ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 July 2008, 09:16 AM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 105
|
Questions about GMT 16710
I plan to buy GMT II 16710 from local preowned watch seller. He has A serie and X serie, both coke bezel and both complete with box and paper. Watch condition is quite similiar, say 90%. He is also asking for same price.
1. Somebody told me that I should take the X serie. He said for the same condition, an older watch should value more. Is this true? 2. If I want to know, originally this watch came with what kind of bezel, how to check? Thanks |
30 July 2008, 09:26 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
The X series will be tritium. A series probably luminova. I'd go for tritium, but that's just me. I can always get a luminova watch.
|
30 July 2008, 11:05 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: SF BAY AREA CA
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 3,047
|
I agree!! Love the T<25~!
__________________
Rolex Blue TT Submariner (95) Rolex SS GMT IIc (08) Rolex GMT II 16710 COKE (08 for me..) Rolex Explorer II Blk (91) Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (07) Panerai 104 & 177ti ( 04/03) |
30 July 2008, 12:17 PM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 105
|
When I checked the paper, the X serie purchased in 1991 and the A serie purchased in 2001. Both not SEL. The diffirence is 10 years, but the condition is really similiar.
To get the 'originality', is there any code in the paper to get an idea that it should come with what kind of bezel in the first place? When I asked the seller why for the same watch, same condition, but 10 years older you sell at the same price, he said we sell the watch not the year......... what an answer! |
30 July 2008, 12:21 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
|
30 July 2008, 09:32 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
|
There's your answer, straight from the Man.
__________________
Buz The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis |
30 July 2008, 10:21 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,514
|
I would usually advise that, barring hard to get models, you get the latest model you can for the same money... but there are exceptions.. as Mike says, this may be one of those.
An early "A" might be from 1997 and also be tritium, so I would look at this if it is important to you. However, an "X" is from 1991.. One is 10 years old, and one almost 20. I would ensure they are both period correct, such as no hand or dial replacement..good color, bracelet integrity, etc...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
30 July 2008, 10:39 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Scott
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: your 6.
Posts: 388
|
I bought a pre-loved late "A" series GMT-Master II in March of this year. The SN is A89XXXX and it has the solid end links, luminova, and lug holes. The watch was sold by the AD in February of 2001. I prefer the luminova because it still glows. I have read that eventually the tritium deteriorates, loosens, and Rolex prefers to replace the dial and hands so that pieces of it don't get in the works. The "A" series 16710 may have the solid end links, which most people prefer. The "X" series 16710 certainly will not. I don't know that there is an advantage to owning an older version of the same reference watch, unless you are a collector who really wants the tritium dial.
__________________
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled." Dr. Richard P. Feynman, Rogers Commission Report, Appendix F, 9 June 1986 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.