The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 8 May 2014, 09:03 AM   #1
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
114060 or 116600

I love my 114060 but the new SD looks amazing, I can't have both so what would you do?
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 09:24 AM   #2
sleddog
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
sleddog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,931
The heart wants what it wants!!

To be serious, both are great.... Do what you think is best for the wallet, and the soul! Good luck!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!!

TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member..
sleddog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 09:33 AM   #3
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
Sub
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 09:38 AM   #4
nauticajoe
"TRF" Member
 
nauticajoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
SDC for me.
nauticajoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 09:38 AM   #5
slm9555
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 617
Sub for sure, sd isn't worth the money imo
slm9555 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 10:29 AM   #6
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by slm9555 View Post
Sub for sure, sd isn't worth the money imo
Totally agree
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 09:38 AM   #7
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
I prefer the 114060.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 09:50 AM   #8
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
Sub
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 10:02 AM   #9
Robb
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Robb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Robb
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 4,939
SD-c for me
__________________
126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN
Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 10:25 AM   #10
brettpaul
"TRF" Member
 
brettpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
Don't have the SDc yet, but do love my 114060.... for me it's the right balance of classic simplicity and modern technology
brettpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 10:34 AM   #11
viper9669
"TRF" Member
 
viper9669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
Both have similarities, and differences, I'd vote 114060 but need to make a trip to the retailer to look at the 116600 once its in, hopefully soon.
viper9669 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 10:52 AM   #12
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
The Sub is just such a solid piece. On this site, you'll find the choice debatable. In the real world, real people, even those who appreciate nice watches, will give you a blank stare and ask "huh?"
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 10:59 AM   #13
The Sub-lime One
"TRF" Member
 
The Sub-lime One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Dee
Location: London
Posts: 929
Sub... No questions!
The Sub-lime One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 11:01 AM   #14
dodge2002
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: usa
Posts: 84
sub
dodge2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 01:53 PM   #15
CDNWatchNut
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Sherwood Park, Ab
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,509
I would keep the 114060, but I'm not drawn to the 116600. If you are, you should make the switch!
CDNWatchNut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 08:38 PM   #16
Robbyman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Blighty (England)
Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub
Posts: 1,517
SDc - those Sub lugs are awful. Believe me, I have one!
Robbyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 08:40 PM   #17
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
Submariner.
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 08:46 PM   #18
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
For me they are very similar, the main difference is greyish matte dial or black glossy dial, the latter I prefer to match the bezel on the ceramics.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 08:49 PM   #19
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,834
Without question: 114060

They are different. Sure.

But they are so very similar. No sense paying all that money for such a similar watch.

And personally, I much prefer the sub. No contest.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 09:02 PM   #20
Der Meister
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by simongpaez View Post
I love my 114060 but the new SD looks amazing, I can't have both so what would you do?
..sell the sub
Der Meister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 May 2014, 09:39 PM   #21
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,801
I prefer the 114060 as it is my go to watch. I have not seen the SDC in the flesh but can see the appeal. I would wait a short time to see if the feeling of wanting the new watch stays with you. The flip would be costly to go to the SDC and by waiting the excitement for the new watch may calm down and you could save a few dollars.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 12:22 AM   #22
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
Thanks for the comments I do love my Sub and there is no way I could let it go.
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 12:31 AM   #23
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,500
Tough call. I'm yet to see the 116600, but it's hard to not want a 114060 in your collection.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 01:12 AM   #24
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by simongpaez View Post
Thanks for the comments I do love my Sub and there is no way I could let it go.
Now you just need to stick to your decision!
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 12:47 AM   #25
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,602
If the case shapes were the same, it would be a toss up.

But comparing the two, the SDC lugs and crown guards are a necessity for me.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 12:49 AM   #26
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
Sub. But I'm biased.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 01:01 AM   #27
lmcgbaj
"TRF" Member
 
lmcgbaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
Sub for sure. This is after trying the 116600.
__________________
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive. "
lmcgbaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 01:19 AM   #28
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
SDC by a country mile. They are not similar in my view.

Differences that immediately spring to mind.

1. Fully graduated bezel
2. Helium Escape Valve
3. Matte/Satin dial
4. Date
5. Raised crystal
6. Divers Extension
7. Significant additional depth rating
8. Deeper case
9. Slimmer and shorter lugs, changing the shape significantly
10. Less square crown guards
11. Much less common (never seen another SD in the wild (old or new)

It's perfectly ok to prefer the Sub, but to say they are really similar is just not true.
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 04:33 AM   #29
andyol1966
"TRF" Member
 
andyol1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Andy
Location: East Midlands, UK
Watch: Patek and Rolex
Posts: 1,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Token74 View Post
SDC by a country mile. They are not similar in my view.

Differences that immediately spring to mind.

1. Fully graduated bezel
2. Helium Escape Valve
3. Matte/Satin dial
4. Date
5. Raised crystal
6. Divers Extension
7. Significant additional depth rating
8. Deeper case
9. Slimmer and shorter lugs, changing the shape significantly
10. Less square crown guards
11. Much less common (never seen another SD in the wild (old or new)

It's perfectly ok to prefer the Sub, but to say they are really similar is just not true.
X 1000 totally agree
andyol1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 May 2014, 06:14 AM   #30
kahoot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 425
SD c

Quote:
Originally Posted by Token74 View Post
SDC by a country mile. They are not similar in my view.

Differences that immediately spring to mind.

1. Fully graduated bezel
2. Helium Escape Valve
3. Matte/Satin dial
4. Date
5. Raised crystal
6. Divers Extension
7. Significant additional depth rating
8. Deeper case
9. Slimmer and shorter lugs, changing the shape significantly
10. Less square crown guards
11. Much less common (never seen another SD in the wild (old or new)

It's perfectly ok to prefer the Sub, but to say they are really similar is just not true.
SD over the sub date ceramic and non date ceramic no question IMHO It might be expensive but to compare it with sub non date is a bit unfair.
__________________
SDC 4000
Explorer 2
kahoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.