The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 March 2015, 10:45 AM   #1
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Old diver inserts with lost pearl - thoughts?

I've debated this a lot over the years. One of the first things to go on a vintage diver bezel aka 5513, 1680, etc. is the pearl. We see a number of watches on sale with an empty hole where the pearl used to sit and we also see a bunch with a newer shiny white replacement that does not match the watch's overall patina. Also, it is possible to source a matching pearl or have one color-matched.

Which brings me to my question - how much do you obsess over having a perfect, matching pearl in your bezel? If you lost it, would you just roll with the empty hole? Thanks!
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2015, 10:53 AM   #2
samuelhuntington
"TRF" Member
 
samuelhuntington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: new hampshire
Watch: 5167, 16570, 5513
Posts: 493
You can find original ones with patina for around $100 usd. So if I had one fall out I would source a new one. It is a challenge to match patina without holding the pearl but they can be had.
samuelhuntington is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2015, 10:57 AM   #3
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Yes, I know you can get decent replacement options, but I guess I'm going for more of a visceral response about a tool watch. Presumably, when these old watches were new in the '60s or '70s (before they were such a niche collectable like now), the pearls would be compromised or lost and many divers would just keep using the watch with an empty hole in the bezel. I am interested to learn more about this to see how commonplace is the missing pearl.
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2015, 11:00 AM   #4
linesiders
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
linesiders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post
I am interested to learn more about this to see how commonplace is the missing pearl.
The pearls just crumble with old age, plus getting knocked about.

I am curious how many of these "Vintage Pearls" out there are really vintage and really Rolex.
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg!
linesiders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 March 2015, 01:05 PM   #5
oldLeatherNeck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Bay
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by linesiders View Post
The pearls just crumble with old age, plus getting knocked about.

I am curious how many of these "Vintage Pearls" out there are really vintage and really Rolex.


Yah, even VRFers are fooled.

I just shook my old head when seeing some chap selling a $3.00 chinese pearl shell filled with yellow color paint and sell them for 90 Euros, claiming it's genuine. He's at it for so freaking long, and apparently no one noticed. The bright yellow paint gives it away. I am willing to bet the PATINA will forever be that, doesn't matter how long you store it in the dark.

And if you're keen, these "Vintage Pearls" somehow are still full of "tritium" even after 40+ years. In the real genuine pearls, the tritium would have shrunken to about 1/2 of the original.

Well, a fool and his money will soon be parted
oldLeatherNeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2015, 11:51 AM   #6
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Which insert is more interesting to you?



Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2015, 02:08 PM   #7
oldLeatherNeck
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Bay
Posts: 158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric88 View Post
Which insert is more interesting to you?



First one is period correct for your watch. It's MK 3. The other, though faded, is a service thin font.
oldLeatherNeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2015, 03:43 PM   #8
omitohud
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldLeatherNeck View Post
First one is period correct for your watch. It's MK 3. The other, though faded, is a service thin font.

X2


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
omitohud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2015, 03:47 PM   #9
Vincent65
"TRF" Member
 
Vincent65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
Yes, the 1st one! ^^
__________________
https://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=80782&dateline=139659  8629
Vincent65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2015, 07:57 PM   #10
Eric88
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
Thanks for the comments! I knew the faded insert was a thin service font, but find its grey/blue fade attractive. It's nice to have options.
Eric88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.