ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
5 July 2016, 11:15 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: US
Watch: 16570, 216570
Posts: 161
|
The Magic of Lume!!
My 1995 16570 never stood out to me one way or the other.
When I got the 216570 what stood out immediately is the blue lume. And here is why the polar white dial is really so amazing on this watch - in the bright light my dial is white on white. When i hit shade/shadow etc etc i'm looking at glowing blue jumping out of the white dial. My LV the blue lume looks kind of green. It's the green dial that does that. On my LN sub or BLNR you can easily tell it's a blue lume against the black dial. But it doesn't pop. It looks bluer than the LV, but it still doesn't jump out at you - even with the blue cerachrome color splash against it. I'm going to assume as well on the black dial 216570 it doesn't pop the same blue. Floating hands, sure. But that white, though |
6 July 2016, 03:28 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
The lume on my 114300 is somewhere between "'eh" and terrible and it's only 6mo old. The sport models definitely have a better application. Lume never really bothered me much, so as long as it does its job, even a mediocre job, I'm fine.
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
6 July 2016, 04:38 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Zak
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Watch: Rolex 114300
Posts: 290
|
You are not lying. The lume on my 114300 is terrible. My SKX has a way better lume.
__________________
You don't tell the time, you show the time. |
6 July 2016, 04:56 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: 1655/MkI
Posts: 1,100
|
believe it or not...even with the Indiglo option, Timex has the best lume. the hands glow with minimal 'charging'.
Rolexes were at their best with tritium even though the 'shelf-life' illumination was only 12 years or so. radium, though effective for 1600 years+ is another story...why risk the gamma? |
6 July 2016, 05:45 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
You guys need to own a Tudor pelagos.
|
6 July 2016, 06:23 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Canada
Posts: 186
|
|
6 July 2016, 02:51 PM | #7 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
Quote:
I'm not upset, I don't really need the lume, I'm More irritated about sapphire crystal glare
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
|
6 July 2016, 10:18 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Zak
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Watch: Rolex 114300
Posts: 290
|
I 100% agree.
__________________
You don't tell the time, you show the time. |
6 July 2016, 09:40 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: 1 of 13 Colonies
Posts: 8,575
|
Exp II (2000) - green lume & BLNR - blue lume. Both good imo, but just different
|
6 July 2016, 10:46 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
|
What we really need Rolex to do is to take a page from Tudor.
Subs without lumed bezels is so last Century. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
6 July 2016, 12:38 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Oscar
Location: IL USA
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 50
|
I really love the lumed bezel and yes wish Rolex would also make them. Guess I'll have to pick up a Pelagos so cratch that itch
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.