ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
11 May 2016, 09:37 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
OP 39mm or Explorer 1 36mm (NOS) - opinions?
I've just been looking online at the rhodium 39mm OP, which I think is stunning... but it occurred to me that I could probably get a new old stock 114270 for about the same money. Lo and behold, Chrono24 has just the thing, available for delivery from Italy to the UK.
I'd love to have both, but that's absolutely not an option, so I'm just pondering which I would choose. Which would you choose, and why? I'd be interested to hear of any experiences of buying via Chrono24 from sellers in another country too. Thanks ladies and gents
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
11 May 2016, 09:49 PM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
|
If it's really NOS with stickers, then you'll probably be paying a lot more than for a 114270 in mint condition (which would be my choice). How much is it?
|
11 May 2016, 10:40 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Quote:
http://www.chrono24.co.uk/rolex/expl...-id3015412.htm I'd be happy to have mint, as long as it really is mint with no discernible bracelet stretch. As I just posted in another thread, there's also the BB36 to consider (available in July for closer to £1.5k, after discount) and the Tudor Style (a fair chunk less than that). The OP 39mm is perhaps just too similar to my 214270 - same everything but dial, hands and clasp. At least the 114270 will feel obviously like a different watch... but worth double the BB36? Maybe I think too much.
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
|
11 May 2016, 10:57 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
have you considered the new 214270 explorer 1 39mm which will be available at authorized dealers within the next couple of months? I owned the first gen 214270 and the majority seem to prefer the new changes.
|
11 May 2016, 11:27 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
If I had crazy amounts of money, I'd buy the 2nd gen as well as the 114270, to go with my 1st gen 214270. Unfortunately, however, I do not...
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
11 May 2016, 11:05 PM | #6 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
|
Quote:
|
|
11 May 2016, 11:36 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Quote:
In any case, if no import duties would be due, that may open up a few possibilities.
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
|
11 May 2016, 11:50 PM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Chrono24 can be a minefield. Tread lightly
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
11 May 2016, 11:57 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Thanks for the warning, Joe
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
12 May 2016, 12:00 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 24
|
While I know the trend of big watches is slowly dying, 36mm is still too small for me. I'm a big guy though. That's said the 39mm OP I picked up yesterday is awesome. The most simple design I've ever seen on a modern Rolex and just beautiful.
|
12 May 2016, 12:49 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
The 36mm explorer wears quite small with its domed bezel. Make sure you try one on in person. I think the 39mm OP's are amazing.
|
12 May 2016, 01:18 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
The 114270 wears fine, but if the 114300 is in play, no brainer
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
17 May 2016, 03:59 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
I've been pondering and weighing up my options. And right now... I'm feeling most strongly about the 114270. I've wanted one for 5 years and having worn my black dial 16570 today, I'm so charmed by the "tin" bracelet and clasp I think I'd be very happy with the Explorer. The challenge is where to find just what I'm after (mint, no discernable bracelet stretch with engraved rehaut), at a price I'm happy with.
If you know of any available, please do let me know. Thanks Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
17 May 2016, 04:09 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: northern CA USA
Watch: 114270 Explorer
Posts: 479
|
Sounds good red.earth. If your wrist size is 6.75" (like mine) or smaller, the 114270 will be perfect. A classic in my opinion, still at fair prices.
|
17 May 2016, 04:10 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Explorer 1 36mm
|
17 May 2016, 04:12 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: UK
Watch: 124273
Posts: 831
|
Agreed
The hunt is on... Before the BB 36 appears on the scene and potentially upsets the plan! Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
__________________
Explorer 124273 | Explorer II 16570 Polar | |
17 May 2016, 04:32 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
if 114270 works for your wrist then that's my vote. just make sure it works is all i'm sayin' by trying on in person
|
17 May 2016, 04:42 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Grant
Location: NZ
Watch: Moon
Posts: 1,719
|
Another vote here for 114270.
It can feel small when you first try it on, but it doesn't take long to realize what a perfectly proportioned watch it is. Extremely comfortable too. And if you've been wanting one for 5 years, that's all the reason you need. Here's mine toughing out the daily office grind. Cheers, -GW |
17 May 2016, 04:50 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
both sound like great options. The major factor to consider is wrist size. 6.5 inches or less I would go with the explorer 36mm. The second factor is the new style bracelet and clasp on the op39mm. If you think you would really enjoy the bracelet upgrade I would go that route.
|
17 May 2016, 05:16 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 151
|
The 114300 Rhodium IS stunning! Love mine. That's my vote... But I'm biased. :)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 May 2016, 05:21 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
36 explorer every time ,, a true keeper
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.