ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 December 2015, 10:53 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/Rolex/PAM
Posts: 617
|
Considering a different AP
I would really appreciate some input from the AP experts on here.
I currently have a steel diver in my collection (picture below), but it has not really been a great piece for me. It's my first and only AP. I don't want to give up on AP, so I am considering a Safari (26470), Ceramic Diver (15707), or Ceramic 44mm (26400). The challenge is that I have a 6.5" wrist and the diver feels a little top heavy. I have considered moving to the smaller strap size, and may do that with my next piece. For those that perhaps started with a diver, did any of the above provide you with a better AP experience? I am leaning towards the Safari, and would value any thoughts you may have. Thank you! |
30 December 2015, 11:19 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
In terms of wearability, Ceramic Diver is an improvement over SS as it's lighter so feels more comfortable. But it's the same size. 44mm is bigger. If weight is a big issue, try out the FC ROOs. They are the lightest.
If size bothers you more, take a look at the Royal Oak range. |
30 December 2015, 11:40 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/Rolex/PAM
Posts: 617
|
Quote:
|
|
30 December 2015, 11:54 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
Quote:
beautiful watch btw. |
|
31 December 2015, 12:39 PM | #5 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,637
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think you're better off with a ceramic to reduce weight, 42 or 44. I love the look and light weight of AP FC, and originally was going to get a FC Diver. But I happened to try the FC 44 chrono, and it sat better on my wrist (~6.5") than the Diver, not moving around as much. It appears to me that the lugs on the 44's are angled downward (more perpendicular to the plane of the case/dial) more than on the 42's, so seem to hold the watch in a better position on my wrist. You'll have to try one on your wrist to see if that has the same effect on you. |
||
30 December 2015, 11:47 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
|
It’d be a cheaper exercise to simply opt for the XS strap first, rather than ditching the 703 for the 707, and adding the strap then.
If it doesn’t help, then at least you’ll already have the strap for when the ceramic diver arrives. I highly doubt the Safari and ROOC, even in ceramic, will suit a 6½” wrist any better than the divers do. |
30 December 2015, 11:51 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 1,339
|
The shorter strap will likely help, I added one to my 44RG and it made a world of a difference. Given your wrist size, any of the pieces you mentioned should work. I would look at your lifestyle and what role this AP will fill for you in your collection. Is it going to be just a weekend watch or a daily, etc. Based on that, will be easier for you to decide but all three that you mentioned are great in their own respect.
|
30 December 2015, 11:55 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
Not sure the Safari will help as the strap is thinner than the Diver's so it feels even more top heavy. I would also look at a ROC, alot slimmer yet wears like a 43mm.
|
31 December 2015, 12:08 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
|
44mm you pick the flavor.
|
31 December 2015, 12:28 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
|
This. It wears a lot more balanced than the Diver.
PS, Diver looks great in the picture above!
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat???? |
31 December 2015, 01:49 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,231
|
i hate to say it but AP simply does not wear well on smaller wrists...maybe try the smaller royal oak as the offshores are all 42 and 44mm..
the 42mm wears like 44 and the 44 wears like 46 |
31 December 2015, 01:55 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Dominik
Location: Zürich
Watch: Rolex, Patek, FPJ
Posts: 381
|
Problem with AP is that they wear large. Seems to me that the 42 ROC wears almost like a 44 Panerai.
|
31 December 2015, 03:39 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/Rolex/PAM
Posts: 617
|
Thanks so much everyone for all the helpful replies!
|
31 December 2015, 10:42 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Watch Dealer atm!
Watch: all
Posts: 2,800
|
i disagree with those saying 44 is the same fit..if you have small wrists like me the 44mm wears significantly differently to the 42
__________________
|
31 December 2015, 11:40 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indiana
Watch: PP/AP/Rolex/PAM
Posts: 617
|
|
31 December 2015, 12:26 PM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
|
I would shoot for a 15202 or a 15707c if the weight is your only concern.
I loved everything about the diver c comfort wise, but I missed the subtle look of the WG screws against the SS case. The SS screws are much more prominent against the ceramic case in most lighting (real life not the best of TRF shot collection ). |
31 December 2015, 12:33 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All of them
Posts: 231
|
I have the titanium ROO grey themes on a bracelet and I absolutely love it. I love the weight of the watch. I can wear it all day and never get "watch fatigue." Pictures don't do it justice, you should try one on in person if you have the chance I think you will be very pleased..... BTW, I also have 6.5 inch wrist.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.