|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
1 September 2016, 04:34 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: London
Posts: 8
|
Fake or real ..... 5513
Need some expert help before i bite the bullet on this 5513
watch is from 1969 .. please chime in if you can help me on this one if its kosher Regards Tony http://www.rolexforums.com/attachmen...1&d=1472328403 http://www.rolexforums.com/attachmen...1&d=1472328403 http://www.rolexforums.com/attachmen...1&d=1472328403 http://www.rolexforums.com/attachmen...1&d=1472328403 http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/ovYAAO...w-/s-l1600.jpg http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/q-YAAO...w7/s-l1600.jpg http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/PM0AAO...wy/s-l1600.jpg http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/-b4AAO...wn/s-l1600.jpg http://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/qk8AAO...wj/s-l1600.jpg |
|
|
|
1 September 2016, 05:43 AM
|
#2 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Andy
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: AKA: ANDERL712000
Posts: 4,935
|
Looks good here, in rough shape
__________________
We want to be the first in the field and Rolex should be seen as the one and only-the best. Hans Wilsdorf, Rolex founder |
|
|
|
|
1 September 2016, 05:45 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
|
To me, that all ties up
S/No places it 1970 Movement 1520 is correct for a model 5513 Case and dial look original to me. Triplock crown correct too. In my opinion a nice piece. Lets here what others say Adam
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill "We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done." |
|
|
|
|
1 September 2016, 06:08 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Chicago
Watch: Doxa Pro 300 NoT
Posts: 535
|
Overall, this 5513 looks good to me. I have some concerns regarding the dial and hands: There may have been some water damage to the dial. Look at the lume at 11 o'clock and the bottom tip of the triangle-lume at 12 o'clock. And there's a good chance that the dial and hands were re-lumed (albeit with tritium) at some point. Does anyone else agree with me?
|
|
|
|
|
3 September 2016, 07:54 AM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: LA
Posts: 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 September 2016, 07:55 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: LA
Posts: 10
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
