ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mrchrisx69 · 6 March 2016, 02:50 AM

Thoughts?

Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

Boothroyd · 6 March 2016, 02:52 AM

Not in my case. Tudor Black Bay covers that angle for me.

rhstranger · 7 March 2016, 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boothroyd

not in my case. Tudor black bay covers that angle for me.

+1

Gerardus · 6 March 2016, 02:53 AM

yes.

BNA/LION · 6 March 2016, 02:53 AM

Yes

Danny83 · 6 March 2016, 02:56 AM

Yup everybody needs a Sub

Easy Rhino · 6 March 2016, 02:56 AM

Yes

MickCollins1916 · 6 March 2016, 02:56 AM

Maybe not a must...but I really like my subs. 👍

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Moggo · 6 March 2016, 02:57 AM

My 1st Rolex.......so yes :)

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Micha · 6 March 2016, 02:59 AM

SD for me...

less common

rmlovett1 · 6 March 2016, 02:59 AM

Definitely!

sickened1 · 6 March 2016, 03:00 AM

Another yes here.

How can you not have an iconic watch included in your collection.

GordonC · 6 March 2016, 03:09 AM

Absolutely, yes, I needed a Sub!

I got the Daytona first, but the Hulk was high on the list for next watch. After I got PADI dive certified last year, then a dive watch became top of the list. Got on the Hulk waiting list at my AD last September, watch came in December and I bought it. I've worn it non-stop since then!

Ruud Van Driver · 6 March 2016, 03:10 AM

Having a Sub is compulsory. It's the law!

Rags · 6 March 2016, 05:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ruud Van Driver

Having a Sub is compulsory. It's the law!

I fully concur. It's a must have.

Rick_Nashville · 6 March 2016, 03:45 AM

IMO, the Sub is one of the most classically beautiful and visually appealing designs in all of horology. As such, I consider it to be an absolutely essential sports watch. Here's my quartet.

1680..

116613LN

116613LB

116619LB

Regards, -Rick.

capote · 6 March 2016, 02:59 AM

No, I don't dive

kilyung · 6 March 2016, 03:00 AM

It was for me.

tmehanna · 6 March 2016, 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

It was for me.

Are you serious? Blue YG AND WG? They are both classic and great looking watches but come on!!

subtona · 6 March 2016, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

It was for me.

Nice Mike

It's an absolute for me.

threemonkeys · 6 March 2016, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

It was for me.

I need me one of those drooling emoticons right about now.

Gryfalcon · 6 March 2016, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kilyung

It was for me.

^^^ it's an essential

Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk

here's mine

polaris72 · 6 March 2016, 03:07 AM

I would say yes.

SearChart · 6 March 2016, 03:07 AM

Not a must but I sure want one.

madmax21 · 6 March 2016, 03:08 AM

I don't think a collection is defined by what pieces are in rather by pieces that matter to you

Seaswirl · 6 March 2016, 03:09 AM

Yes for me. It is the quintessential sport watch and, in my opinion, the most iconic Rolex.

toneafficianado · 6 March 2016, 03:12 AM

Yes , definitely. Subs 4ever!

SemperFi · 6 March 2016, 03:16 AM

Not for me. I have an Explorer 39mm and hope to add a Black Bay Black later in the year. That will nicely fill in the diver category and I happen to like it better than the Sub.

doramas · 6 March 2016, 03:20 AM

No.

others prefer Rolex.
The have many people

Spoonage · 6 March 2016, 03:24 AM

I will say yes since I have a SubC, a vintage Tudor Sub, and a BBN. I'm dive watch friendly.

6 March 2016, 02:50 AM	#1
mrchrisx69 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: San Diego Posts: 189	Is the Submariner a must for your collection? Thoughts? Sent from my SM-G920P using Tapatalk

6 March 2016, 02:52 AM	#2
Boothroyd 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Daniel Location: Minneapolis, MN Watch: Wilsdorf(s) Posts: 10,259	Not in my case. Tudor Black Bay covers that angle for me. __________________ Explorer 214270 MK I/Datejust II Black 116300/Tudor Heritage Black Bay Black 79220N

6 March 2016, 02:53 AM	#4
Gerardus "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Real Name: Gerardus Location: often in the air Watch: ♕ Posts: 12,147	yes. __________________ ♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300

6 March 2016, 02:53 AM	#5
BNA/LION 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Larry Location: San Diego, CA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 25,661	Yes __________________ ✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.

