The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 September 2016, 03:05 PM   #1
Pmt2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
SD 4000 for a two tone Gmtc

I just got a sea dweller 4000 and love it! My ad contacts me and tells me he just recently got a 116713 two tone Gmtc in and offered to trade for my sd 4000. The Gmtc is my favorite Rolex. Should I do it? He wants my sd with 1,000$ cash. Thank you in advance.
Pmt2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 03:11 PM   #2
yunach
"TRF" Member
 
yunach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: iphone
Watch: RolexRolexRolex
Posts: 297
Simple question. I'll let you answer that one.



yunach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 03:20 PM   #3
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
Something sounds fishy here. The GMT is priced $2000 above your sea-dweller and your trying to tell me your AD only wants $1000 more for the trade? I mean it is early in the morning here but that does not sound right.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 03:28 PM   #4
Pmt2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
My sd 4000 is a 2015 model with box and papers. His Gmtc is a Z model.
Pmt2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 03:32 PM   #5
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pmt2 View Post
My sd 4000 is a 2015 model with box and papers. His Gmtc is a Z model.
The 116713 is the ceramic GMT. You used the wrong model number. The GMT you are referring to is the non ceramic 16713. I would not do that trade. It is not worth it for you. Stay clear.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 05:13 PM   #6
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
Quote:
Originally Posted by japenney View Post
The 116713 is the ceramic GMT. You used the wrong model number. The GMT you are referring to is the non ceramic 16713. I would not do that trade. It is not worth it for you. Stay clear.
The 116713 was introduced in 2006 which coincides with the Z serial so the OP may be correct in his statement.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 05:16 PM   #7
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
Good catch I thought they started the year after....if it is indeed ceramic then the trade is fine. Consider that the gmt is 10 years old tho and may be in need of service soon. Id factor that into the price

Sent by my pet Gekko
__________________
Follow me on Instagram to see my watch journey @Japenney
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 05:16 PM   #8
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
OP: a Z 116713 for a new 116600 would be a straight swap IMO. I've seen older 116713 sell in the $7500-$8000 range - about what your watch is probably worth.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 05:26 PM   #9
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
OP: a Z 116713 for a new 116600 would be a straight swap IMO. I've seen older 116713 sell in the $7500-$8000 range - about what your watch is probably worth.
__________________
Instagram: @Hairdude
Watches in Collection 5070R, 5522A, 214270 MK1, 228238

16750, 26401, 5711, 116718, 116710LN, 116300, 16710"Coke", 372, 15300, 15703 (All Flipped)
Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
Official Member 'WIS-CON' Las Vegas Int'l GTG 2018
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 05:25 PM   #10
Gerardus
"TRF" Member
 
Gerardus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,142
I would keep the new 116600 because it wears more under the radar.
My GMTIIc TT gets the least wrist time.
__________________

♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300
Gerardus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 06:15 PM   #11
shoppy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Watch: OP and daytona
Posts: 1,783
They are both stunning watches and two of my favourite models, however in this I would not trade a under 2 year old watch for a 10 year old and pay for the privilege. I would simply save and get a pre owned one on older one that comes up on the forum.
__________________
My family are my life and spirit and strength...
Rolex daytona, YMs, OPs Z blue, subs, GMTs, Daydates,
Omega Snoopy, chornomaster, apollo 8, ATs, POs,
PP, JLC, VC, Swatch ,Casio, Timex.
shoppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 06:35 PM   #12
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,299
What are the conditions of the two watches? I would have thought a straight swap unless your SDc is in rough shape or the GMT was very recently serviced by RSC.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 09:13 PM   #13
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,489
You say the GMT-C is your favorite Rolex, so yes. Make the trade.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 09:17 PM   #14
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
If it's mint go for it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 10:11 PM   #15
Pmt2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
Thank you all for your responses. The ad tells me that the Gmtc is from 2011 with a Z serial. They are both in mint condition.
Pmt2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 10:24 PM   #16
WAK4
2024 Pledge Member
 
WAK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pmt2 View Post
Thank you all for your responses. The ad tells me that the Gmtc is from 2011 with a Z serial. They are both in mint condition.
2011 is when the warranty is dated? Keep in mind as Mike stated above, the Z serials were generally around 2006. Possible it sat in a case somewhere for 5 years before being sold, at which time the warranty would be stamped and dated. Something to consider.

