|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
23 November 2014, 01:11 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
|
GMT IIc or SubC Date
The itch has returned, and I've narrowed it down to these two. I like the GMT as I travel a lot and have international clients so the GMT feature would come in handy. The downside is the PCLs. I already have a SS Daytona so I might prefer a non-PCL watch to mix things up. The Sub might fit the bill as I spend a lot of time on the water. Not as sure about the square lugs though. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 01:23 PM
|
#2 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Gmt.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 01:26 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 128
|
GMT - just get the links brushed.
|
|
|
|
|
24 November 2014, 12:00 AM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 453
|
Quote:
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 November 2014, 12:14 AM
|
#5 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 37,966
|
I would go with the GMT, but I'm biased. I have an all black Y-series GMT-II that's been my favorite watch since I got it new over 10 years ago. I do a moderate amount of multi time zone travelling (less now that I'm retired than I did when I was working) and find the ability to quickly change the hours a very useful feature.
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 01:29 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: China
Watch: IWC IW389001
Posts: 762
|
For the square lugs concern, look to the SD4000.
I hesitated every time on the SubC. It's a great piece but my GMTIIC wins every time. If I could justify two so similar watches I would go for the Sub ND, as I like the symmetry, but when I saw the new SD4000 I suspected my GMTIIC was going to get flipped. It didn't and the GMTIIC stays. So my vote is the GMTIIC: Different from the classically recognised Rolex, the SubC. i ware mine on a black and green national for stealth and a fun change down. |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:12 PM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 440
|
I was in the same predicament 1 year ago, went to the AD planning to buy a Sub C date and walked out with a GMT, to me it looked flashier and I liked the extra complication. The last 2 pics are of the GMT 1 year later with daily wear, PCL's hold up fine, no one can see fine scratches unless your eye is pressed against the watch under a bright light, and can be polished to like new at service time. My daily wear is work and going out, not rugged outdoor stuff. Since you already have a dressier/flashier watch in the Daytona, I might go with the more rugged Sub. But since I'm a one Rolex guy, I'd go with the GMT.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 01:51 PM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
GMT and it's great with the PCL's
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:11 PM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
Sub. Glidelick is a game clincher.
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:14 PM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Shelly
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: 116520
Posts: 1,149
|
Get the sub bc I have one jk but all seriousness the sub is more rugged and although gmt feature is nice.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:19 PM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Sameer
Location: ON, Canada
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 718
|
I'm a sucker for the SubC.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:33 PM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,761
|
Thanks guys. I plan on trying them on tomorrow and picking one up. I'm really torn between the two. Part of me thinks I need a Sub back in the rotation (used to have a tt sub I wasn't feeling anymore) whereas the GMT would be something I've never owned before.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:36 PM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
I would go with what sings to you the most. I already own two subs so I would do gmt but that is just me
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:37 PM
|
#14 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NOR-CAL
Watch: Grail Daytona
Posts: 1,306
|
GMT2c.....100%
Best modern 40mm Rolex made, IMO. Next would be 42mm Exp2. And wouldn't you know it...both GMT's.
__________________
ROLEX:(116200)SS DATEJUST,(216570)SS EXPLORER II "POLAR",*(116518-0073)YG DAYTONA*,(116718)YG GMT MASTER IIc,(16610)SS SUBMARINER 50th LV,(16623)TT YACHT-MASTER ~BREITLING:SUPER OCEAN 44 ~JLC:NAVY SEALs ~OMEGA:PLANET OCEAN "LIQUIDMETAL LE" & (2201.51),SPEEEDMASTER PRO "METEORITE DIAL",SEAMASTER PRO GMT "GREAT WHITE" ~TUDOR:BLACK BAY(R) |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:38 PM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2006
Real Name: Bill
Location: Austin, Texas, US
Watch: GMT-IIC
Posts: 398
|
I love my GMT-IIC. Go for it! I used to travel quite a lot between time zones, and the convenience of the quick-set hour hands is a great reminder, at least twice every trip, of what a great watch it really is.
In addition, I had customers and colleagues in Japan and Europe. Quickly seeing their current time when I was about to hop on an international conference call was a pleasure with this watch. My current job has me mostly traveling within my time zone. I miss using the GMT functions! But it's still a fantastic watch, a stunner.
__________________
Bill 1984 DateJust 16013 2012 GMTII-C 116710LN 2013 Tudor Black Bay 79220R 2014 Milgauss 116400 Wife: 2015 Lady-Datejust 179160 |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:42 PM
|
#16 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
|
If you travel frequently
It's a no brainer - GMT. If you never travel beyond your time zone then the Sub is probably a reasonable bet.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:43 PM
|
#17 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
|
Both are such great choices!
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:47 PM
|
#18 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Earth
Watch: 116610
Posts: 3,455
|
I vote for the Sub.
__________________
NEVER ARGUE WITH AN IDIOT. FIRST THEY WILL DRAG YOU DOWN TO THEIR LEVEL. THEN, THEY WILL BEAT YOU WITH EXPERIENCE. 
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 02:49 PM
|
#19 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,207
|
SubC hands down for me personally. Had both twice and ended up with the SubC as my daily wearer. The glide lock clasp and brushed bracelet are must haves IMO, watch always looks brand new and you can't see scratches on it until you hold it up in the light and inspect it closely. I also prefer the look of the Sub. Just my two cents.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 03:06 PM
|
#20 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: LA CA
Posts: 34
|
Nothing beats the allure and sophistication of a freshly polished GMTIIC. Refined Masculinity....
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 03:14 PM
|
#21 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 118
|
GMT With Sub bracelet, or at least brushed bracelet. GMT has all the water resistance you'll ever need.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 03:50 PM
|
#22 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,852
|
Had both for the last year. The sub C was getting very little wrist time. GMT BLNR was getting all the Rolex time. I got rid of the sub and kept the GMT. Ended up trading the Sub on a Datejust. Both are very fine watches. I have ended up liking the PCL. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 05:07 PM
|
#23 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Sergio
Location: Miami, FL
Watch: Yes please!
Posts: 1,781
|
SubC
__________________
♛ 126610LV ♛ 16220 Salmon ♛ 126713GRNR ♛ 18238 Ω Speedmaster Moonwatch |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 05:28 PM
|
#24 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Emmanuel
Location: California, USA
Watch: submariner lv m
Posts: 764
|
Gmt
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 05:32 PM
|
#25 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
|
Gmt
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238 16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped) Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018 |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 05:44 PM
|
#26 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The garage
Watch: SMP
Posts: 145
|
GMT is the way to go, hands down.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 10:50 PM
|
#27 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
|
Am travelling now with my Submariner. I would definitely go the Submariner given the alternative you presented. It looks much better.
|
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 10:55 PM
|
#28 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
|
Go with the GMT and forget worrying about the PCL's.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 11:06 PM
|
#29 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,419
|
gmt
__________________
forever rolex |
|
|
|
|
23 November 2014, 11:29 PM
|
#30 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,536
|
How can one pick, two of the best
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
