ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
9 April 2014, 03:24 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UAE
Watch: Rolex Sea dweller
Posts: 12
|
Sea dweller 16600 vs GMT master.
Hi,
I just wanted to hear from you guys, which one of the above two you prefer and why. I already have a Sea dweller M serial, and thinking of selling it and get the GMT master. Your opinions please. Thanks in advance Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 April 2014, 04:53 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
Well that would depend on what you want to use the watch for if you travel a lot and need a second time zone function then get the GMT.But myself see no point in changing if you do not need that function,perhaps I am a bit bias as the SD is my favorite watch in the Rolex line up.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
9 April 2014, 05:02 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
I have the GMT Master 2 and the 16600 and I've put a deposit down on the new SD 116600.
Not sure yet whether or not I need to flip either the GMT or the current SD in order to purchase the 116600; I'm hoping not as I love both, but if I do, it will be the GMT. That pretty clearly states my position. Hope it's helpful.
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
9 April 2014, 05:06 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UAE
Watch: Rolex Sea dweller
Posts: 12
|
Many thanks for your replies,
actually I love my SD and leaning toward keeping it. I'll start to save for the GMT and keep them both Regards Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 April 2014, 05:19 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
keep what you've got
|
9 April 2014, 05:35 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
|
Never sell or flip, just ADD
__________________
Best Regards, Jason Just Say "NO" to Polishing Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches PLEXI IS SEXY |
9 April 2014, 05:47 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Lester
Location: manila,philippine
Watch: Rolex Sub/BLNR
Posts: 60
|
Hi,
Do really need to sell the Sea Dweller? Why not have both? Both are great watch. But it depends on your needs. |
9 April 2014, 06:12 PM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
|
Quote:
If as I suspect, you do not do much of either, then it is purely a question of appearance and only you can decide that. Mick |
|
9 April 2014, 06:30 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Denmark
Watch: UJ Alfred 40
Posts: 216
|
Don't sell the Sea-Dweller. You will regret it later.
__________________
Don't drink out of ornamental ponds in Tiergarten. You will get sick. |
9 April 2014, 07:35 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UAE
Watch: Rolex Sea dweller
Posts: 12
|
Thank you all for the feedback,
I love my SD and sure will keep it after hearing all that. But still very interested and keen to get the GMT Master. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 April 2014, 08:04 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Gold Sub 116618LN
Posts: 2,820
|
Well, one's a dive watch & the other is a pilot/travel watch for keeping track of extra time zones. Get what you need & want.
__________________
Things are more like they are now than they ever were before. |
9 April 2014, 08:07 PM | #12 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
Keep your SD and add a GMT and then you will have 2 great watches! Cheers,
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
9 April 2014, 08:12 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Bob
Location: IL
Posts: 825
|
I have both, keep the SD and save for a GMT II preferably a P,K,Y series.
|
9 April 2014, 09:16 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: UAE
Watch: Rolex Sea dweller
Posts: 12
|
Ok, now let's ask the question in a different way:
Which one of the two hold it's value best Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
10 April 2014, 04:36 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Denmark
Watch: UJ Alfred 40
Posts: 216
|
A completely shameless guess, with no research or anything to back it up: The 16600.
__________________
Don't drink out of ornamental ponds in Tiergarten. You will get sick. |
10 April 2014, 04:41 AM | #16 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
Quote:
I'd say it's a good bet that they will both hold their value well. |
|
10 April 2014, 04:46 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,253
|
Hi,
The second time zone only comes into its own when you have no external means of checking the time; most of us can check the time at home by looking on the phone. So go for the one you like the best! |
10 April 2014, 05:00 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,601
|
Complimentary pieces for sure, but if only one i would choose the function that would be more useful to me.
Timing bezel Vs Additional timezones
__________________
|
10 April 2014, 09:22 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 976
|
Personally I would hold on to the SD, I feel it's the best of all dive watches, no cyclops, but a date, clear readability and straight forward design. And the GMT in whatever version is a fantastic compliment to that...I could see a GMTc with a more modern design and technology, but also a similar vintage Pepsi or Coke for the style and swagger.
|
10 April 2014, 09:44 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Here!
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 4,366
|
Yup keep the SD and save for the GMT.
__________________
16610LN | 16613LB | 16710 Pepsi | 118238 | 116500 (White) | 116500 (Black) | 116710BLNR | 116610LV "The one thing I fear most is time; time waits for no one and leaves no options."
|
10 April 2014, 09:58 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: So Cal
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 5,087
|
Keep the SD and get the new one!
|
10 April 2014, 10:02 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
I see a lot more GMTs than SDs.
|
10 April 2014, 10:33 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
|
I would keep both, I still miss my numerous SDs that I have had and I will acquire another. I always liked how the SD was a little beefier than the GMT, as mentioned earlier the second time zone function would be the only draw (if you need it)
|
10 April 2014, 10:43 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
The GMT is both substantially flatter, and marginally larger wearing due to the larger dial. They're really rather different in ways that have nothing to due with the 24h hand.
|
10 April 2014, 10:53 AM | #25 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,512
|
Don't sell. The replacement cost is far too great in the future!
|
10 April 2014, 03:50 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: George
Location: Sydney
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,104
|
|
10 April 2014, 11:12 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Both super watches so you cannot go wrong! SD definitely wears a bit 'top heavier' than the GMT, but is still very comfortable.
If you can manage it, you might hold onto the SD and go for the GMT in due course as another watch. Good luck! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.