The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Watch Reviews (Non-Rolex)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 July 2015, 08:55 AM   #1
thsiao
"TRF" Member
 
thsiao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,248
Icon6 HANDS-ON REVIEW: IWC Pilot Chronograph (3777)

Please check out my hands-on review on the IWC Pilot Chronograph (3777) at Life of a WIS.

An honest review with many unique photos!

Direct link to review.





__________________
Instagram @lifeofawis
www.lifeofawis.com
thsiao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2015, 11:44 AM   #2
Urosfan
"TRF" Member
 
Urosfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,372
Nice
Urosfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 July 2015, 01:08 AM   #3
hchj
"TRF" Member
 
hchj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Singapore
Posts: 230
An enjoyable read, thanks! I still prefer its predecessor 3717. Dislike the 21mm lug width too.
hchj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 July 2015, 08:53 AM   #4
Mastergreenhand
"TRF" Member
 
Mastergreenhand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Tony
Location: Chi-town
Watch: Starbucks, Panerai
Posts: 1,188
Nice review and pics! Thanks for sharing. I am thinking of reacquiring one myself.
__________________
Starbucks, Speedmaster Professional, PAM 212
Mastergreenhand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 August 2015, 02:35 AM   #5
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Awesome watch...great review, too. Thanks!
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 December 2015, 03:48 PM   #6
Robertus2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Budapest/Hungary
Posts: 70
Nice watch and review! I still highly prefer the "classic" 3706 on Mk.I. bracelet... 3777 is way too large for most. Just my two cents of course.
Best,
Robert
Robertus2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 January 2016, 09:50 AM   #7
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
Very good! I left this message on your blog, as well:

An excellent write up, informative and well composed. I have two questions and one comment:

Both the movement and the features received relatively low 7 of 10 points. You say the accuracy since owned the watch has been spot on, so why the low rating? Not in house?

The features you list seem fairly complete, what is missing that you wouldn't rate it higher?

Finally, you give the strap, at 10 points, as much weight as the case or the dial or the movement;'and twice the weight as features or operation (5 points each). I don't think the strap deserves that much weight in the overall weighting. A bracelet perhaps.

Nonetheless, a good read and a really nice watch.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.