The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 January 2014, 10:51 PM   #1
Nick_sixx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
Need opinions on potential "upgrade"

Hi guys,

Long time lurker, relatively limited poster.

I currently own and love an Explorer 214270. It has a lot going for it (absolute classic in terms of design, Bond association, "under the radar" appeal, historical significance etc), but lately I find myself lusting after an Explorer II 216570 Polar.

While not really in the same "classic" category as a Sub, DJ, or Explorer 1, I have no doubts that it will stick around long enough to be recognised as one of staples of the Rolex sports lineup.

My problem is that as a (very) junior member of the workforce, I can only afford one of the two, so simply buying the Explorer 2 is not an option unless I sell my current watch.

So far I have come up with the following pros and cons lists to try and help me make a decision

Explorer 1 Pros:

-Classic design - will never go out of style

-Brilliant dial layout

-Bond/Fleming/Everest history

-Extremely comfortable

-Not as easily recognisable as a Sub or TT DJ

-Versatile

-Very comfortable to wear



Explorer 1 Cons:

-Size is a little on the small size for me (6'0“, 220-235lb "athletic" guy with 7.25 or 7.5" wrists) - I love wearing this watch with long sleeves, but here in Queensland I only really wear long sleeves for 4 months out of the year, and I can't help but feel a little self-conscious about wearing a smaller watch with casual wear - my speedy pro feels much more comfortable with shorts and a t shirt etc.

- lack of date is proving to be an inconvenience

- weak lume

-easily scratched bezel

Explorer II Pros

- Date

- Stronger lume

-Better size for casual wear, while still remaining a respectable 42mm and not falling within the blingy Chronomat/Planet Ocean XL/DSSD category

-Usually travel overseas or interstate several times per year, meaning GMT function has proper use

-Also not as easily recognisable as Sub etc

-White dial offers diversity to my small collection

Explorer II Cons

-Not as suitable for formal/business wear

-Lack of historical significance

- WR could be better for such a "hefty" watch



I work in advertising, and literally nobody in my office is required to wear a suit, so the benefit of the "dressiness" of the explorer 1 is lost in that situation. 6 out of 7 days per week I am wearing either a polo, or OCBDS with rolled sleeves, and in these situations I prefer to wear my Speedy Pro. Seeing as the Explorer II is the same size, I can't help but feel I'd be much more comfortable wearing that instead.

Sorry for the rambling post, but I thought I would just share some of my musings and hope to gather some input on which watch you would prefer and why.



Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Nick_sixx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2014, 10:56 PM   #2
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Sorry, not sure I understand your post.

You already have an Explorer and you want a newer Explorer? You seem to write that the Explorer is too small and you would like the Explorer II more.

So buy it?
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 11:48 PM   #3
Roma315
"TRF" Member
 
Roma315's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York(Upstate)
Watch: The clock
Posts: 992
The explorer II polar always looks nice go for it
__________________
Roma315 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2014, 11:04 PM   #4
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
Go for the expII. From your post you know it is the right choice.
Cheers
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2014, 11:05 PM   #5
Presa canary
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,155
The exp ii is definitely a classic as well. I think the exp ii fits in fine with any business attire, perhaps not formal, but that's debatable. You could also look for the 40mm 16570 polar which wears more like a 41mm. I'm around your size and have owned all 3 exp ii's, the 16570 is the one i've held onto. Both explorers are great, go try on the ii and see if you like it better
Presa canary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 January 2014, 11:14 PM   #6
Ector495
"TRF" Member
 
Ector495's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 16622
Posts: 1,097
The explorer II has plenty of history.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear. - Ambrose Redmoon
Ector495 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 12:05 AM   #7
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,299
216570 has a busier look and more scratch-prone bezel, but if you like the white/orange look and want the GMT functionality and larger size, why not flip?

personally, i would stay with what you have.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 12:09 AM   #8
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
I think you have decided. It's hard to find opinions that slow down buying or trading watches here.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 12:13 AM   #9
DiamondJack
"TRF" Member
 
DiamondJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
Reading your quite detailed analysis, I think you have already sold yourself on the Explorer II........ From my perspective, even though I like the classic looks of the Explorer I, I think you will find the Polar Explorer II will have much more visual impact and be more useful with the GMT function....

Best of luck.......
DiamondJack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 12:15 AM   #10
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I personally prefer the Exp 1, but I think you think the Exp 2 is more suitable for you now, so I would advise you get that, unless you have other watches that can perform when the Exp 1 cannot, then I would keep the Exp 1 as I feel you actually love it more than the 2.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 12:17 AM   #11
Nick_sixx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
Thanks for all the responses so far.

I guess its a case of "if it ain't broken, don't fix it".

I really do love the Explorer 1, but the Explorer 2 has a lot of added benefits that I can't look past.