Any idea on service history, etc?
WAK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 10:26 PM   #17
THC
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,666
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pmt2 View Post
Thank you all for your responses. The ad tells me that the Gmtc is from 2011 with a Z serial. They are both in mint condition.
2010 is a G serial, which is the last, prior to the randoms starting in 2011 ..Sounds like the AD is selling you hard... Offer a straight up swap, as previously mentioned

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=8478
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 September 2016, 06:53 AM   #18
fskywalker
2024 Pledge Member
 
fskywalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pmt2 View Post
Thank you all for your responses. The ad tells me that the Gmtc is from 2011 with a Z serial. They are both in mint condition.


Being your favorite Rolex would go to see it at least. Your AD might have a client waiting for your SD? If so perhaps you can bargain a smaller premium in top of yours.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Francisco
♛ 16610 / 116264
Ω 168.022 / 2535.80.00 / 310.30.42.50.01.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001
Zenith 02.480.405

2FA security enabled
fskywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 10:21 PM   #19
WAK4
2024 Pledge Member
 
WAK4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Bill
Location: NJ
Watch: Always changing
Posts: 4,172
If dealing with a private trade, straight swap probably the way to go. Dealing with an AD who is looking to make a profit, the $1k may not be horrendous. Are they offering any time of in house warranty on the GMT?

Is the TT GMT-C your favorite, or just a GMT-C in general? Anything else in the collection?

Would I do it? No...but my personal preference is the SD regardless of value.
WAK4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 10:59 PM   #20
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,089
If both are in the same condition it's a straight up trade IMO
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 11:07 PM   #21
marcotagudelo
"TRF" Member
 
marcotagudelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: in my house
Posts: 357
check for service history? or factor in if they would throw that in the mix for the deal.
i mean if he called you for it its because he knows your very interested so do what makes you happy
marcotagudelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 11:21 PM   #22
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Nope. Not a brand new watch for a Z serial plus 1k. I'd think about it for an even trade, but even then probably not.

My advice: enjoy the new watch and later on down the road, when you start to get that "itch," add a GMT.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 11:26 PM   #23
2JHead
"TRF" Member
 
2JHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 609
I'd do it, the gmt wears nicer, not so top heavy
2JHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 September 2016, 11:42 PM   #24
JP(Canada)
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB, CAN
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pmt2 View Post
I just got a sea dweller 4000 and love it! My ad contacts me and tells me he just recently got a 116713 two tone Gmtc in and offered to trade for my sd 4000. The Gmtc is my favorite Rolex. Should I do it? He wants my sd with 1,000$ cash. Thank you in advance.
I think you already answered your question. It's your favorite Rolex. Price doesn't sound out of line, and it's from your AD, someone you're familiar with and can return to. It really just depends on how much you've bonded with the SD.
__________________
JP
JP(Canada) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2016, 12:18 AM   #25
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
In the real world it is a straight up trade. For a dealer to make money, the $1000 sounds correct! AD's aren't going to stay in business very long if they make straight up even deals.
Watchgeek5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2016, 01:13 AM   #26
JP(Canada)
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB, CAN
Posts: 795
Quote:
Originally Posted by Watchgeek5000 View Post
In the real world it is a straight up trade. For a dealer to make money, the $1000 sounds correct! AD's aren't going to stay in business very long if they make straight up even deals.
In my world a pre-owned TT GMT is still worth more than a pre-owned SD4k. And I agree with what you said about ADs needing to make money, but this seems like a fair deal.
__________________
JP
JP(Canada) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2016, 01:38 AM   #27
Watchgeek5000
"TRF" Member
 
Watchgeek5000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP(Canada) View Post
In my world a pre-owned TT GMT is still worth more than a pre-owned SD4k. And I agree with what you said about ADs needing to make money, but this seems like a fair deal.
SD4000 seem to be averaging around $7500 pre owned, TT GMTC are at around $8500. It actually seems like a good deal especially from an AD.
Watchgeek5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2016, 12:23 AM   #28
Danny83
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Danny83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,312
Go for it
Danny83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2016, 02:28 AM   #29
Pmt2
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 1,145
You guys are the BEST!!! Thanks
Pmt2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 September 2016, 04:51 AM   #30
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
1k is for the hassle free-ness of an AD. Your call. I'd probably rather spend the extra 1K hunting for an unworn or almost new 2016 model.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.