ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

baseballduck · 4 July 2005, 11:59 AM

I was wondering if the cyclops on the Submariner(and most models) ever gets annoying if you're not use to one. This may be personal preference although I'm not sure. The reason I ask is because my current watch(Seiko chronograph) does not have a cyclops. I don't really know why I'm asking this. I guess it's so I'll know when I hopefully get a Rolex sometime in the future.......the far far future.

Thanks, Tyler

Uncle-AJ · 4 July 2005, 12:01 PM

I find in rooms filled with high powered lights and sometimes in bright sunlight, there's a lot of reflection from the cyclops.

baseballduck · 4 July 2005, 12:15 PM

Thanks, also one more question do you find Submariners to be durable enough for everyday wear? I wear my watches every day to school which includes two "breaks" a.k.a. outside time, and I don't want to scratch and or harm the watch into oblivion. lol

Thanks, Tyler

Uncle-AJ · 4 July 2005, 12:19 PM

Submariners are very durable but over time (many years) stretch will occur in the bracelet. You could avoid this by fitting a Nato strap, which is a composite buckle strap. James Bond style.

baseballduck · 4 July 2005, 12:26 PM

Cool sounding combo, thanks for the advice.

dman · 4 July 2005, 01:29 PM

The cyclops is personal preference, if you don't want it there is always the SD, very cool watch. As far as everyday wear, even the DJ is durable and will take whatever you could throw at it!

padi56 · 4 July 2005, 05:04 PM

Myself not a great lover of the cyclops prefer the clean Crystal of the SD.But don't
mind the cyclops underneath crystal like in the Panerai.

Uncle-AJ · 4 July 2005, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

Myself not a great lover of the cyclops prefer the clean Crystal of the SD.But don't
mind the cyclops underneath crystal like in the Panerai.

I've got to agree, the Panerai inverted cyclops takes some beating.

Gedanken · 4 July 2005, 05:48 PM

It's probably a matter of personal preference, but I've never had a problem with the cyclops. When I first got it (on the DJ), I was a bit worried that its protrusion would make it vulnerable to damage - I couldn't be more wrong.

As dman said, any Rolex Oyster is very durable, especially if it's all SS (18K does tend to scratch easily). My SD's been with me through everything and still looks great.

dfn8tly · 5 July 2005, 04:27 AM

The cyclops can come in handy for some of us more "mature" gentlemen who's arms aren't quite long enough to view the date without a little assistance.

Richard

Uncle-AJ · 5 July 2005, 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dfn8tly

The cyclops can come in handy for some of us more "mature" gentlemen who's arms aren't quite long enough to view the date without a little assistance.

Richard

I always carry my spectacles.

dman · 5 July 2005, 05:24 AM

Adrian, I too quite like the inverted cyclops on my 27C, I might make old jokes, but I am blind as a bat without my glasses/contacts. The worst part is, I am not a candidate for LASIK surgery.

Uncle-AJ · 5 July 2005, 05:27 AM

Fortunately my eye sight has just deteriorated with age. I have only had two pairs of spectacles and I'm told it should not get any worse. I only wear mine for reading, my distance vision is perfect.

5 July 2005, 05:55 AM

Like Adrian, I find the cyclops a tad difficult in certain light, and not always visible at certain angles, forcing you to centre the watch in your gaze and stare lovingly at the dial (wow, was that a JJ flashback???).

The bracelet will stretch over time, but cleaning will certainly prolong the bracelet life. They dont' stretch from being worn tight... rather from dirt messing up the link bushings.

As for Lasik... Daren it sucks to be you. Getting Lasik was the best money I've ever spent.

Earl · 6 July 2005, 01:46 AM

All very good come backs and advice, well done guys. btw, seen the hijacking taking place but seen it was only a deture !!!!!

dman · 6 July 2005, 04:46 AM

What is this stuff about hijacking and who was involved? I'll get guys just point them out to me.

