|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
13 November 2015, 11:48 AM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 42
|
I can't get enough of this watch
Ahem...however I'm thinking of my next move...I have access to a 1680 in the same condition...or should I go GMT?
|
|
|
|
13 November 2015, 11:55 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: David
Location: Sydney
Watch: Daytona & Sub C
Posts: 206
|
Pepsi GMT would be my vote. The splash of colour is awesome
|
|
|
|
|
13 November 2015, 12:06 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
Red or white 1680? However, it would seem that you get more bang for you buck on a 1675. Or white 1680 and 1675 for the price of some Red 1680's!
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin Member No. 922 |
|
|
|
|
13 November 2015, 12:13 PM
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 42
|
Sorry I should have clarified white 1680
|
|
|
|
|
13 November 2015, 01:25 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
Get both. They seem to hold their values if the dials are correct
|
|
|
|
|
13 November 2015, 05:14 PM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 266
|
Stickin' with the four digits, huh?
|
|
|
|
|
16 November 2015, 02:26 AM
|
#7 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: san francisco
Posts: 27
|
id stick with what you got!
|
|
|
|
|
16 November 2015, 08:00 AM
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 42
|
That's what I meant
In addition to the 5512 not to replace it |
|
|
|
|
16 November 2015, 08:17 AM
|
#9 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
Coke gmt
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich |
|
|
|
|
16 November 2015, 08:22 AM
|
#10 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
1675 Pepsi especially with a hint of fade really looks well and makes for a nice change from a Sub. That said, 1680 Sub is also very nice indeed - can't go wrong with either!
|
|
|
|
|
16 November 2015, 09:12 AM
|
#11 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: London UK
Watch: Daytona,GMT's,1680
Posts: 283
|
You're asking the question so I guess you'll have to get both.
|
|
|
|
|
16 November 2015, 08:58 AM
|
#12 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,601
|
That's a beauty.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
16 November 2015, 09:16 AM
|
#13 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
I'd go with the 1680 but have I believe a tropic 19 crystal installed (no cyclops)...I love that look
|
|
|
|
|
16 November 2015, 11:54 AM
|
#14 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: David
Location: Dallas, Tx
Watch: Divers
Posts: 323
|
go for a 1675 first
__________________
Rolex 1665, 1675, 1680, 5513, 16600, 16610, 14060
|
|
|
|
|
20 November 2015, 04:45 AM
|
#15 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wayne
Watch: Rolex 5512
Posts: 142
|
I've got a 1675 and a 1680...I think that the size of the GMT (mine is a 1.7M) seems a bit smaller than the 1680. That is probably because of the top hat crystal. Both are great watches with lots of history....I think that the GMT is more versatile (pepsi or black bezel), but the Sub (in my opinion) looks better on a nato than the GMT does. As many have said, you won't go wrong with either!!!
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
