ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
28 July 2008, 06:22 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
|
The SUV-ification of watches
Ok, today I was walking around Union Square in SF, and saw a young man wearing a HUGE watch.
At Shreve, a thin woman was trying on a gi-normous Panerai. I'm guessing the watch face was bigger than her knee. I don't get the big watch thing at all. Here's a really bad pic taken with my phone camera. |
28 July 2008, 06:31 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Wolfgang
Location: New Jersey.
Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega
Posts: 5,592
|
I'm a big guy and I don't get it. Anything over 40MM is too big IMO. Unless I wanted a hockey-puck or tuna-can on my wrist.
|
28 July 2008, 06:43 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Jordan
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT Master II C
Posts: 418
|
The new large faced watch trend is beyond me.
And I am only 26.
__________________
116710 GMT Master II Ceramic Black Bezel M Serial (HAVE) 16710 GMT Master II Coke (HAD) 16622 Yacht-Master Platinum / SS (WANT) 116509 Daytona WG Meteorite (GRAIL)
|
28 July 2008, 09:38 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
If you look at history, I wouldn't call this a new concept or trend. The 50's, 60's & 70's had many examples from numerous watch makers that routinely saw cases being made 44mm and beyond. I don't get it when people state this is a 'new trend'. Check out some vintage watch sellers and you'll see what I'm talking about. I will say that 50mm+ watches are ridiculous IMO and those do seem to be on the rise, but all too often I see people clumping 42mm, 44mm & 46mm designs into the "New Trend, Too Big" category which I don't think is fair.
I do believe this mentality is more prevalent on the Rolex forums because 40mm has been the largest case Rolex ever made for the last 50+ years and only recently decided to go beyond that size...it stands to reason the majority of Rolex owners will in turn believe 40mm is the perfect size. Personally, I love many 44-47mm designs that look amazing in the flesh. |
28 July 2008, 10:04 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 47
|
I think that in 10 years or so, the really big watches will look as stupid as really wide neck ties.
|
28 July 2008, 10:09 AM | #6 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: John
Location: ɹǝpun
Watch: and learn
Posts: 2,986
|
Quote:
Most of the really big watches are relatively cheap, won't be running in 10 years.
__________________
Obey Gravity, it's the Law! ROLEX --- SEIKO --- HEUER TRF REHAUT T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M T H E R O L E X F O R U M |
|
28 July 2008, 12:59 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
Who here can really say what will prevail as "fashion" and what will pass. Wonder what the pocket watch owners said at the advent of wrist models.
The reality is these makers do market research and are opting to go at least a bit bigger. Would you buy a 36mm DD today? Not me. Maybe that's why the DD-II is 41mm. |
28 July 2008, 06:44 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
|
I also think it looks ridiculous
|
29 July 2008, 12:13 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Brad
Location: NC
Watch: Any Rolex
Posts: 378
|
__________________
Wearing a Rolex is perpetual bliss! |
28 July 2008, 06:53 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mr. Taco
Location: Right Behind You.
Posts: 913
|
I am 6'4" 200lbs and have 8.5 inch wrists. I wear a 44mm watch most days and it only looks big on other people.
|
28 July 2008, 07:09 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,513
|
My take on watch size...
Both large and small are good. The design is what makes the difference. I love my 40mm SD - perfect proportions! I also love my 47mm and 44mm Panerai, not because they are large, but because the design calls for a watch of this size. Large for the sake of large is not good.
cheers greg in denver |
28 July 2008, 08:08 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Cambridge Ma
Posts: 2,331
|
Well as the American obesity epidemic increases diabetes increases, with attendant eyesight problems, so the BIG watch fashion may be evolutionary. They look better on bigger wrists and the bigger dial is easier to see.......
__________________
Yunnoworameenmiduck |
28 July 2008, 08:20 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
|
Live and let live...people wear worse things than oversized watches.