6 March 2016, 02:59 AM	#10
Micha "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Michael Location: S.Florida/Ontario Watch: 6263, 1675 Posts: 2,259	SD for me... less common __________________ life is good

6 March 2016, 02:56 AM	#6
Danny83 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Real Name: Danny Location: Bay Area CA Watch: Yellow Gold Posts: 20,314	Yup everybody needs a Sub

6 March 2016, 02:56 AM	#7
Easy Rhino "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Kevin Location: Now Tennessee Watch: 2-Line Sub & DJ41 Posts: 414	Yes

6 March 2016, 02:56 AM	#8
MickCollins1916 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Real Name: Bill Location: Baltimore, MD Watch: 116600 SD4K Posts: 3,286	Maybe not a must...but I really like my subs. 👍 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 March 2016, 02:57 AM	#9
Moggo "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Wales Watch: 16610, SD4K, Exp 1 Posts: 1,098	My 1st Rolex.......so yes :) Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

6 March 2016, 02:59 AM	#11
rmlovett1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Richard Location: GA Watch: YTBD Posts: 23,512	Definitely!

6 March 2016, 03:00 AM	#12
sickened1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Ed Location: SoCal Watch: ugiveiswatchuget Posts: 9,054	Another yes here. How can you not have an iconic watch included in your collection.

6 March 2016, 03:09 AM	#13
GordonC "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Gordon Location: Calgary AB Canada Watch: Daytona TT Panda Posts: 145	Absolutely, yes, I needed a Sub! I got the Daytona first, but the Hulk was high on the list for next watch. After I got PADI dive certified last year, then a dive watch became top of the list. Got on the Hulk waiting list at my AD last September, watch came in December and I bought it. I've worn it non-stop since then! __________________ 116523 Daytona TT Panda 116610LV Submariner C Hulk

6 March 2016, 03:10 AM	#14
Ruud Van Driver "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Real Name: Chopped Liver Location: S. Wales Valleys Watch: Mickey Mouse Posts: 9,926	Having a Sub is compulsory. It's the law! __________________ 116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 *"Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott* Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

6 March 2016, 03:45 AM	#16
Rick_Nashville 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: USA Posts: 1,485	IMO, the Sub is one of the most classically beautiful and visually appealing designs in all of horology. As such, I consider it to be an absolutely essential sports watch. Here's my quartet. 1680.. 116613LN 116613LB 116619LB Regards, -Rick.

6 March 2016, 02:59 AM	#17
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	No, I don't dive

6 March 2016, 03:00 AM	#18
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	It was for me.

6 March 2016, 03:07 AM	#23
polaris72 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: U.S./Vienna, AT Posts: 1,967	I would say yes.

6 March 2016, 03:08 AM	#25
madmax21 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Toronto Canada Watch: GMT Master ll Posts: 1,036	I don't think a collection is defined by what pieces are in rather by pieces that matter to you

6 March 2016, 03:09 AM	#26
Seaswirl "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2014 Location: NYC Posts: 1,761	Yes for me. It is the quintessential sport watch and, in my opinion, the most iconic Rolex.

6 March 2016, 03:12 AM	#27
toneafficianado 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Alan Location: Australia Posts: 2,204	Yes , definitely. Subs 4ever!

6 March 2016, 03:16 AM	#28
SemperFi "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Real Name: Angelo Location: Brooklyn, NY Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 42,164	Not for me. I have an Explorer 39mm and hope to add a Black Bay Black later in the year. That will nicely fill in the diver category and I happen to like it better than the Sub.

6 March 2016, 03:20 AM	#29
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	No. others prefer Rolex. The have many people

6 March 2016, 03:24 AM	#30
Spoonage 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Location: California Posts: 3,133	I will say yes since I have a SubC, a vintage Tudor Sub, and a BBN. I'm dive watch friendly.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode