The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 2 June 2016, 05:46 AM   #1
Breadstickz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 114060
Posts: 50
15400 blue vs 15202?

Hi everyone, so I'm looking into getting my first ap and am just enamoured by the 15400 blue or the jumbo and was hoping for some advice. The watch would be my new daily wearer and I was wondering which would you choose and why? Which would be sturdier and less prone to issues? Thanks in advance for any and all help! It's greatly appreciated!
Breadstickz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 05:55 AM   #2
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
15400 blue vs 15202?

Jumbo because it's awesome


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 05:59 AM   #3
PJ S
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 3,990
The perennial debate on this exact quandary is contained within these hallowed pages – you just have to bother looking and using the search function.
PJ S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:20 AM   #4
Breadstickz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 114060
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJ S View Post
The perennial debate on this exact quandary is contained within these hallowed pages – you just have to bother looking and using the search function.
Thanks I have looked up a few of the other threads as well, have been doing quite a bit of research as it'll be my first ap so I figured no harm in bringing it up. Better safe then sorry as they say!
Breadstickz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:02 AM   #5
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,004
Huge fan of the Jumbo and most comfortable watch I own. There is just something truly special about it so easy choice for me. I would suggest trying both on and you will know rather quickly. Best of luck with your decision.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:22 AM   #6
Breadstickz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 114060
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by HL65 View Post
Huge fan of the Jumbo and most comfortable watch I own. There is just something truly special about it so easy choice for me. I would suggest trying both on and you will know rather quickly. Best of luck with your decision.
Thanks for the advice! Will definitely be trying both on before purchase, unfortunately they don't have a boutique in Toronto so I can't see the 15400 blue in person, but will definitely be trying on a black or white.
Breadstickz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:20 AM   #7
anothernewphone
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Bill
Location: Plymouth Meeting
Watch: 116520
Posts: 3,209
The Jumbo is a fantastic watch, but I like having a seconds hand. Fitment is another question, do you want 39mm or 41?
anothernewphone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:26 AM   #8
Peterandwatches
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: WA
Watch: 5167/15400/Sub/JLC
Posts: 1,023
I went with the 15400 as it's a bit more sporty for daily wear, has some modern touches, and also exists in a lower price point.

I also argue that the 15400 is the version most true to the original Royal Oak. The Royal Oak is intended to wear large (hence, Jumbo), and the 15400 keeps those dynamics alive at 41 mm. Both fantastic choices, and there are no wrong decisions!
Peterandwatches is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 03:15 PM   #9
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peterandwatches View Post
I went with the 15400 as it's a bit more sporty for daily wear, has some modern touches, and also exists in a lower price point.

I also argue that the 15400 is the version most true to the original Royal Oak. The Royal Oak is intended to wear large (hence, Jumbo), and the 15400 keeps those dynamics alive at 41 mm. Both fantastic choices, and there are no wrong decisions!
Surely you joke


Had a 15400 and its a great piece. Traded it after picking up a 5711 as it felt a bit cumbersome. If I went back I think I would go 15202 but I can't say for sure as I really do like the seconds hand. Only one thing is certain, I need another Royal oak
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:26 AM   #10
RHIII
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Roger
Location: ...
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 6,309
Jumbo - without question or hesitation....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RHIII is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 07:30 AM   #11
ndrenfro
2024 Pledge Member
 
ndrenfro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by RHIII View Post
Jumbo - without question or hesitation....


Agree
ndrenfro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:57 AM   #12
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
There's quite a bit of difference between the two - size, hands, date-set, ancestry, plus the shade of blue on the dials, so it comes down to which suits you most.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 07:07 AM   #13
WristEnvy
"TRF" Member
 
WristEnvy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Ray
Location: Berkeley, CA
Watch: IG @watch.kakashi
Posts: 2,579
For me personally, I find having the seconds hand a bit more practical. I'm interested in getting my first AP as well. I'll try on the 15400 when I have a chance, but i'm not in a rush, because i'll just end up buying now if it fits well. What others are saying is also consider a 15300, if you feel the 15400 is too big on your wrist.
WristEnvy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 10:46 AM   #14
Cabaiguan
"TRF" Member
 
Cabaiguan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Raf
Location: NJ
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 2,155
Jumbo. I've owned both in blue and the Jumbo has stayed.
__________________
"A ship of war is the best ambassador." - Oliver Cromwell
Cabaiguan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 11:03 AM   #15
alexlt730512
"TRF" Member
 
alexlt730512's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,248
15202
alexlt730512 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 11:33 AM   #16
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
I think the 15202 is nice due to the history and the movement is gorgeous. Realistically, I prefer the size and feel of the 15400. The 15202 felt a bit lighter and more fragile to me.
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 June 2016, 12:38 AM   #17
Breadstickz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Toronto
Watch: 114060
Posts: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by s14roller View Post
I think the 15202 is nice due to the history and the movement is gorgeous. Realistically, I prefer the size and feel of the 15400. The 15202 felt a bit lighter and more fragile to me.
Does it just feel more fragile due to the thinner dimension? Is it actually more fragile or just feels it?
Breadstickz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 June 2016, 02:04 AM   #18
NoVaSubowner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,095
Its anything but fragile. As robust as the 15400. Just thinner. I had the 15400, loved it. Did not love the proportions and I have a 7 3/4 wrist. Its 41mm but wears like 43mm.

I would go Jumbo next time for the sizing reason alone...
NoVaSubowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 11:47 AM   #19
agsstructures
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
agsstructures's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,401
Had the 15202 and now have the black 15400. Appreciate the 15202 for the history but I prefer the 15400 more for an everyday piece.

Either way good luck!
agsstructures is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 11:59 AM   #20
NoVaSubowner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,095
Having owned the 15400 I would honestly say that if I could do it over again I would probably go Jumbo.........
NoVaSubowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 12:46 PM   #21
cervantes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Jay
Location: East and West
Posts: 1,894
Prefer the Jumbo.
cervantes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 01:40 PM   #22
el1125
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 3,578
Jumbo!
el1125 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 01:39 PM   #23
7sins
"TRF" Member
 
7sins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: B.
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 3,621
Much prefer the seconds hand, went with the 15300 and couldn't be happier.
__________________
Richard Mille RG RM030 || Richard Mille RM72ti || AP 26240 50TH Green Royal Oak Chrono || AP Royal Oak Off Shore Gulf Blue 26238 || AP Royal Oak Blue JUMBO SS 15202ST || AP ROO Diver Green 15720ST || ♕ Rolex Platinum Daytona Diamond 116506 || Cartier Santos
7sins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 03:16 PM   #24
Daycruiser
"TRF" Member
 
Daycruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Real Name: Ed
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: BLRO 5712
Posts: 787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Breadstickz View Post
Hi everyone, so I'm looking into getting my first ap and am just enamoured by the 15400 blue or the jumbo and was hoping for some advice. The watch would be my new daily wearer and I was wondering which would you choose and why? Which would be sturdier and less prone to issues? Thanks in advance for any and all help! It's greatly appreciated!
Well both are not easy to find.

The Jumbo is a classic, Gérald Genta at his very best (comparable to Nautlius IMHO) it's sleek, thin and sits very comfortably on ones wrist.

The 15400 is one of my Grail watches, I prefer a "bigger" watch because I am a big guy with a big wrist. I went with the 26320 because of that, and also because of the great discount I managed to get vis a vis a MSRP 15400 from the boutique shop.

Both are masterpieces, but you have to consider whether you want a 39mm or a 41mm, and the 41mm pretty much sits on your wrist like a 42mm, so if you prefer more classical styling go with the 15202, if you want a more contemporary take on a classic go with a 15400.
Daycruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 05:53 PM   #25
dr.ns23
"TRF" Member
 
dr.ns23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Somewhere
Watch: 15202
Posts: 436
15202 for sure
dr.ns23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:19 PM   #26
RichHitch
"TRF" Member
 
RichHitch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Barth
Location: London
Watch: Rolex Patek AP
Posts: 108
I own and love the 15400... But I prefer the dimensions and dial layout of the 15202 !
RichHitch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 06:48 PM   #27
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
No contest. Jumbo win hands down.



__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 07:35 PM   #28
rebel_1
"TRF" Member
 
rebel_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
My understanding is the blue dial 15400 is a botique only piece, so it's probably hard to come by. I own the Jumbo. I actually prefer the no second hand dial. The only two things I dislike about the Jumbo are #1 it's not a Nautilus & #2 it's a pain to manually wind. If I had it to do all over, I'd probably have gone with a PP 5711 instead.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
rebel_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 June 2016, 07:43 PM   #29
lapince
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Mars
Watch: 5712
Posts: 11,509
saw both, the 15400 did nothing to me, the Jumbo did, it's proportions are so much better IMO than the other...
lapince is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 June 2016, 01:18 PM   #30
Chute
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Austin
Watch: 6 digit Rolex+APRO
Posts: 1,560
You have to try them on, quite different on the wrist between a thin 15202 39mm watch and a thicker 15400 at 41mm. For me, neither fit right so I'm on the hunt for a 15300 or 5711 if I can ever find one of either to try on.
Chute is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.