__________________
__________________ |
28 July 2008, 08:37 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
I draw the " personal" line at 44MM, but 40 is fine. It's about a lot more than just gross dimensions too, shape and thickness impact the "look" too. A slim Panny at 44 isn't that strange.
|
28 July 2008, 08:47 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: your 6.
Posts: 388
|
Maybe we can blame this guy:
__________________
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Dr. Richard P. Feynman, Rogers Commission Report, Appendix F, 9 June 1986 |
28 July 2008, 08:57 AM | #16 |
1,000,000th PostMember
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
|
__________________
GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN |
29 July 2008, 03:52 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Ashutosh
Location: Rochester NY
Watch: Daytonas,SD
Posts: 2,342
|
__________________
Everything becomes nothing after ROLEX 116520 SS Daytona White Dial 116520 SS Daytona Black Dial 116523 18K&SS Daytona Slate Dial 16600 Sea-Dweller 16710 GMT Master II Pepsi Bezel 16613 18K&SS Submariner Blue Dial 116660 Deepsea Sea-Dweller |
28 July 2008, 05:07 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
I think it's a fad but who knows. Rolex has increased the size of their watches. Maybe it's here to stay. All the other watch companies are doing it. I'm happy with my 40MM Rollies.
__________________
Ron |
28 July 2008, 05:25 PM | #19 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Nothing wrong with the PERFECT 40 mm, I say, guys!!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 July 2008, 06:25 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
...nothing wrong as long as you add about 2-4mm to that figure. Maybe I'll split that figure and add only 3mm as a happy compromise. 43mm case...interesting...I wonder where I could find the true PERFECT size in a watch?
|
29 July 2008, 02:44 AM | #21 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OC
Posts: 69
|
don't bash it 'till you try it
40 seems perfect now because you haven't found a 44 you like.
Once you find a 44 you love, then your 36 and 40 will look too small. |
28 July 2008, 09:10 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
SUV-ification of watches. Good one.
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
28 July 2008, 09:17 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
|
|
28 July 2008, 09:26 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Metro - Detroit
Posts: 36
|
I think this trend of larger watches was popularized by Jacob. This 47mm case watch was the rage a couple of years back.
|
28 July 2008, 02:13 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Lee
Location: Malaysia
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,534
|
In this world of increasing dependence on IT, more and more people are spending much of their working and recreational time (TRF members take note!) staring at a monitor. Eyesight is deteriorating in the mass population and larger watches are becoming more popular.
I for one am spending more time outdoors doing stuff, and I find that with my active lifestyle, my Explorer II with it's puny minuscule dial more than suits my needs, even though I'm a four-eyed monster. |
28 July 2008, 03:02 PM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: greg
Location: Tempe AZ
Watch: GMT
Posts: 5,703
|
Im not small at 6'3 and 275 with 7.5 inch wrist....I wear a DJ and look fine...
I have never banged it into anything like I do with Breitlings, 44mm and up to me 40mm is perfect size |
28 July 2008, 04:22 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 77
|
40mm is just too small and after you wear something 42, 43, 44, 47mm and get used to it, it makes 40 mm seem like 30mm... 40 mm is the standard, but like it has been said, all brands are making bigger watches, from Patek to Swatch. I think 40mm will be a thing of the past for many watch brands, and I think Rolex is starting to realize that too. When I see a 40mm on some bigger guys, it just looks funny
|
29 July 2008, 03:32 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
|
I like having various choices, but I think some people go overboard on picking a watch that is too big for them. I love the 44mm Lum's from Panerai, but I can't pull them off. Just looks goofy on me. Somehow, the 45mm Rad's look fine. They sit much thinner.
__________________
member#3242 |
29 July 2008, 03:45 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
40mm is max for me. Even the 42mm PO seems too large for my wrists.
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
29 July 2008, 09:40 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 186
|
Quite the debate here. I have been a Rolex person for over 20 years and I guess I am also a traditionalist. Although there is a place in the market for high end big watches, I hope Rolex does not jump into that market. In my opinion Rolex is about tradition and slow evolution of their watches. I wonder if generally this is a younger vs older person issue meaning younger wants watches that are larger and currently more fashionable and older likes traditional models and sizes.
__________________
"There are only two types of people in this world, those who like Neil Diamond and those who don't". Bob Wiley 16030A, 16013, 116520 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.