|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
8 October 2014, 02:11 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
|
Pam 104, should I?
Hi guys, thought about adding the 104 to the stable, so far I have 422, 164, 112, to name a few.
Anyone had any negative experiences with the 104? Thanks in advance guys! |
|
|
|
8 October 2014, 03:27 PM
|
#2 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,296
|
Nothing wrong with the 104 (Mystro has some great pix), but, with you having two Bettarini cases and three crown guards, maybe it's time for a Radiomir? 1940s or otherwise? So many great options.... 232, 249, 572, 587, 190, 514, 292, 210, 424, 425, 449....
|
|
|
|
|
8 October 2014, 05:00 PM
|
#3 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
|
Quote:
Thank you Cru, I will take a look at the Radiomir range, as well as the 1940 case range. *saw the 424 no date a few hours ago, very nice! |
|
|
|
|
|
30 October 2014, 09:49 AM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 October 2014, 10:12 AM
|
#5 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Real Name: Patrick
Location: SIN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 5,066
|
Quote:
The 104 is automatic👍 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 October 2014, 10:38 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 27
|
Purchased a new 104 and love it. I like it more then my 233 that I sold
|
|
|
|
|
30 October 2014, 10:57 AM
|
#7 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 324
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 October 2014, 01:48 PM
|
#8 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami Beach FL US
Posts: 1,425
|
Thanks
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 October 2014, 10:10 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 27
|
I recently purchased a Pam 104 and love it. The painted dial is awesome. I like it more then my 233 which I sold.
|
|
|
|
|
30 October 2014, 11:05 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United States
Posts: 27
|
The 104 fits the wrist better. Less cluttered dial, thinner, more accurate, less distortion when looking through the flatter crystal. I bumped the 233 all the time it seems. This does not occur with the 104.
|
|
|
|
|
30 October 2014, 11:10 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 324
|
Those are all fair and legitimate points (though unsure about the accuracy.. Suppose 104 has cosc cert). I did the opposite of what you did, letting go of the 104 for the 233
Last edited by arnage; 30 October 2014 at 11:11 AM.. Reason: autocorrect.. |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
