ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
25 June 2015, 04:13 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Long Island
Watch: SS Sub Date, TT DJ
Posts: 703
|
Accuracy change/observation...
This is about accuracy so those "don't worry about a second or two a day" folks should go to the next thread...
Have had my Sub now since 2008. Had it serviced after a year and it has run, worn daily, approx +1.5 sec per day consistently. Got my DJ a little over a month ago and began a "new" alternate day, wearing pattern. I keep both watches running and set but now find with 50% less "wrist time" that the Sub gains only about 1/10 of a second per day. The next experiment would be to wear the DJ (runs approx. +1.5 sec. per day) only for a week or so and compare it in a daily wear/every other day test but have yet to do that. I direct this question to those who care... has anyone else noticed significant on wrist/off wrist accuracy variations? |
25 June 2015, 04:27 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Florida
Watch: 116713LN
Posts: 235
|
I purchased my GMTIIC two weeks ago, new, and is losing about 1 second per day. I don't take it off at night, but I am thinking about putting it on my night stand at night with the crown faced up to see if it evens out.
|
25 June 2015, 04:30 AM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: George
Location: USA
Watch: submariner
Posts: 99
|
Wind the watch 40x clockwise before going to bed and face the crown up
|
25 June 2015, 05:45 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Florida
Watch: 116713LN
Posts: 235
|
|
25 June 2015, 05:47 PM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
|
25 June 2015, 06:25 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Florida
Watch: 116713LN
Posts: 235
|
|
25 June 2015, 04:35 AM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
|
I do notice better accuracy with one of my Daytona's when it's worn daily vs. in rotation with the other one. So my experience is counter to yours.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
25 June 2015, 06:05 AM | #8 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,826
|
Quote:
|
|
25 June 2015, 11:06 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Long Island
Watch: SS Sub Date, TT DJ
Posts: 703
|
That's correct, thanks!
|
25 June 2015, 06:18 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
|
Depending on positioning I can create 4 second swings with my BLNR... when worn 24/7 it performs daily +1-2 SPD.
|
25 June 2015, 06:12 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,534
|
If I don't wear my Daytona its correct twice a day......
__________________
E |
25 June 2015, 06:28 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 671
|
My 16700 GMT is my daily wear. It was always a few seconds a day slow.
Did about 4 rounds of golf in Hawaii in March; and now it's consistently 2 seconds a day fast. Coincidence ? Not sure but that's the only thing i can think of that would have any effect on it. I had a few wrists snappers : ) Anyway i'm happy as it's better now than it was. I compare it to an atomic clock over a week or two...so my accuracy should be close and consistent.
__________________
- "M" 16600 Sea-Dweller - "A" GMT 16700. -“A” 16613LB Sub - 1680 Red Sub, Mark II, "Full Set" - 116660 DSSD D-Blue, 124060, 126613LN, 116710BLNR - 116500LN White Dial - “U” 16610 “SWISS” dial |
25 June 2015, 06:35 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Small city
Posts: 181
|
I found out that if you wear your watch daily and for at least 10hours. The watch must have full power reserve and the watch tends to run fast. Sometime up to 10s.
At night , place the crown up When left it on shelf for one day or more, power reserve dwindle, watch run slower significantly losing few seconds. |
26 June 2015, 01:51 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
I do think my watches behave a little differently if they're just laying around vs. being on the wrist. It seems that they usually run just a tiny bit slower most of the time...but position has an effect as well.
|
26 June 2015, 09:30 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Gary
Location: Oregon
Watch: 214270 216570
Posts: 707
|
From my limited experience, every watch, even with the same movement, will react differently to positional variation. My 216570 will gain about 1s/d on the wrist for 16 hours and lose about that if positioned vertically with 12 up overnight. It will gain more in all other positions. My 214270 will gain 1 to 2s/d during the day and will lose about 1s with crown up, and lose about 2s crown down. With both watches there is a 7s/d difference between the fastest and slowest position as measured on a timegrapher. You just have to experiment. But even then, so many other variables can affect accuracy day to day, so it's best to average over several days. Get to know the watch and then enjoy it.
|
26 June 2015, 12:53 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 813
|
Being more anal than most about accuracy, I've checked all five of my watches in six resting positions, and most tend to run slow with C^ and fast D^. If internal regulation is set close enough I can keep four of my five watches ±3 sec. or so indefinitely by positioning at night. That's not ±3 sec./day but within that tolerance for the long term. For example, the Tudor 79090 I'm now wearing was set 30 days ago and right now is at +1 sec. It's my most accurate watch, but all except the Daytona can be kept very close in this manner. The Daytona runs +5 sec/day on my wrist and fast in all positions, so it can't be self-regulated. I only wear it on special occasions, never more than a day at a time, so it doesn't really matter.
Every watch is a bit different and you'll need to put it on a Timegrapher or do manual testing to determine how each behaves.
__________________
GMT 1675 SS (1969) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79170 white-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Big Block Chrono 79180 black-dial panda (~1993) Tudor Sub 79090 (1992) |
26 June 2015, 01:57 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,354
|
Check out the watch tracker app for your smartphone if you haven't. Costs $5 but I really like the convenience and the hookup to the atomic clock.
__________________
"Appreciate your life!" |
26 June 2015, 06:21 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,063
|
There is one problem with all the so called accuracy checking it often develops into a OCD fixation then that OCD starts to take away the pleasure of owning and wearing a Rolex watch.For any watch to perform to or inside the COSC spec truly is quite a remarkable feat considering there are 86400 seconds in a day.All Mechanical watches are noticeably affected by the gravitational pull of the earth, it only takes a performance distortion of 1/1000th% for a mechanical watch movement to be one second less accurate in a day.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
26 June 2015, 09:35 PM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 226
|
Quote:
|
|
26 June 2015, 10:02 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
|
Quote:
Finally, my timing OCD waned and now just wear my watch 24/7 and reset to atomic time a couple of times a month... I guess my remaining OCD is I still don't let my watch get more than +/- 15 seconds from atomic time... tending to set me watch 10-15 seconds 'slow' when I do reset it which give me a solid 1/2 month before it approaches +15 seconds vs. atomic time. On one hand, while this OCD was a bit of a distraction, I now feel I have a more personal understanding of my specific watch because of my 'investment' in better understanding what made it tick. No regrets for me. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.