ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
28 March 2015, 09:35 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Watch: No date Sub 14060M
Posts: 432
|
1680 red sub does this dial match the serial?
|
28 March 2015, 10:35 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 489
|
This is a MK 4 and from recent posts when I asked, 2.3 M is too early. Should be 2.45 M on.
|
28 March 2015, 10:38 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 489
|
As noted by others, please read the information in the link below:
http://rolex.watchprosite.com/show-f...ti-649211/s-0/ |
28 March 2015, 11:36 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Watch: No date Sub 14060M
Posts: 432
|
Yes I have read it and seen it is a mark iv
but I have seen several other mark iv's in that range. So thats why I ask Is there any more research that would up date the older thread? PS what about the service bezel do you think it takes to much away from value? |
28 March 2015, 09:38 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
What is the next digit on the serial, 2.3?,,, Anything is possible..
Also, what is the date stamp on the caseback? You can research the VRF Dial archive but anything in the 2.3 range is meters first. If you do a google search, there are documented watches in the 2.41 and 2.42 range with MK-4 dials.. Were they changed?! who knows.. if you like the watch and the price is right - go for it! |
28 March 2015, 10:09 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
|
Quote:
__________________
I have a weakness for Travel Watches, Platinum, Vintage Rolex and 1960s Divers |
|
28 March 2015, 10:27 PM | #7 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,736
|
Quote:
I have no bone in this fight... If you are happy with the watch and Dowling is your source...Zip-a-Dee...Dee pitty-Doo-Dah |
|
28 March 2015, 10:04 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
|
My red sub is a mark iv dial with a 2,36 serial number case.
Some are of the mind that the serial number is a bit too early for mark iv, but i know of many examples in this range, and usage of parts from the rolex parts bin was too imprecise to establish a certain line At worst, it is a service dial. My red sub is really gorgeous and the dial is pristine with great matching patina, similar to yours. If you like the watch, i'd say go for it.
__________________
I have a weakness for Travel Watches, Platinum, Vintage Rolex and 1960s Divers |
28 March 2015, 10:40 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Manila
Posts: 222
|
I had a MKIV dial in the past, complete set also 2.3XX. there are feet first samples in this serial number range as far as I know. also, if a dealer sold you a 2.3XX meant for a meters first, wouldn't he change the dial and add extra $$ to the profit?
|
28 March 2015, 11:37 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Watch: No date Sub 14060M
Posts: 432
|
Thank you for the input. I do like the watch and will probably go for it.
As long as the price is right of course. Now I am not sure what that price is, do to the serial- dial thing. any thoughts? |
29 March 2015, 05:53 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: "A"
Location: Bangkok
Watch: 5512/5513
Posts: 176
|
have seen a 2.41 MK4 so to start with 2.45 might not be entirely correct? am not sure though
|
29 March 2015, 07:36 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: USA
Watch: No date Sub 14060M
Posts: 432
|
I opened this one and it has a 1970 back.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.