The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 September 2015, 06:58 AM   #1
hoot08
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: London
Posts: 28
nothing fits my small wrist + AD experience

Hi there,

My first proper post on here!

So i was on my lunch break at work yesterday and I decided to first Watches of Switerzland brand on Oxford Street (London) to try on some watches. I was impressed with the whole experience. The assistant was very knowledgeable and had a soft sell technique which i think is best with luxury stores.

However, I was so so desperate to try on the Gmt2c and Subc only to find that both these watches were just too large for my small wrists!!

Please suggest some sort of alternative which would be ideal for very small wrists. I am currently wearing an Omega AT 38.5mm which fits perfect. I think anything bigger than this is going to look out of place. Only option for me is possibly an Explorer 39mm or one of the datejust 1 range right?

Another route would be to get a larger watch and have it with a leather strap which usually gives a more snug look!

hope you can help

R
hoot08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:01 AM   #2
artschool
"TRF" Member
 
artschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,215
SD4000 wears smaller than a sub.
artschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:20 AM   #3
landroverking
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
Quote:
Originally Posted by artschool View Post
SD4000 wears smaller than a sub.
Yes it does.
How about the Exp 1 36mm or an Airking?
landroverking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:03 AM   #4
Rowlf
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 336
You could always check out the older Explorer (1270 or 114270 @ 36mm), or look for the smaller sized (now discontinued) Tudor Submariners.

Unfortunately neither route gets you the AD experience and warranty.

Cheers,

Ben
Rowlf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:27 AM   #5
stil
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: not stil
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex n Omega
Posts: 1,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowlf View Post
You could always check out the older Explorer (1270 or 114270 @ 36mm), or look for the smaller sized (now discontinued) Tudor Submariners.

Unfortunately neither route gets you the AD experience and warranty.

Cheers,

Ben
AD experience is overrated.
stil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 10:02 PM   #6
Sublovin
2024 Pledge Member
 
Sublovin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by stil View Post
AD experience is overrated.
I could not agree more!
Paying hundreds, maybe thousands more than necessary so that I get a little bage and maybe a free hat? Definitely not worth it to me...
Sublovin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:03 AM   #7
Globule
"TRF" Member
 
Globule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: G. L. O. Bule
Location: UK
Watch: out for snakes.
Posts: 271
I am amazed that the GMT (at 40mm) looks too big if your Omega (at 38.5mm) is just right. IMHO the GMT "wears" smaller than its size. I too have very small wrists but my GMT fits fine. I would suggest a 36mm DJ, but they appear to me to "wear" a tad larger than their size.
__________________
House guarded by Rottweiler three days a week ... guess which days.
Globule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:05 AM   #8
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
You might want to go back and ask them if they wouldn't mind sizing the braclet for you. This might make all the difference
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:11 AM   #9
Ravager135
"TRF" Member
 
Ravager135's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,224
40mm watches are supposed to wear "large" it's just that we've gotten bigger that now 40mm seems standard. If your wrists are that small, then perhaps the Explorer as you suggested or a Datejust would be a better fit. Truth be told, both watches have all you need in a Rolex anyway.
Ravager135 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:13 AM   #10
The Joker
"TRF" Member
 
The Joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
Get a DJ
The Joker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:25 AM   #11
hoot08
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: London
Posts: 28
super comments thank you!

I am considering going back to try the GMT2c on again shortly. I think the problem is the large long lugs which add height to the case. My omega AT's case isnt as big and I am pretty sure has shorter lugs too. :(

I can strongly recommend popping into an AD just for the experience. On the same day I went to the Omega boutique store (Oxford street) and that was even better, they offered me a drink on welcome and asked me to take a seat whilst my watch was getting resized and got to try on a few models via a sales guy.

Ofc I will not purchase from an AD again, didn't get enough discount as I wanted! I will be going Airport duty free shopping for Rolex's or grey resellers for any other brand in future.
hoot08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:36 AM   #12
Robbie68
"TRF" Member
 
Robbie68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NH
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 492
New Rose Gold Yachtmaster in 37mm.
Robbie68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:42 AM   #13
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
try dj or daytona. DD will look great too
zjd168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 08:07 AM   #14
J. Alan
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 529
It is amazing how the design of the bezel, case and composition, and the color of the dial will trick the eye into believing one watch is larger than the other when they are both the same size. I have an example in my own collection with a DJ and a DD, both being 36MM. When side by side, the DD appears larger. I have small wrists myself and the subs in my collection look large on me. IMO, 36MM models work the best for me.

I suggest experimenting with different colors and case designs at your local AD to see what works for you. I am sure you will find your "watch soul mate"!

J. Alan

P.S.: My 500th post!! HOOPLA!!!
J. Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:50 AM   #15
mjrchabot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: Rolex 116000, BB36
Posts: 147
Name:  uploadfromtaptalk1443304121236.jpg
Views: 2179
Size:  77.4 KBName:  uploadfromtaptalk1443304137721.jpg
Views: 2183
Size:  80.3 KB

Take a look at Rolex's 36-39mm line up. I have 6.25" wrists and this is the new red grape OP on my wrist. Fits like a glove. It's the same dimension as the Explorer 1 (39) so you could also consider that.
I also used to own a 14060 and it fit beautifully.
mjrchabot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 07:59 AM   #16
Bucky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Pics

Did you take some pics? I reckon the sub and gmt2c looks just fine. People worry to much about if the watch is to big or not. If you like it and are comfortable with the size i think that says it all. And every collection needs a Rolex sub or gmt in it.
Bucky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 10:39 AM   #17
OrangeSport
"TRF" Member
 
OrangeSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjrchabot View Post
Attachment 664486Attachment 664487

Take a look at Rolex's 36-39mm line up. I have 6.25" wrists and this is the new red grape OP on my wrist. Fits like a glove. It's the same dimension as the Explorer 1 (39) so you could also consider that.
I also used to own a 14060 and it fit beautifully.
Here's my 36

__________________
OrangeSport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2015, 03:23 AM   #18
JohnAndrew
"TRF" Member
 
JohnAndrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Florida Panhandle
Watch: 16800, 16803,79170
Posts: 1,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjrchabot View Post
Attachment 664486Attachment 664487

Take a look at Rolex's 36-39mm line up. I have 6.25" wrists and this is the new red grape OP on my wrist. Fits like a glove. It's the same dimension as the Explorer 1 (39) so you could also consider that.
I also used to own a 14060 and it fit beautifully.
Very nice!
JohnAndrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 08:00 AM   #19
Submariner2015
"TRF" Member
 
Submariner2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Watch: SubC Date
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoot08 View Post
Hi there,

My first proper post on here!

So i was on my lunch break at work yesterday and I decided to first Watches of Switerzland brand on Oxford Street (London) to try on some watches. I was impressed with the whole experience. The assistant was very knowledgeable and had a soft sell technique which i think is best with luxury stores.

However, I was so so desperate to try on the Gmt2c and Subc only to find that both these watches were just too large for my small wrists!!

Please suggest some sort of alternative which would be ideal for very small wrists. I am currently wearing an Omega AT 38.5mm which fits perfect. I think anything bigger than this is going to look out of place. Only option for me is possibly an Explorer 39mm or one of the datejust 1 range right?

Another route would be to get a larger watch and have it with a leather strap which usually gives a more snug look!

hope you can help

R
How about a Daytona...they list as 40mm but are closer (at least in appearance) to 39mm--the ss black dialed Daytona is a beauty imo
Submariner2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 08:12 AM   #20
1AP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: The North
Posts: 264
Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner2015 View Post


How about a Daytona...they list as 40mm but are closer (at least in appearance) to 39mm--the ss black dialed Daytona is a beauty imo
Daytona in SS is 38.5mm. In PM its 39.1. So yea try out a daytona. Oyster perpetual 39mm is also beautiful.

1AP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 08:02 AM   #21
cht
2024 Pledge Member
 
cht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
How small/big is your wrist?

The 39mm explorer wears pretty big due to the big dial and thin bezel.

I'd rec looking at second hand dealers for a classic 40mm sub or the 36mm explorer I 114720

my wrist is pretty small at 6.5" but I think the 40mm case still works well.
good luck!

cht is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 09:40 AM   #22
hoot08
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: London
Posts: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by cht View Post
How small/big is your wrist?

The 39mm explorer wears pretty big due to the big dial and thin bezel.

I'd rec looking at second hand dealers for a classic 40mm sub or the 36mm explorer I 114720

my wrist is pretty small at 6.5" but I think the 40mm case still works well.
good luck!


Just measured - 6 inches ish.

well a little over 6 but with a tight tape fit id say 6 inches yeah. :(
hoot08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 11:54 AM   #23
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoot08 View Post
Just measured - 6 inches ish.

well a little over 6 but with a tight tape fit id say 6 inches yeah. :(
That should be no problem to carry whatever watch you want. Any modern rolex with the EZ link or glide lock clasp can be easily sized to fit you. And look and feel great.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 06:52 PM   #24
DaytonaOriginal
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by cht View Post
How small/big is your wrist?

The 39mm explorer wears pretty big due to the big dial and thin bezel.

I'd rec looking at second hand dealers for a classic 40mm sub or the 36mm explorer I 114720

my wrist is pretty small at 6.5" but I think the 40mm case still works well.
good luck!

If your biceps would be smaller I personally would find the watch a bit too big, but now somehow the balance is there.......just my opinion.
DaytonaOriginal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 08:08 AM   #25
GTS Dean
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,016
You're either going to need a 36mm size, or a 40mm with a low bezel, like a Daytona or old stock Explorer II. If the Oyster bracelet won't size correctly, you will need to go to a strap, or 36mm Day-Date on President bracelet.
__________________
TT OysterQuartz, SS/Black "U" Daytona, TT GMT II-C, DD OysterQuartz, Breitling Aerospace, Omega Speedmaster Pro
GTS Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 08:38 AM   #26
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Daytona is a good idea, wears smaller than the Subc. Look on chrono24 for dealers so you can try them on.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 10:01 AM   #27
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,092
I have a similar size wrist, wear a Daytona without a problem. I have had numerous Subs which fit fine as well. The only Rolex I felt that was a little too big for my wrist was a 216570.

I think once you decide on a watch and wear it for a while you will get used to the size.
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 10:08 AM   #28
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
Older GMT and subs wear smaller with their lugs, do you need new. Certainly lots of room with Oyster perpetuals and Explorers if you don't need a big bezel on the watch, Daytona also wears a bit smaller and flatter, which is often a big part of the visual perception.

37mm Royal Oak AP and even a 40mm Aquanaut will all sit well I expect.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 10:14 AM   #29
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Another vote for the Daytona or the 39mm Oyster. Seems to be around the sweet spot for your wrist.
Muzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 10:16 AM   #30
acaixguard
"TRF" Member
 
acaixguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex, AP, ALS
Posts: 401
Try the Sea-Dweller 4000. And if you go with it, have the diver's extension removed. It's a watch that wears well on many wrist sizes.
acaixguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.