4 July 2005, 11:59 AM	#1
baseballduck "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Tyler Location: Pinehurst NC Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 1,018	Cyclops I was wondering if the cyclops on the Submariner(and most models) ever gets annoying if you're not use to one. This may be personal preference although I'm not sure. The reason I ask is because my current watch(Seiko chronograph) does not have a cyclops. I don't really know why I'm asking this. I guess it's so I'll know when I hopefully get a Rolex sometime in the future.......the far far future. Thanks, Tyler

4 July 2005, 05:48 PM	#9
Gedanken "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Sir Location: Melbourne Watch: F-series SD Posts: 8,589	It's probably a matter of personal preference, but I've never had a problem with the cyclops. When I first got it (on the DJ), I was a bit worried that its protrusion would make it vulnerable to damage - I couldn't be more wrong. As dman said, any Rolex Oyster is very durable, especially if it's all SS (18K does tend to scratch easily). My SD's been with me through everything and still looks great. __________________ You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

4 July 2005, 12:01 PM	#2
Uncle-AJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Real Name: Adrian Location: Bolton, UK. Watch: Daytona 116520 Posts: 6,844	I find in rooms filled with high powered lights and sometimes in bright sunlight, there's a lot of reflection from the cyclops.

4 July 2005, 12:15 PM	#3
baseballduck "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Tyler Location: Pinehurst NC Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 1,018	Thanks, also one more question do you find Submariners to be durable enough for everyday wear? I wear my watches every day to school which includes two "breaks" a.k.a. outside time, and I don't want to scratch and or harm the watch into oblivion. lol Thanks, Tyler

4 July 2005, 12:19 PM	#4
Uncle-AJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Real Name: Adrian Location: Bolton, UK. Watch: Daytona 116520 Posts: 6,844	Submariners are very durable but over time (many years) stretch will occur in the bracelet. You could avoid this by fitting a Nato strap, which is a composite buckle strap. James Bond style.

4 July 2005, 12:26 PM	#5
baseballduck "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Tyler Location: Pinehurst NC Watch: Explorer 214270 Posts: 1,018	Cool sounding combo, thanks for the advice.

4 July 2005, 01:29 PM	#6
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	The cyclops is personal preference, if you don't want it there is always the SD, very cool watch. As far as everyday wear, even the DJ is durable and will take whatever you could throw at it!

4 July 2005, 05:04 PM	#7
padi56 "TRF" Life Patron Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Peter Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng Watch: ing you. Posts: 53,045	Myself not a great lover of the cyclops prefer the clean Crystal of the SD.But don't mind the cyclops underneath crystal like in the Panerai.

5 July 2005, 04:27 AM	#10
dfn8tly Member Join Date: Jun 2005 Real Name: Richard Location: The Villages, FL Watch: GMT-II Posts: 396	The cyclops can come in handy for some of us more "mature" gentlemen who's arms aren't quite long enough to view the date without a little assistance. Richard

5 July 2005, 05:24 AM	#12
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	Adrian, I too quite like the inverted cyclops on my 27C, I might make old jokes, but I am blind as a bat without my glasses/contacts. The worst part is, I am not a candidate for LASIK surgery.

5 July 2005, 05:27 AM	#13
Uncle-AJ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2004 Real Name: Adrian Location: Bolton, UK. Watch: Daytona 116520 Posts: 6,844	Fortunately my eye sight has just deteriorated with age. I have only had two pairs of spectacles and I'm told it should not get any worse. I only wear mine for reading, my distance vision is perfect.

5 July 2005, 05:55 AM	#14
Atomic Guest Posts: n/a	Like Adrian, I find the cyclops a tad difficult in certain light, and not always visible at certain angles, forcing you to centre the watch in your gaze and stare lovingly at the dial (wow, was that a JJ flashback???). The bracelet will stretch over time, but cleaning will certainly prolong the bracelet life. They dont' stretch from being worn tight... rather from dirt messing up the link bushings. As for Lasik... Daren it sucks to be you. Getting Lasik was the best money I've ever spent.

6 July 2005, 01:46 AM	#15
Earl "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Who Me? Location: Northern Virginia Watch: out Posts: 4,616	All very good come backs and advice, well done guys. btw, seen the hijacking taking place but seen it was only a deture !!!!!

6 July 2005, 04:46 AM	#16
dman Lifetime TRF Patron Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Daren Location: Austin Watch: the road Posts: 13,585	What is this stuff about hijacking and who was involved? I'll get guys just point them out to me.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)