
Archduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2013, 10:01 PM   #28
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon(phila) View Post
Exactly...don't been fooled by the weight or that it rattles a little....it won't break on you. I remember over 10 years ago someone posted pictures on one of the forums of some sort of machine press thing.....trying to see how much it would take to break an older oyster bracelet....it was A LOT...so no worries.

If you have $5000 saved that should be able to get you a less than 10 year old non C Sub. Look here in the sales corner...plenty in that range.

I like the SubC but if you are truly using it for diving and high activity(I will refrain from the word "beater") I would probably go with a 10 year old or less Sub or SD.
Not sure I would go vintage for what you are looking for.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gpfps View Post
With less parts and no welds I think the old clasp will hold up just fine. It's all ready proven that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Robert View Post
I like subs w/ lug holes

Attached Images
 
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 December 2013, 04:40 PM   #29
watchyou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevedssd View Post
If you insist!

Archduke - Get the ceramic Sub Date first with lume, sapphire, dealer warranty, glidelock, etc..

Then if you have enough money and still fancy an older watch for aesthetic reasons consider a 14060 / 5513 / 1680 for weekends etc.

Best of both worlds.

Yes!
x3
watchyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 06:58 AM   #30
enginerd
"TRF" Member
 
enginerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Denver, CO
Watch: Too many
Posts: 1,008
Considered the SD? 16660 or 16600...Sub on steroids and THE diver's tool watch, IMO.
enginerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.