ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 March 2014, 07:09 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: london
Posts: 416
|
Explorer 39mm or submariner ND
I currently have a explorer 39mm, however lately I have been thinking about exchanging it for the last of the 14060m sub ND.
Any thoughts, I love the simple lines if the explorer, I also love the sportiness of the sub. I am torn as to what to do, and hope some opinions could help me decide. |
26 March 2014, 07:10 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
both great watches, but if I had the choice I would go with the sub
|
26 March 2014, 07:14 AM | #3 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,242
|
I have the 14060M and hopefully my next Rolex will be the Explorer I. Sounds to me like you might regret flipping the Exp, maybe save for the Sub, I really think that they compliment each other. Here's a pic to whet your appetite...
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
26 March 2014, 07:18 AM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: london
Posts: 416
|
Quote:
Would my explorer plus between £500-750 be a fair deal for the sub? |
|
26 March 2014, 07:30 AM | #5 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,242
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
|
26 March 2014, 07:32 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: london
Posts: 416
|
|
26 March 2014, 07:12 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: london
Posts: 416
|
I guess the sub is more versatile. I would need to add some cash for the sub along with my explorer. Both are 2011 watches.
|
26 March 2014, 09:59 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
I have both, and the Sub is certainly one of the definitive models in the Rolex line. As for versatility, I would place the Explorer well ahead of the Sub...it can be worn where the Sub looks out of place, Ian Fleming characters not withstanding. And the clasp and bracelet are an upgrade to the Sub you're considering, so there is another point to consider. My Explorer is my daily wearer, perhaps the one in my small collection not likely to be flipped.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
26 March 2014, 07:14 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Manny
Location: MA
Watch: DD,Sub,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 4,510
|
I really like the both watches, if I had to choose though I would go with the sub.
I like sporty watches and it dresses up really well. You really can't go wrong with either watch! =) |
26 March 2014, 07:15 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: New York
Watch: Milgauss
Posts: 297
|
sub nd
|
26 March 2014, 07:17 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 64,277
|
For one watch I'd go w/ the explorer
It could be sporty & dressy! It's my go to watch, works well in all settings
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
26 March 2014, 07:31 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
|
Between those two i pick sub
|
26 March 2014, 07:33 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: london
Posts: 416
|
What the value of a 2011 full set 14060 - I value it around £4000, I value my explorer around £3500 2011 full set.
Would you agree? |
26 March 2014, 07:36 AM | #14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,242
|
With both being equal and excellent condition I'd say you're in the ballpark. That's my assumption though as I'd only be able to figure in dollars... Mate!
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
28 March 2014, 07:35 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Zoran
Location: EU
Watch: 1655 Mark 1
Posts: 1,010
|
Quote:
I love the Sub and own one. However, 4000£ is a bit steep for a mint set. I bought mine 4 months ago in mint condition (2012 G-Serial) and payed 3100£. Similar can be found here in the For Sale section Good luck with the hunt. Definitely one of the most comfortable watches in my line-up
__________________
|
|
26 March 2014, 07:37 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
Yes! There is no wrong answer.
First one then the other..... I'd vote for the expy first. Less common and super comfortable.
__________________
member#3242 |
26 March 2014, 07:42 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,258
|
Have the Explorer, great watch. Just was at AD looking at Sub's, etc, today.
I would have a very difficult time giving up my Explorer for a Sub. It's just too versatile. Getting both is the right answer. IMHO, anyway.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N |
26 March 2014, 07:47 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
I'm a big fan of the understated, no nonsense looks and functionality of a ss DJ or Exp in 36mm and really like the 38-40mm size of the newer Exp and Sub. So, I don't think you can go wrong with either, but I've got to say that I'm always impressed with just how pretty a Sub actually is. I've worn Rolex for 40 years, and if I ever had to limit myself to one watch (any brand), I think it would be a black bezel Sub or GMT in ss or tt.
|
26 March 2014, 07:51 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Real Name: Ruk
Location: .ie
Watch: 5711,Sub,Daytona,P
Posts: 1,232
|
Sub Sub Sub... feels a lot better on the wrist
|
26 March 2014, 07:55 AM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: london
Posts: 416
|
I think I'm even more confused now than earlier, I know they are both great watches!
Decisions, decisions! |
26 March 2014, 07:59 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
|
Just read my name
__________________
|
26 March 2014, 08:10 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
|
Chaps
There is no definitive answer to this because we all have different values and taste. I value discretion above all else and I wanted a brilliant watch that I could wear all the time and I did not want anyone else to notice it. I therefore bought a 39mm Explorer1. It is a wonderfully discrete watch and it is for me at least, a watch that I will wear on the day that I die. A Sub on the other hand screams ROLEX and that alone will mean that I will never wear one. Having said that, a Sub is the watch that some of you chaps would sell your wife for, so it is in all honesty, horses for courses. Only the OP can decide on this one. Regards Mick |
2 April 2014, 01:16 PM | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Australia
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
|
|
26 March 2014, 10:06 AM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Sub all day long
|
26 March 2014, 10:08 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Watch: Wilsdorf(s)
Posts: 10,258
|
Agree with the above, as to versatility of the Explorer. I can wear it anywhere because it flies under the radar. I like that. Were I to have a Sub (especially the C given the reflection off the bezel), I would wear it to a lesser degree. But that's just me.
__________________
Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N |
26 March 2014, 10:52 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Watch: 14060M & 1601
Posts: 180
|
Go the 14060M Sub. Amazing watch.
|
26 March 2014, 10:53 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
|
Sub of course.
__________________
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive. " |
26 March 2014, 11:11 AM | #28 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Date & No Date
Posts: 10,868
|
Really difficult decision. You could always get the Sub and if it doesn't work out, go back to the Explorer I 39mm. I personally think the 14060M is a gem/masterpiece.
__________________
"You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die." Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca |
26 March 2014, 11:14 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Both great watches, but if I had to only have one, it would be the Sub.
|
26 March 2014, 11:18 AM | #30 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Get an older 14060m, say a Y serial, then you will get much better value.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.