ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
7 January 2014, 10:51 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
|
Need opinions on potential "upgrade"
Hi guys,
Long time lurker, relatively limited poster. I currently own and love an Explorer 214270. It has a lot going for it (absolute classic in terms of design, Bond association, "under the radar" appeal, historical significance etc), but lately I find myself lusting after an Explorer II 216570 Polar. While not really in the same "classic" category as a Sub, DJ, or Explorer 1, I have no doubts that it will stick around long enough to be recognised as one of staples of the Rolex sports lineup. My problem is that as a (very) junior member of the workforce, I can only afford one of the two, so simply buying the Explorer 2 is not an option unless I sell my current watch. So far I have come up with the following pros and cons lists to try and help me make a decision Explorer 1 Pros: -Classic design - will never go out of style -Brilliant dial layout -Bond/Fleming/Everest history -Extremely comfortable -Not as easily recognisable as a Sub or TT DJ -Versatile -Very comfortable to wear Explorer 1 Cons: -Size is a little on the small size for me (6'0“, 220-235lb "athletic" guy with 7.25 or 7.5" wrists) - I love wearing this watch with long sleeves, but here in Queensland I only really wear long sleeves for 4 months out of the year, and I can't help but feel a little self-conscious about wearing a smaller watch with casual wear - my speedy pro feels much more comfortable with shorts and a t shirt etc. - lack of date is proving to be an inconvenience - weak lume -easily scratched bezel Explorer II Pros - Date - Stronger lume -Better size for casual wear, while still remaining a respectable 42mm and not falling within the blingy Chronomat/Planet Ocean XL/DSSD category -Usually travel overseas or interstate several times per year, meaning GMT function has proper use -Also not as easily recognisable as Sub etc -White dial offers diversity to my small collection Explorer II Cons -Not as suitable for formal/business wear -Lack of historical significance - WR could be better for such a "hefty" watch I work in advertising, and literally nobody in my office is required to wear a suit, so the benefit of the "dressiness" of the explorer 1 is lost in that situation. 6 out of 7 days per week I am wearing either a polo, or OCBDS with rolled sleeves, and in these situations I prefer to wear my Speedy Pro. Seeing as the Explorer II is the same size, I can't help but feel I'd be much more comfortable wearing that instead. Sorry for the rambling post, but I thought I would just share some of my musings and hope to gather some input on which watch you would prefer and why. Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk |
7 January 2014, 10:56 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Sorry, not sure I understand your post.
You already have an Explorer and you want a newer Explorer? You seem to write that the Explorer is too small and you would like the Explorer II more. So buy it?
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
9 January 2014, 11:48 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New York(Upstate)
Watch: The clock
Posts: 992
|
The explorer II polar always looks nice go for it
__________________
|
7 January 2014, 11:04 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
|
Go for the expII. From your post you know it is the right choice.
Cheers
__________________
"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795 |
7 January 2014, 11:05 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,155
|
The exp ii is definitely a classic as well. I think the exp ii fits in fine with any business attire, perhaps not formal, but that's debatable. You could also look for the 40mm 16570 polar which wears more like a 41mm. I'm around your size and have owned all 3 exp ii's, the 16570 is the one i've held onto. Both explorers are great, go try on the ii and see if you like it better
|
7 January 2014, 11:14 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: North Carolina
Watch: 16622
Posts: 1,097
|
The explorer II has plenty of history.
__________________
Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgement that something else is more important than fear. - Ambrose Redmoon |
8 January 2014, 12:05 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,299
|
216570 has a busier look and more scratch-prone bezel, but if you like the white/orange look and want the GMT functionality and larger size, why not flip?
personally, i would stay with what you have. |
8 January 2014, 12:09 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
I think you have decided. It's hard to find opinions that slow down buying or trading watches here.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
8 January 2014, 12:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
|
Reading your quite detailed analysis, I think you have already sold yourself on the Explorer II........ From my perspective, even though I like the classic looks of the Explorer I, I think you will find the Polar Explorer II will have much more visual impact and be more useful with the GMT function....
Best of luck....... |
8 January 2014, 12:15 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
I personally prefer the Exp 1, but I think you think the Exp 2 is more suitable for you now, so I would advise you get that, unless you have other watches that can perform when the Exp 1 cannot, then I would keep the Exp 1 as I feel you actually love it more than the 2.
|
8 January 2014, 12:17 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
|
Thanks for all the responses so far.
I guess its a case of "if it ain't broken, don't fix it". I really do love the Explorer 1, but the Explorer 2 has a lot of added benefits that I can't look past. I'm just worried that if I flip I will regret it Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk |
9 January 2014, 11:50 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
Quote:
|
|
8 January 2014, 12:29 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
It's an easily reversed trade if you change your mind. Given your wrist size, I'd go Exp2.
|
8 January 2014, 12:30 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
It's always such a personal decision. I think you've layed out the pro's and con's nicely.
For me the EXP II would be the winner becaused of the versatility of the second timezone, larger size and increased lume. That is has the throw back orange hand is also a big plus. |
8 January 2014, 01:35 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
|
It's a logical flip for you. You have done your homework, so...Do it!
__________________
"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way." Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778 "Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc |
9 January 2014, 09:37 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
|
Thanks for the input guys. Going to mull it over for a couple of weeks, but I've started to hunt around for a few sellers
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk |
9 January 2014, 09:43 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
|
Sounds like you need to give the 216570 a try.
As Mike said, you can easily reaquire the Exp1 if you find yourself regretting the move. I personally would keep what you already have. |
9 January 2014, 11:22 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: Cornwall
Watch: Explorer 2 216570
Posts: 116
|
Hey Nick. If I were you I'd go for the Explorer 2. It's the absolute perfect size especially for a larger guy. Don't rule out the black dial though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 January 2014, 11:28 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
I don't know why exactly, but for me the white dial seems to be the only contender...kind of in the same way that if you were buying a 458 Italia, red might be the obvious choice. Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk |
|
9 January 2014, 11:34 PM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: Cornwall
Watch: Explorer 2 216570
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 January 2014, 11:40 PM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk |
|
9 January 2014, 11:47 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: Cornwall
Watch: Explorer 2 216570
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 January 2014, 11:40 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Id go for exp ii myself
|
10 January 2014, 04:41 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Princeton, NJ
Watch: 216570BK
Posts: 235
|
you will love the expII. both colors are great... i have it black. personally, i think the white one looks a bit more sporty and flashy, so it all depends on personal choices..... good luck!
|
10 January 2014, 05:28 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,826
|
It's clear to me that you would like the ExpII more. Go with it. Very nice piece, you'll be pleased.
Sent from Earth. |
10 January 2014, 07:44 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
|
Polar EXPII is the watch you want.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time |
10 January 2014, 02:50 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 24
|
I tried on the watch again today. It is growing on me more and more by the day. The size feels great for a casual watch...but worried that it might be too big... Any thoughts?
For comparison, a PO XL (45.5mm) and my current Exp 1 (39mm) Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk |
10 January 2014, 05:00 PM | #29 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Polar looks fine for you... but you need to work out a bit more.
|
10 January 2014, 05:12 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 103
|
Definitely does not look too small.
If anything, the PO on that mesh looks too small on you despite being 45mm. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.