ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
4 September 2016, 07:21 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
|
GMT 1675 Originality Check
Dear Learned Ones, thoughts on how original this '77 vintage 1675 might be or otherwise?
Lume, insert looks too fresh to my untrained eyes. |
4 September 2016, 11:32 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: SeB
Location: Germany
Watch: MaD_aT_gMt
Posts: 1,219
|
Lume on this MKIV dial is OK. Correct dial for 1977. Hands look ok, too.
Insert is later service replacement. For the case I / we would need more pics from different angles. |
4 September 2016, 11:39 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex GMT Masters
Posts: 238
|
based on the picture it looks like relume?
|
5 September 2016, 10:53 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
|
Extremely irresponsible statement. The dial is fine
__________________
sumnersdr on Instagram |
5 September 2016, 05:12 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: SeB
Location: Germany
Watch: MaD_aT_gMt
Posts: 1,219
|
No. Not a relume. The rough lume structure is OK for MKIV dials at this time.
Here's my 5.1Mio. series for comparison....but maybe it's a relume, too ;-) |
5 September 2016, 08:57 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Stratosphere
Posts: 1,993
|
[QUOTE=buenosdias;6981683]No. Not a relume. The rough lume structure is OK for MKIV dials at this time.
Here's my 5.1Mio. series for comparison....but maybe it's a relume, too ;-) /QUOTE] Seb that is definitely relumed and has no value anymore! Here let me take it and end your struggle!! Stunning watch bro! OP. More pics would help with assessing the case. |
5 September 2016, 12:57 PM | #7 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
|
Quote:
|
|
5 September 2016, 01:08 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Rome
Posts: 91
|
the insert is definitely newer, 1675 never had the black insert...
Dial not relumed in my opinion.. and watch in good shape ;) |
5 September 2016, 06:45 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
GMT 1675 Originality Check
Quote:
i beg to differ, 1675 did come with FF black insert. Case looks fine but a lil over polished for my taste. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
6 September 2016, 07:19 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Rome
Posts: 91
|
God forbid .. only to share infos .. but for what they are my knowledge and my studies black insert has been provided as an alternative to the 16750, of course, it is compatible with the 1675, but in my humble opinion has never been available as original inlay for the production 1675.. Neither ff nor slim... Only pepsi
|
6 September 2016, 04:24 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Quote:
Thanks for sharing. It's true black insert was not available in the beginning. There was not a clear consensus, but some collectors agreed it was available mid or late 70's as an option. The way I see it, if black insert was never meant to be sold with a watch, why produce it in such quantity? Of course only Rolex will know. Cheers. I blame it on the autoconnect. |
|
5 September 2016, 11:17 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: SeB
Location: Germany
Watch: MaD_aT_gMt
Posts: 1,219
|
Engravings look legit.
Case is OK. The inside of the 11/7 o'clock lug is a bit worn out (from loose bracelet). Yes, the case is polished...but hey, it's a 39 yo watch. Looks quite symmetric and strong. Strong crown guards, too. Not a collectors item, but a nice watch to wear! If the price is ok/reasonable, I would go for it! |
6 September 2016, 06:41 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,600
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.