I'm just worried that if I flip I will regret it

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Nick_sixx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 11:50 PM   #12
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_sixx View Post
Thanks for all the responses so far.

I guess its a case of "if it ain't broken, don't fix it".

I really do love the Explorer 1, but the Explorer 2 has a lot of added benefits that I can't look past.

I'm just worried that if I flip I will regret it

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
time for the collection to start ,, not either or ,,,,, try and ,,,, job done.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 12:29 AM   #13
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
It's an easily reversed trade if you change your mind. Given your wrist size, I'd go Exp2.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 12:30 AM   #14
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
It's always such a personal decision. I think you've layed out the pro's and con's nicely.

For me the EXP II would be the winner becaused of the versatility of the second timezone, larger size and increased lume.

That is has the throw back orange hand is also a big plus.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 12:50 AM   #15
Roll the Lex
"TRF" Member
 
Roll the Lex's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
If you like your exp 1 then I'd say keep it and save up for the exp 2. Even if it takes years.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roll the Lex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 January 2014, 01:35 AM   #16
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
It's a logical flip for you. You have done your homework, so...Do it!
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 09:37 PM   #17
Nick_sixx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
Thanks for the input guys. Going to mull it over for a couple of weeks, but I've started to hunt around for a few sellers

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Nick_sixx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 09:43 PM   #18
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
Sounds like you need to give the 216570 a try.
As Mike said, you can easily reaquire the Exp1 if you find yourself regretting the move.
I personally would keep what you already have.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 11:22 PM   #19
DavW
"TRF" Member
 
DavW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: Cornwall
Watch: Explorer 2 216570
Posts: 116
Hey Nick. If I were you I'd go for the Explorer 2. It's the absolute perfect size especially for a larger guy. Don't rule out the black dial though.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DavW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 11:28 PM   #20
Nick_sixx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavW View Post
Hey Nick. If I were you I'd go for the Explorer 2. It's the absolute perfect size especially for a larger guy. Don't rule out the black dial though.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hey Dave. I was actually just checking out your pics on WUS.

I don't know why exactly, but for me the white dial seems to be the only contender...kind of in the same way that if you were buying a 458 Italia, red might be the obvious choice.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Nick_sixx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 11:34 PM   #21
DavW
"TRF" Member
 
DavW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: Cornwall
Watch: Explorer 2 216570
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_sixx View Post
Hey Dave. I was actually just checking out your pics on WUS.

I don't know why exactly, but for me the white dial seems to be the only contender...kind of in the same way that if you were buying a 458 Italia, red might be the obvious choice.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Fair enough :) although the original only came with a black dial, the white was introduced later.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DavW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 11:40 PM   #22
Nick_sixx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavW View Post
Fair enough :) although the original only came with a black dial, the white was introduced later.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Haha I read something about 6 months ago online where somebody was trying to decide between the black and white dial versions, and somebody said something similar to my Ferrari example (using a different analogy) and it just kinda stuck with me.....and now I can't seem to think any differently

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Nick_sixx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 11:47 PM   #23
DavW
"TRF" Member
 
DavW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: Cornwall
Watch: Explorer 2 216570
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick_sixx View Post
Haha I read something about 6 months ago online where somebody was trying to decide between the black and white dial versions,
That was probably me! Ha:) I droned on for ages about which colour to get, then when I finally did decide (bought the white one) I decided I'd made the wrong choice, haha. Looking forward to seeing what you decide to do:)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DavW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2014, 11:40 PM   #24
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
Id go for exp ii myself
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2014, 04:41 AM   #25
Jat
"TRF" Member
 
Jat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Princeton, NJ
Watch: 216570BK
Posts: 235
you will love the expII. both colors are great... i have it black. personally, i think the white one looks a bit more sporty and flashy, so it all depends on personal choices..... good luck!
Jat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2014, 05:28 AM   #26
samsam
"TRF" Member
 
samsam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,826
It's clear to me that you would like the ExpII more. Go with it. Very nice piece, you'll be pleased.


Sent from Earth.
samsam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2014, 07:44 AM   #27
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
Polar EXPII is the watch you want.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2014, 02:50 PM   #28
Nick_sixx
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
I tried on the watch again today. It is growing on me more and more by the day. The size feels great for a casual watch...but worried that it might be too big... Any thoughts?




For comparison, a PO XL (45.5mm) and my current Exp 1 (39mm)




Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Nick_sixx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2014, 05:00 PM   #29
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Polar looks fine for you... but you need to work out a bit more.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 January 2014, 05:12 PM   #30
kimnkk
"TRF" Member
 
kimnkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 103
Definitely does not look too small.

If anything, the PO on that mesh looks too small on you despite being 45mm.
kimnkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.